Back to Index
Jury
still out on effectiveness of Zimbabwe's electoral reforms
ZimOnline
October
27, 2006
http://www.zimonline.co.za/Article.aspx?ArticleId=355
MUTARE - As
voters go the polls this weekend to elect councillors for rural
district wards, Zimbabweans are wondering whether the recently enacted
reforms are improving the conduct of the electoral process and practice.
The Zimbabwe
Electoral Commission Act and the Electoral
Act (2004) were successfully passed by Parliament in 2004, while
the Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment Act sailed through last year.
Promulgation
of these legislative pieces were part of concerted efforts by various
sections of the Zimbabwean society in a bid to help improve several
constitutional, institutional and procedural aspects of the country's
electoral process, amid growing contentions that the entire process
was hopelessly skewered against opposition politics and in favour
of the status quo.
Thus, the express
purpose of the electoral reforms have been to level Zimbabwe's political
playing field, although officials in the ruling ZANU PF party have
consistently denied it was unbalanced to the opposition's disadvantage.
Now, during
the polls in which a total of 863 rural ward seats are being contested
countrywide, the issue of whether a level playing field is being
achieved remains in abeyance.
"These reforms
mean nothing to me when election procedures keep favouring those
of one party, ZANU PF," says Getrude Sithole, a supporter of the
main wing of the opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC).
When the nomination
court for the rural elections opened last month, 1 326 seats were
up for grabs. By the time it closed, however, 463 seats had been
won unopposed - 454 by ZANU PF candidates, eight by the MDC and
one by an independent.
Over 500 MDC
candidates were disqualified for various reasons, including having
their names missing on voters' rolls or the aspiring candidates'
failure to timeously produce police and ratepayers' clearance certificates
on nomination day.
Sithole, who
is visiting relatives in the city, says no polling is taking place
in her rural ward in Chipinge because a ruling party candidate waltzed
in unopposed, following disqualification of his MDC opponent.
"Why waste time
talking about reform when one party gets nearly half the seats before
the voting starts?" she asks angrily, her voice quivering with emotion.
But Charles
Pemhenayi, a member of the central committee of ZANU PF, is convinced
a relative peaceful atmosphere and unhindered mobility in rural
areas by candidates of both parties campaigning in the poll are
directly attributable to legislative electoral reforms.
"It's commendable
that Zimbabweans are beginning to display this level of political
maturity, no violence and respect for your opponent, which were
not so common in previous elections," says Pemhenayi, a former ZANU
PF provincial spokesperson who now runs a private labour and human
resources consultancy in the city.
Adds Pemhenayi,
who also farms tobacco in the Odzi area, west of here: "ZANU PF
has been able to lead in rural areas because the electorate can
see the party's tangible programmes, such as land redistribution,
and its political history is well known. The MDC offers neither
of these."
Doreen Nelson,
a board member of the Zimbabawe
Election Support Network (ZESN), a non-partisan organisation
established six years ago to uphold the principles of a transparent
and fair electoral process, welcomes the reforms but insists more
needs to be done.
"The network
commends the relatively peaceful atmosphere that prevailed in most
areas during the pre-election period," Nelson says.
She is speaking
to members of the media fraternity in this eastern border city,
part of her organisation's media and information networking activities.
ZESN, she says, was one of the organisations that forwarded proposals
to amend electoral laws to responsible authorities in 2003-4.
"I'm glad to
report that some of our proposals were accepted and incorporated
into the new electoral reform laws," she tells the scribes, proudly
noting that one of them was the introduction of translucent ballot
boxes which has since been adopted.
She says ZESN
will continue to lobby for the inclusion of those aspects of its
proposals that were left out of the amended legislation. Among other
suggestions, her organisation is calling for the newly-established
Zimbabwe Electoral Commission to be granted "full and sole" responsibility
over the management of all elections.
ZESN is also
pushing for constitutional amendments to create a two-tier system
for the election of legislators. One group will be elected through
the constituency system, which is currently the case, and another
through proportional representation, it suggests.
In addition,
the ZESN seeks the abandonment of presidential appointments and
the introduction of a postal voting system for Zimbabweans in the
diaspora, as long as safeguards for transparency and fairness are
put into place for the latter.
It also wants
the appointment of election observers and monitors - both local
and international - to be guaranteed by a legislative Act.
The ZESN, whose
membership comprises at least 35 civic groups and non-governmental
organisations based in Zimbabwe, is deploying 520 observers in at
least 450 wards in Saturday's election.
"We hope the
prevailing peaceful environment shall continue to prevail during
and after the elections," says Nelson, before she and her team drove
up Mutare's panoramic Christmas Pass to begin the 270km journey
to the capital Harare.
For many Zimbabweans,
however, the jury is still out on whether or not the electoral laws
are contributing meaningfully to the country's much-maligned electoral
process. - ZimOnline
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|