| |
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
Unity governments - Kenya experience - Index of articles
On
the brink of the precipice: A human rights account of Kenya's
post 2007 election violence
Kenya National Commission on Human Rights (KNCHR)
August 08, 2008
Download
this document
- Acrobat
PDF version (5.1MB)
If you do not have the free Acrobat reader
on your computer, download it from the Adobe website by clicking
here.
Background
The Kenya National
Commission on Human rights (KNCHR) is the country's lead agency
with the statutory mandate to protect and promote the human rights
of all individuals living in Kenya. Following the post-election
violence in Kenya after the 2007 General Election, the National
Commission commenced an investigation into the character and scope
of the human rights violations which happened following the December
2007 election results crisis.
The overall
aim of the investigation was to document the post-election violence
to ensure that there would be a comprehensive record of the violations
committed during that period as a basis for enabling redress of
such violations. The investigation was framed in terms of Section
16 of the Commission's constitutive Act, the KNCHR Act, which empowers
the National Commission to; investigate on its own motion or upon
a complaint, any human rights violation in the country.
In undertaking
these investigations, KNCHR teams comprising commissioners and staff
undertook over 36 missions to more than 135 constituencies across
the country and to Uganda, with an average duration of eight days
per mission, During a period of four months, 1,102 statements recounting
over 7,500 episodes of violence or incitement to violence were gathered
from individuals with whom interviewers spoke. This information
was complemented by hundreds of secondary data, including media
stories, reports from organisations such as the Kenya Red Cross
and internet materials among other sources that have been gathered
from a variety of credible sources in Kenya and abroad.
Information
was gathered from the men and women of Kenya of all ethnicities
and all walks of life, including farmers, lDPs, pastoralists, fishermen,
public officials, security personnel, the provincial administration,
religious and political leaders, elders, shop keepers, students
and many other people. We got information from 46 senior police
officers across the regions we visited, 40 members of the provincial
administration (PCs, DCs, Dos and Chiefs), 33 councillors and around
10 sitting and former Members of Parliament. A key element in identifying
the people with whom we spoke related to ensuring diversity of experiences,
opinions and backgrounds, in order to enhance the participatory
nature and impact of this work. This in itself is an important step
towards accountability for the post-election violence through engagement
of the people of Kenya in establishing a record of what happened
and recommending how it might be prevented in the future.
We employed
objective criteria to determine which areas to visit, including
the degree to which information gathered indicated a high level
of violatlons had occurred; visiting people with information for
example in IDP camps, as well as visiting the sites of violations
themselves; ensuring a representative geographic spread across those
areas of the country that were affected by the post-election violence;
ensuring a representative spread of alleged victims and perpetrators,
including both individuals and State institutions; and considerations
related to access and security. Throughout the period of this work,
we abided by the prin ciple of 'doing no harm to all those who were
giving us information. This also entailed protecting the information
itself. For this reason, basic protocols were developed and implemented
to ensure the safety and security of our interviewees and the information
they gave us.
Based on the
investigations carried out, the Commission is issuing this special
report to the President and the National Assembly under Section
21 (1) of the Kenya National Commission on Human Rights Act, which
provides that the Commission may at any time submit special reports
to the President and to the National Assembly on any matter.
In releasing
this report, the National Commission is requesting his Excellency
the President, the Prime Minister, the Minister for Justice, National
Cohesion and Constitutional Affairs, the Attorney General, Members
of Parliament, state agencies, civil society, the international
community, the lnternational Criminal Court (lCC), and the Office
of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, to study the report and
take note of and implement its findings and
recommendations at the earliest opportunity.
Download
full document
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|