THE NGO NETWORK ALLIANCE PROJECT - an online community for Zimbabwean activists  
 View archive by sector
 
 
    HOME THE PROJECT DIRECTORYJOINARCHIVESEARCH E:ACTIVISMBLOGSMSFREEDOM FONELINKS CONTACT US
 

 


Back to Index

Lobby the Bishops and Church co-ordinators in SA
Network of Independent Monitors (NIM)
May 28, 2002


Dear Friends,

I am the senior program officer for NIM ( Network of Independent Monitors ) a Human Rights NGO in KwaZulu Natal, South Africa.

During the 2002 Presidential elections in Zimbabwe, NIM deployed 55 monitors throughout the length and breadth of Zimbabwe. We were not given accreditation but we monitored anyway attaching ourselves to NGO’s and church activists.

It was not surprising therefore that our reports differed very widely from the official SA observer mission report. NIM has in recent weeks been trying to lobby the Church leaders in SA in particular the KwaZulu Natal church leaders and the SACC.

The multi-sectoral committee representing SA Government, SACC, labour , and industry made up the SA observer mission. It would appear that the mission itself is divided on the final version of their report ( few have admitted to this).

NIM has been trying to lobby the churches here to take a stronger position with regards to Zimbabwe however it would appear that the SACC leadership seems to hold a very similar view to that of the SA Government.

On Tuesday 21 May 2002, I was asked to present the report to the Kwazulu Natal Church Leaders group. Present at that meeting was Dr Molefe Tsele ( SACC -Secretary General) who did a presentation as part of the official SA observer mission. Dr Tsele dismissed us as being mouth pieces for the opposition MDC. His presentation was no different from that of a politician defending a SA government position. It did not appear as though a Church person was speaking. He referred to the video " Free and Fair" as MDC propaganda. He also indicated his feelings that almost all NGOs are biased in favour of the opposition and therefore any reports by them should be viewed with caution.

The KwaZulu Natal Church leaders (we believe) feel very strongly about the situation in Zimbabwe. We are given to understand that they want the SACC to take a proactive role in influencing government and Churches here and in Zimbabwe to do more to stop the violation of human rights in Zimbabwe.

We are informed that a full meeting of the SACC is to take place on 5 June 2002 and the Zim Crisis is on the agenda.

My appeal to all who read this is to send emails to the Bishops and Church coordinators listed below, with information on what has been happening in your particular area and your feelings about the perception that NGOs in Zimbabwe are biased etc. It will also be useful to appeal to the Bishops not to allow the church to be influenced by politicians but rather they should defend the rights of the victims.

I believe that by you having direct contact with our Bishops, you will be in a position to greatly influence their perceptions on what is really going on in Zim.

Attached please find the names and email addresses of the Bishops.

Good luck and thanks for all the hard work you guys are doing.

Regards

Selvan Chetty
Senior Program Officer
Network of Independent Monitors
Tel: +27 39 6825 869
E
mail selvanc@venturenet.co.za


EMAIL ADDRESSES OF SOUTH AFRICAN BISHOPS

1. Bishop Mvume Dandala - 011 – 403 4292 - presbish@methchurch.org.za

2. Bishop Reuben Phillips - 031 – 3092066 - rphillips@cpsa.org.za

3. Bishop Makhaye - 036 – 6373361 - makhaye@mweb.co.za

4. Bishop Purity Malinga - 031 – 2023662

5. Bishop Elija Twala - 031 – 5031674 - bishsuff@mweb.co.za

6. Bishop Njongokulu Ndungane - 021 – 7612531 - archbish@bishopscourt-cpsa.org.za

7. Dr Molefe Tsele - 011 – 2417815 - tmm@sacc.org.za

8. Cardinal Wilfred Napier - 031 – 3031417 - chancery@durban-archdiocese.co.za

9. Mr Neville Gabriel - 012-3236458 - ngabriel@sacbc.org.za

Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.

TOP