| |
Back to Index
SADC
Mauritius protocol: Assessment of compliance with the protocol -
Issue No. 16
Sokwanele
February 14, 2005
On 17 August
2004, the Southern African Development Community (SADC) leaders
meeting in Mauritius adopted the SADC Protocol Principles
and Guidelines Governing Democratic Elections. Zimbabwe, as a member
of SADC, also signed the Protocol and committed itself to implementing
its standards.
Mauritius
Watch provides a regular, objective and non-partisan assessment
of Zimbabwes compliance with the Protocol. In the run-up to
the 2005 Parliamentary Elections we note any significant failures
to adhere to the SADC standards.
This special
weekly feature assumes an even greater significance now that the
date of the Parliamentary Elections has been announced 31
March. Less than 7 weeks remain before this crucial poll.
| Date |
Incidents/Developments
|
SADC
standards breached |
| 10.02.05 |
STILL
NO INVITATIONS
Less than
seven weeks before the date of the parliamentary elections
and well beyond the minimum of 90 days stipulated in the SADC
Protocol on Democratic Elections, the Mugabe regime has still
not issued any invitations to observe or monitor the Poll,
either to SADC or any other group. The SADC Protocol
requires the host country to issue such an invitation at least
90 days before the voting day “in order to allow an adequate
preparation for the deployment of the Electoral Observation
Mission”.
Meanwhile
Luphumzo Kebeni, spokesperson for the South African Parliament,
has said that South Africa will “definitely” send a multi-party
team of parliamentary observers. Kebeni confirmed that
the South African Parliament will also send a representative
to join the SADC observer team.
Dr Kasuka
Mutukwa, secretary general of the SADC parliamentary forum
(SADC-PF) which criticised the 2002 presidential elections
in Zimbabwe, said from Windhoek the forum was expecting an
invitation” and would like to send a team of 35 members of
parliament.
The Election
Institute of Southern Africa (Eisa), which monitors all elections
in the region, will decide this week who is to lead its team
of 40 observers. However none of the would-be observer
missions has received an invitation from Harare yet. Miss
Sa Ngidi of Eisa said an invitation was a pre-requisite and
if they did not receive one they would definitely complain
to Zimbabwe’s electoral commission.
Zimbabwe’s
main opposition party, the Movement for Democratic Change
(MDC), said that the refusal to invite observers in time showed
that Mugabe has “skeletons in the closet”. Priscilla
Misihairabwi-Mushonga, shadow minister of foreign affairs,
said in Harare that the African Union has also not been invited
yet and “it is clear that the (Zimbabwean) government is not
at all serious about observers”.
(See the
report in New24 (SA): www.news24.com 10.02.05,
also carried on ZWNEWS: www.zwnews.com)
Note –
under Section 14 of the recently enacted Electoral Act, an
“Observers’ Accreditation Committee” is set up whose members
are appointed by Mugabe and his ministers. This entirely
partisan body is given absolute discretion in respect of who
to authorise to observe the election. Therefore, apart
from the late issuing of invitations to regional and other
observer missions, it remains to be seen whether Harare will
accept the members appointed to these missions by the regional
bodies concerned. |
7.10
(Host government responsible for) issuing invitation
… to SADC 90 (ninety) days before the voting day in order
to allow an adequate preparation for the deployment of the
Electoral Observation Mission
7.12
(Host government responsible for) accreditation of the
members of SADC Electoral Observation Mission on a non-discriminatory
basis
|
| 11.02.05 |
SADC
TROIKA SNUBBED
Southern
African Development Community (SADC) leaders who planned to
assess electoral conditions in Zimbabwe last month were unable
to proceed with their mission when authorities in Harare proved
reluctant hosts.
Diplomatic
sources disclosed that a SADC troika comprising South African
President Thabo Mbeki, Lesotho Prime Minister Phakalitha Mosisili,
and outgoing Namibian President Sam Nujoma had been expected
to meet Robert Mugabe on January 17 in Harare in connection
with the election, but were unable to fulfil their mission.
The trip was aborted when the leaders failed to secure a confirmation
from Harare.
After
the failure of the SADC troika leaders to secure an appointment
with Mugabe, SADC then decided to send a technical team, including
legal experts, to assess the situation. However this team
is also still awaiting clearance from Harare. All the signs
are that Mugabe is extremely uncomfortable with the most unwelcome
spotlight now being focused on the skewed political landscape
and profoundly flawed electoral process in Zimbabwe.
(See the
report in Zimbabwe Independent: www.theindependent.co.zw
11.02.05) |
7.5
(Government to) take all necessary measures and precautions
to prevent the perpetration of fraud, rigging or any other
illegal practices throughout the whole electoral process,
in order to maintain peace and security
7.8
(Government to) ensure the transparency and integrity
of the entire electoral process by facilitating the deployment
of representatives of political parties … at polling and counting
stations and by accrediting national and/other observers/monitors
|
| 08.02.05
|
VILLAGERS
TOLD “BACK ZANU-PF OR STARVE”
Opposition
Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) party officials in Matabeleland
South have accused traditional chiefs of forcing their subjects
to back the ruling ZANU-PF party, threatening to deny government-supplied
maize to those who refuse.
To be
allowed to buy cheaper-priced maize from the ZANU-PF-controlled
Grain Marketing Board (GMB), starving villagers must have
their names on a food assistance register kept by the chief.
Chiefs also issue letters authorising the GMB to sell maize
to their subjects. The GMB is the only company permitted
to trade in maize and is the only institution supplying subsidized
maize to the majority of hungry Zimbabweans after the government
barred international food agencies from doing so.
According
to opposition officials, chiefs in Tsholotsho, Umzingwane,
Insiza and other constituencies in the province have told
their subjects to attend ZANU-PF campaign rallies only, with
those who defy their orders having their names removed from
the food register. Mtloliki Sibanda, MDC member of parliament
for Tsholotsho, said villagers had little option but to abide
by the chiefs’ orders or they starve.
(See the
report on Zim Online: www.zimonline.co.za
08.02.05)
(Also
see pay hike story on page 5 of this report) |
2.1.3
Political tolerance 4.1.1.
Constitutional and legal guarantees of freedom and rights
of the citizens
4.1.2
Conducive environment for free, fair and peaceful elections
7.5
(Government to) take all necessary measures and precautions
to prevent the perpetration of fraud, rigging
or any other illegal practices throughout the whole electoral
process …
|
| 11.02.05
|
MILITARY
DECLARE “NO GO” AREAS FOR MDC
Robert
Mugabe’s ZANU-PF government has barred opposition and independent
candidates in next month’s parliamentary elections from canvassing
for support among uniformed forces – long recognized as the
bedrock of ZANU-PF’s 25-year grip on power.
Commanders
at army, police and prison camps have in the past few weeks
refused the candidates permission to hold meetings or to distribute
flyers in the camps where thousands of service personnel live
with their families. ZANU-PF candidates on the other
hand can enter the camps freely to campaign for their party.
An example
of the blatantly partisan stance of the military in Zimbabwe
is provided by the refusal of the police authorities to permit
independent candidate Margaret Dongo from entering the Tomlinson
Depot in the Harare Central constituency where she is standing.
Tomlinson Depot is one of no less than five large camps and
barracks in Harare Central constituency. Residents of
the camps make up close to 50 per cent of the registered voters
in the constituency.
Harare
Lawyer and MDC legislator Tendai Biti was refused entry to
Chikurubi Prison Complex east of the capital. He said:
“It is unconstitutional and immoral to bar the opposition
from campaigning in camps and barracks.”
Just before
the 2002 presidential election controversially won by Mugabe,
the top commanders of Zimbabwe’s army, air force, police,
prison and secret service declared in a joint statement that
they were not going to back the winner in that poll if that
person did not fight in Zimbabwe’s 1970s independence war.
The statement was seen as a clear threat to stage a coup if
MDC leader Morgan Tsvangirai, who did not fight the war, won.
(See the
report in Zim Online: www.zimonline.co.za
11.02.05) |
2.1.1
Full participation of citizens in the political process
2.1.2
Freedom of association
2.1.3
Political tolerance
2.1.6
Equal opportunity to exercise the right to vote and be voted
for
4.1.2 Conducive environment for free, fair and peaceful
elections
7.4
(Government to) safeguard the human and civil liberties of
all citizens, including the freedom of movement,
assembly, association, expression and campaigning …
|
| 06.02.05 |
1
400 PER CENT PAY HIKE FOR MUGABE’S TROOPS
Less
than two months ahead of the parliamentary elections scheduled
for March 31, Robert Mugabe’s ZANU-PF government has awarded
huge pay increases – up to 1 400 per cent – to the war veteran’s
militia, ex-political prisoners and traditional chiefs.
These
moves immediately drew accusations that Mugabe was paying
off key political groups with a critical role in the ZANU-PF
election strategy of intimidating opposition voters.
In the
last parliamentary elections in 2000 and presidential ballot
of 2002, so-called war veterans and the youth militia led
a countrywide reign of terror against the opposition Movement
for Democratic Change (MDC), and are considered responsible
for most of the murders of about 300 people in the campaigns.
Chiefs and their hierarchy of village headmen are accused
of using their powerful influence over impoverished rural
communities to force people to vote for Mugabe’s ZANU-PF.
Ironically
Mugabe accuses the MDC of soliciting Western finance “to buy
votes”. The ZWNEWS headline for the
report on Mugabe’s attack on the MDC reads: “’Zimbabwe
can’t be bought’, says vote buyer”.
(Reported
from News24 (SA): www.news24.com 06.02.05
and in ZWNEWS www.zwnews.com 08.02.05) |
4.1.2
Conducive environment for free, fair and peaceful elections
|
| 10.02.05 |
YOUTH
MILITIA DEPLOYED IN MDC STRONGHOLDS
More
than 2 000 youth militia have been deployed at Kamativi in
the opposition stronghold Matabeleland North province ahead
of the March elections.
The youths,
accused by churches and human rights groups of hunting down,
torturing and raping opposition supporters, have already begun
patrolling villages in Binga, Hwange, near the tourist resort
of Victoria Falls and other parts of the province.
Opposition
Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) member of parliament
for Hwange West constituency, Jealous Sansole, said that people
in his area were now afraid to attend meetings called by his
party since the deployment of the youths.
Sansole
also revealed that many of these youths, who have been trained
in violence and indoctrinated with ZANU-PF propaganda to the
point at which they recognize no other authority in Zimbabwe
apart from Robert Mugabe and his party, have been illegally
registered to vote in his constituency under which Kamativi
falls.
Under
the new Electoral Act, voters are registered in the constituency
in which they live, and in a parliamentary election should
cast their ballot only in that constituency.
In a damning
report on human rights abuses in the country, the African
Commission for Human and Peoples’ Rights singled out the youth
militias as among the chief human rights abusers and called
for their disbandment. The report was formally adopted
by the African Union last week.
(Reported
in Zim Online: www.zimonline.co.za
10.02.05) |
4.1.2
Conducive environment for free, fair and peaceful elections
7.4
(Government to) safeguard the human and civil liberties
of all citizens including the freedom of movement, assembly,
association, expression and campaigning …
7.5
(Government to) take all necessary measures and precautions
to prevent the perpetration of fraud, rigging or any
other illegal practices throughout the whole electoral process,
in order to maintain peace and security |
| 11.02.05 |
VIOLENCE
HOTS UP AHEAD OF POLL
A
wave of political violence in Zimbabwe, highlighted by an
attack on people leaving an opposition rally in Nyanga last
week, is expected to intensify in the final seven weeks of
an already bitter and violent election campaign.
Members
of the Zimbabwe National Army are reported to have assaulted
15 Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) members attending
a campaign rally addressed by a party candidate, Douglas Mwonzora,
in Nyanga on February 6.
Hundreds
of followers of Mugabe’s ZANU-PF party ambushed the opposition
supporters after the rally, where the incumbent opposition
candidate vowed the MDC would end the “reign of terror” if
it came to power.
The incident
capped a week in which police arrested Zengeza MDC candidate
Godrich Chimbaira, militants attacked an opposition office
in Bulawayo and self-styled liberation war veterans killed
a white farmer near Banket and forced his family to flee their
farm.
(See the
report in the Zimbabwe Independent: www.theindependent.co.zw
11.02.05) |
2.1.2 Freedom
of association
2.1.3
Political tolerance
4.1.1
Constitutional and legal guarantees of freedom and rights
of the citizens
4.1.2
Conducive environment for free, fair and peaceful elections
7.4
(Government to) safeguard the human and civil liberties
of all citizens including the freedom of movement, assembly,
association, expression and campaigning …
7.7
(Government to) ensure that adequate security is
provided to all parties participating in the elections |
| 06.02.05 |
OPPOSITION
BLASTS 20-FOLD HIKE IN ELECTION FEES Zimbabwe’s
main opposition party, the Movement for Democratic Change
(MDC), has accused Robert Mugabe’s government of trying to
subvert democracy through a 20-fold increase in the deposit
fees for candidates contesting the March 31 parliamentary
polls.
“This
is a clear attempt to use money to prevent democracy,” the
MDC secretary general, Welshman Ncube, said. Twenty-four
hours after his party had announced it would be contesting
the election the government issued a notice hiking the registration
fee for a candidate from Z$100 000 to Z$2 million. At
the same time candidates wishing to obtain a copy of the voters’
roll will now have to pay Z$1 million against Z$200 000 previously.
Ncube said the MDC would need to raise Z$260 million by March
8 in order to contest in all the 120 constituencies.
(See the
report in the Sunday Argus (SA): http://www.capeargus.co.za/
February 6, also carried on ZWNEWS: www.zwnews.com)
NOTE:
Under Zimbabwean law, political parties cannot receive foreign
funding. While there are no non-partisan law enforcement
agencies to enforce this provision with respect to the ruling
ZANU-PF party, the opposition parties are rigorously scrutinized
by the Central Intelligence Organization (CIO) and other state
agents. The MDC’s financial resources are severely strained
after contesting a number of cases involving the legal harassment
of their members and challenging in the courts the results
of both the 2000 parliamentary and 2002 presidential elections
– cases which have still not been determined by the country’s
top judges, most of whom have demonstrated a clear bias in
favour of the interests of the ruling ZANU-PF. |
2.1.1
Full participation of citizens in the political process
2.1.6
Equal opportunity to exercise the right to vote and be
voted for
2.1.7
Independence of the Judiciary and impartiality of the
electoral institutions
7.3
(Government to) establish impartial, all-inclusive,
competent and accountable electoral bodies …. as well
as competent legal entities including effective constitutional
courts to arbitrate in the event of disputes arising from
the conduct of elections
|
| 08.02.05 |
AU
ADOPTS REPORT CRITICAL OF MUGABE’S HUMAN RIGHTS RECORD
It is
now official. Zimbabwe has a poor human rights record,
its police force is politicized, and its security and media
legislation are at odds with the freedom of expression and
association. For the first time member states of the
African Union have officially sanctioned criticism of Robert
Mugabe’s human rights record.
Zimbabwe
Lawyers for Human Rights has confirmed that the executive
council of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights
(ACHPR) has adopted a three-year-old report on Zimbabwe’s
human rights record, and it has now become a part of the official
record of the African Union.
The ACHPR
recommended in its executive summary that the Zimbabwe government
should ensure the following:
- the
Judiciary is independent of executive control or influence
- youth
militia are dismantled and their camps closed
- sections
of security and media legislation are reviewed
- the
establishment of an independent electoral commission
- police
are freed of political control
- NGOs
involved with human rights and governance are permitted
to operate freely
“We hope
that the Zimbabwe government takes notice of the recommendations
from the AU,” said Arnold Tsunga, director of Zimbabwe Lawyers
for Human Rights.
(Reported
in the Cape Times (SA): http://www.capetimes.co.za/
8.02.05 and quoted in ZWNEWS: www.zwnews.com) |
2.1.7
Independence of the Judiciary
4.1.2
Conducive environment for free, fair and peaceful elections
2.1.5
Equal opportunity for all political parties to access
the state media
7.3
Establish impartial, all inclusive, competent and accountable
national electoral bodies …
|
| |
ZIMBABWE
ELECTORAL LEGISLATION :
SADC
CHECK LIST
SOKWANELE
has also now produced a detailed analysis of the Zimbabwean
statutes that are in breach of the SADC Protocol on Democratic
Elections and the policy breaches by the ZANU-PF government. Entitled
“ZIMBABWE ELECTORAL LEGISLATION : SADC CHECK LIST”, the document
can be seen on our website at www.sokwanele.com |
|
Note:
The fraudulent and violence-ridden elections of 2000 and 2002 were
narrowly won by Robert Mugabe and his ZANU-PF party,
who have maintained their iron grip on the country by using strategies
designed to annihilate all forms of opposition.
As many independent
commentators have already pointed out, there is no prospect that
the parliamentary elections scheduled for March 31 will be fair
and free. Equally, given the magnitude of the task and the few weeks
remaining before the poll, there is no prospect of the regimes
compliance with the SADC Protocol on Democratic Elections. Indeed,
in recent months we have witnessed a steady movement by the regime
away from compliance with any international norms for democratic
elections. Behind the façade of democracy which the regime
likes to put on all their activities, we have seen a deliberate
and systematic attempt to subvert every institution of government
in order to secure in the forthcoming poll a pre-determined result
favouring ZANU-PF.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|