|
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
2008 harmonised elections - Index of articles
Post-election violence 2008 - Index of articles & images
Interview
with Xolani Zitha, Director of Crisis in Zimbabwe Coalition
CIVICUS
April 30, 2008
http://www.civicus.org/csw/FRONTPAGE_ZIMBABWE_No35.htm
Almost a month
after elections were held in Zimbabwe, the country remains in a
state of flux and uncertainty. Amidst ongoing political violence,
the ruling party ZANU PF is demanding a runoff election with the
opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC). Anxious of more
violence and vote-rigging, the MDC has so far refused to commit
to a runoff. In this increasingly tense environment, civil society
activists who worked to educate voters, as well as observed the
elections are now finding themselves harassed, intimidated and even
behind bars. Xolani Zitha, the director of Crisis
in Zimbabwe Coalition based in Harare, Zimbabwe tells Civil
Society Watch about his hopes for a solution.
What
role has Crisis in Zimbabwe Coalition played during the election
process?
There are a
couple of things the Crisis in Zimbabwe Coalition (Crisis) has done.
Internally in Zimbabwe, we have worked to coordinate civil society
to try and encourage a higher voter turnout. We ran the "Get
Out and Vote" campaign that tried to send positive messages
to the citizenry that has really been battered over the last eight
years. The campaign was not just about putting up posters, but also
visiting communities. We also urged the diaspora to come back and
vote or to encourage folks still back in Zimbabwe to vote.
I think that
this campaign, along with the work of other organizations, has really
been a success. This is the first time in 28 years that there could
be a change of government. The ruling party was defeated in the
parliament, the senate and even in the presidential vote. This was
possible because of the work of the MDC, as well as that of civil
society organizations.
Have
other organizations also played a role in the election process?
A couple of
other civil society organisations have done different things as
well. The Zimbabwe
Election Support Network (ZESN) sent out observers to monitor
the elections and participate in the simultaneous vote collection.
This is something we hadn't yet experimented with in Zimbabwe.
Yet it proved very valuable. It helped the opposition to see how
they performed. The Southern African Development Community (SADC)
also made it a requirement to publicize the ballot results outside
each of the polling stations, so that made it easier for election
observers to collect the results and calculate the totals on their
own. The success of this is also why the government has placed pressure
on Crisis and ZESN.
How
has the government responded to civil society organizations?
The government
agents have raided offices, harassed activists, and accused them
of treasonous acts. The government says that monitoring the polls
is solely the role of the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission (ZEC). They
also say that civic voter education is also only to be done by ZEC.
But they don't have the capacity to do it.
Because of work
around the elections, there has been backlash in two particular
ways. Firstly, there has been violence against citizens in the rural
areas, and secondly, there has been a backlash against civil society
activists who were involved in the election observation and have
since been arrested and harassed.
Prominent human
rights lawyer Harrison Nkomo was arrested
on 7 May. Zimbabwe
Congress of Trade Union (ZCTU) president Lovemore Matombo and
secretary-general Wellington Chibebe were also recently arrested
and charged with making statements encouraging public disorder,
in connection with speeches they made on May Day.
What
is the feeling right now in Zimbabwe among civil society, as well
as the public more generally?
It's a
mixture of hope, frustration and anger. It's frustrating if
we look at how the ZEC has contradicted itself and how it has continually
found excuses for delays. It seems that it is prepared to make any
excuse to allow ZANU PF to cling to power. But the elections have
delivered a clear statement - the time has come for a change.
The violence
that we have seen has really been the worst carnage since the Gukurahundi1
days. In the rural areas, people are checking into hospitals seriously
hurt, some even without limbs.
There is anxiety
about what is going to happen with the country. The government is
using the military to block the will expressed by the people. ZANU
PF is using the military to oppress citizens in the same areas that
were once their own strong holds.
What
do you think the future of Zimbabwe looks like? Will a runoff happen?
Given the violence
that has been unleashed by ZANU PF, we can understand that MDC does
not want to be involved in a runoff. MDC is saying there is no way
we can proceed with a free and fair election when their people on
the ground are being attacked, and killed even. If there is a runoff
- what will happen? ZANU PF will be happy to call an election,
but if MDC doesn't participate, they can just say ZANU PF
won unopposed.
The solution
would be an election-taking place under specific circumstances,
with a discussion on transition issues. Also civil society has called
for specific conditions to be put in place before the election is
to take place.
But if negotiations
with SADC succeed, we could also have a negotiated solution. We
have seen a lot of diplomatic activity coming out of Africa -
out of the African Union (AU) and SADC. President Thabo Mbeki (of
South Africa) is in Zimbabwe today. We're not sure what is
being discussed, but I think there is probably pressure on the ZEC
to announce the date of the election, as well as to investigate
the violence.
You
mentioned that civil society would like any election to meet certain
conditions. Could you describe those conditions?
We would ask
for international observers to be present, not just the AU and SADC.
The time has come for the United Nations (UN) to become involved.
The presence of the UN is essential, as we have evidence of systematic
violent attacks taking place.
We should also
have assurances that the legal framework is transparent and conducive.
International media needs to have greater access. Civil society
also needs to have the freedom to work. There needs to be an opening
of space for civil society to carry out civic education campaigns.
At the moment, some of the violence is being meted out against activists
who carried out civic education or conducted observer missions.
We need assurances that we are able to carry out our work without
fear.
What
can regional and international civil society do to assist?
The work that
regional civil society can do is crucial. We need to see African
organizations engaging governments and playing a role in the AU.
We need them to ensure their leaders assist Zimbabwe in getting
on a path to democracy. We need them to pressure Mugabe to begin
to prepare to leave. How does that happen? That happens in an election
that is free and fair. Or should the solution be found in negotiations,
we would demand a process that would take into consideration the
interests of citizens. There's a crisis in Zimbabwe that is
affecting the economy and every facet of society, but it is crisis
of governance. The solution also needs to take account how we will
form a new constitution. Most importantly, any solution needs to
rejuvenate the faith and confidence of citizens in Zimbabwe's public
institutions.
Notes
1. The Gukurahundi
(Shona: "the early rain which washes away the chaff before
the spring rains") refers to atrocities committed by the Fifth
Brigade army, led by President Robert Mugabe, in the Ndebele provinces
of Matabeleland and the Midlands from 1982 to the late 1980s.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|