| |
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
2008 harmonised elections - Index of articles
Election
observers are a thorny issue for Zimbabwe
Peter Fabricius, The Sunday Independent (SA)
February 24, 2008
http://www.zwnews.com/issuefull.cfm?ArticleID=18268
The South African
government says that if the Zimbabweans implement everything they
agreed to in their negotiations mediated
by President Thabo Mbeki, their March 29 elections should be free
and fair. But who is going to ensure they comply? The Zimbabwean
government made it clear on Friday that only friendly governments
and organisations would be invited to observe the poll. The opposition
Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) believes the elections cannot
be free and fair because President Robert Mugabe has already refused
to implement important things he agreed to in the negotiations,
especially a new constitution. Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma, the foreign
minister, was asked at a press conference on Monday what the prospects
were for free and fair elections in these circumstances. She replied:
"Well, the view of the South African government is that if
the Zimbabweans implement everything that they have agreed upon
during their negotiations . . . (if they implement the laws passed
by parliament around security, information, media and all those
laws) . . . the prospects for free and fair elections should be
good."
But, leaving aside the
MDC's concerns about the lack of a new constitution, who will be
in Zimbabwe to observe whether these other agreements are implemented?
Zanu PF and the MDC never agreed that they should have a joint say
in who could monitor the elections to ensure a full range of observers.
And George Charamba, Mugabe's spokesman, made it clear on Friday
that, once again, only countries or organisations that had not criticised
past elections would be invited. This included South Africa and
all other Southern African Development Community (SADC) countries.
It was the SADC leaders who mandated Mbeki's mediation mission.
Charamba said the South African government would be especially welcome
as it would want to observe the results of its mediation. He said
SADC itself would also be invited as well as the East and West African
regional blocs, the African Union, the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM),
and certain developing world countries such as China.
Zimbabwe would not -
"and I repeat, not" - invite the European Union (EU),
although, intriguingly, Charamba suggested that one or two specific
but unnamed European states would be invited. Ronnie Mamoepa, the
spokesman for the department of foreign affairs, responded by expressing
South Africa's willingness to send an observer mission, either on
its own or as part of the SADC. On past performance, Charamba's
announcement means that no observers will issue critical reports
of the March 29 elections. After the 2000 parliamentary elections,
the EU monitors issued a critical report and were not invited back.
After the 2002 presidential elections, the Commonwealth observer
mission said it was unable to certify the election as free and fair.
This led to Zimbabwe being suspected from the Commonwealth and so
the Commonwealth has never been invited back.
That year SADC - that
is, the 14 governments in the organisation - declared itself satisfied
with the elections. But the SADC parliamentary forum - which includes
not only ruling parties but also opposition political parties from
the region - did not approve the election. So it was denied observer
status at the 2005 parliamentary elections, except as a member of
the official SADC mission, which it declined, as this would have
compromised its autonomy. Other entities whose applications to observe
the 2005 elections were turned down included Cosatu, Norway, the
United States, the Electoral Institute of Southern Africa - a Johannesburg-based
NGO that specialises in monitoring Southern African elections -
and the Zimbabwe Observer Consortium, a group of South African NGOs
including the South African Council of Churches and the South African
NGO Coalition. South Africa has pronounced itself satisfied with
all these elections, though some non-government members of the observer
mission have issued dissenting minority reports.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|