THE NGO NETWORK ALLIANCE PROJECT - an online community for Zimbabwean activists  
 View archive by sector
 
 
    HOME THE PROJECT DIRECTORYJOINARCHIVESEARCH E:ACTIVISMBLOGSMSFREEDOM FONELINKS CONTACT US
 

 


Back to Index

ZESN holds a training workshop for journalists on local government elections reporting
Zimbabwe Election Support Network (ZESN)
August 26, 2003

Journalists have attended and been party to a lot of workshops on an array of issues. The workshop which was organised by the ZESN's Media and Information Taskforce was held from the 15th to 16th August at Lake View Inn Hotel-Kariba was aimed at capacitating journalists, particularly those who report on elections, with the skills and knowledge of covering elections in view of the Urban and Council elections, scheduled to take place in the near future. However, knowledge on covering elections on its own is not adequate. Journalists need to be equipped with practical skills, ideas and knowledge of other guiding principles such as laws and standards and ethics of practice in the process of reporting on elections. The Election Reporting workshop sought to impart the above - mentioned as well as facilitate the sharing of knowledge and experiences on election coverage amongst the journalists.

The workshop was designed to be highly participatory in order to give maximum benefit to all participants. As a result, most of the sessions were characterised by heated debates on the issues. During the introductory sessions, the journalists showed a sense of awareness of what is expected of them and an appreciation of the issues that the workshop sought to address. Most acknowledged that the individual stood to benefit from the interaction and sharing of knowledge.

The morning sessions were conducted in plenary with either of the facilitators giving platform to the participants to express their views while the facilitator moderated. These sessions proved to be quite exciting and most participants evidently benefited from the debates.

The afternoon session (on day one) also proved to be quite interactive as journalists got to share their views on smaller groups and presented their findings in plenary. It was quite interesting to note that all the groups had similar findings and they concurred on issues relating to maintenance of ethics and standards but differed on the implementation of these at house level.

Day two was also packed with debate as journalists sought to link issues discussed in day one with the Urban Councils Act and other laws that govern journalists. All sessions on this day were in plenary.

The workshop managed to address all the issues as set out in the objectives. The workshop ended at 3:30p.m on Saturday after which, the participants were free to sightsee in the Kariba neighbourhood.

Observations

  • Attendance - the workshop was attended by reporters from most forms of media, particularly most print media houses and from the ZBC. Most newspaper houses were represented including those from smaller towns. Equally encouraging was all journalists’ willingness to participate in an objective manner. All journalists present for the workshop attended all sessions.
  • Media polarisation - also noteworthy was the issue of polarisation, which constantly came up as a bone of contention in relation to standards of reporting and access to information as well as on how to report issues. It was however acknowledged that there was not much the journalist could do in as far as house policies are concerned but to try and be objective as far as possible using the three principles of ‘fairness, balance and objectivity’. In regards to debate, most participants showed tolerance to each other’s differing views and contributed fairly reasonable answers that showed understanding of what is expected of them
  • Coverage of elections - of note was the fact that reporters regarded some anomalies that they espouse during the coverage of elections as ‘necessary’ given the polarised media environment, which also to some extent informs media house policies. Some were adamant as to the practicality of changing some of the ‘unethical standards’ as they highlighted that it was part of the survival kit of a journalist. On an individual level though, most reporters appreciated the need for journalists to be to be aware of what was required of them during election period. Some admitted having done unethical things during elections but also admitted that change was subject to the circumstances that the journalist is caught in. some of the practical cases were said to border on ‘bread and butter issues’, for instance, covering elections without accreditation.
  • Urban Councils Act - most journalists were not aware of the specific provisions of the Urban Councils Act and how it should serve the local government structures. An analysis of this Act provided the journalists the platform to critique the various anomalies within the act and in terms of how it is applied. Journalists were urged to interrogate the Act to the advantage of the public for the forthcoming Urban Councils elections.
  • Electoral laws and reform - Provisions of various laws were not common ground for the journalists, especially laws that directly touch on the operations of the journalists during election time. Most journalists were familiar with media laws but showed little understanding of how electoral laws work. While it was a common agreement that journalists had a role to play in the electoral reform process, most were not clear on the ideas of how journalists could go about it. It was suggested by most that there was need for a workshop where journalists could benefit from the discussions on electoral laws and electoral reform.
  • Access to electoral information - most participants noted that in terms of accessing electoral information, the Registrar-General’s office proved to be the most difficult to access and the most frustrating. Most did not regard CSOs as an integral part or important source of information on elections. Participants however noted that, when necessary, they did not have problems accessing information from CSOs but had difficulty with those who are affiliated with certain political parties due to some house policies, for instance, the ZBC may not contact CSOs whom government considers as aligned to the opposition.
  • Election news-writing - while journalists seemed conversant on the practical electoral process, most interrogated the actual process of capturing election stories and the challenges of making such stories newsworthy and also highly informative. Most were of the view that the life-span of electoral stories was very limited and did not offer a lot of variety. However, several ways of elongating these were proffered and possible areas to be written about during election time were interrogated. However, it is my view that journalists would benefit from a practical workshop on electoral reporting vis-à-vis the actual story writing process.

Recommendations

  1. As was noted by the participants, there is need for ZESN to come up with a monitoring mechanism (in conjunction with MMPZ) to assess journalists reporting during the electoral period. Focus should be on those who attended the training. For future purposes, the report thereof should be used as the port of call in correcting the journalists and those to be trained in the future.
  2. A follow up workshop should be considered at a later date in order to feed back to the journalists on their performance and fall back on some of the observed mistakes or the positive aspects observed during the monitored electoral period. This would allow ZESN to gauge the effectiveness of the training through rapport with the concerned parties.
  3. ZESN should consider holding election training workshops or refresher courses for the journalists on an annual basis especially on electoral laws/reforms.
  4. Journalists need to also be capacitated with the actual writing skills of election news and how to be both creative and informative about issues relating to elections (it was observed that especially during the pre-election period, most stories were mere profiles of selected candidates). ZESN might consider election story-writing as part of the training course in the future.
  5. A report such as the one recommended in 1. should be compiled as a resource book for future use by journalists covering elections.

For more information:
Ellen Kandororo, Information Officer
Media and Communication Programme

E-mail: ellenk@zesn.org.zw

Visit the ZESN fact sheet

Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.

TOP