|
Back to Index
Progress
to gender equality in education
Extracted from Insights Education, Issue #3
September
2004
In 2000, eight Millennium
Development Goals were adopted by the international community as a way
of measuring development progress in all countries up to 2015. The second
Millennium Development Goal (MDG 2) seeks to achieve universal primary
education for all, and the third (MDG 3) is concerned with the right of
women and girls to enjoy equal educational opportunities with boys and
men (see box below).
The MDGs reflect an
international understanding of education as critical to wider processes
of achieving gender equality and the empowerment of women. For example,
research shows that education enables girls and women to better understand
and take care of their own reproductive health, better protect themselves
against HIV/AIDS and raise healthier children who then also go to school.
It also enables them to contribute to the economic security of their family,
community and society. Yet equal opportunities and schooling outcomes,
and female empowerment through decision-making power and control of resources,
cannot be achieved through access to primary schooling alone.
Since the 1990 World
Declaration on Education for All (EFA), there has been significant progress
made in addressing gender disparities in access to schooling. This has
been particularly impressive in countries such as Benin, Bangladesh and
Chad. Also in Mali, Mauritania and Morocco, enrolment rates for girls
have increased by over 30%, making considerable progress towards achieving
MDG 2. In Bangladesh, access to girls' education has increased through
initiatives such as community schools for girls, and training of women
teachers.
There is some indication
that achieving equal access to education for boys and girls (gender parity
in enrolments) leads towards progress in the other EFA targets. However,
Figure 1 concludes that of the 128 countries with available data, less
than half are likely to achieve gender parity by 2005.
Furthermore, more
than 40% of the countries are at risk of not doing so by 2015.
As gender equality is a complex issue to measure, it is very difficult
to assess the extent to which these increases in girls' enrolments translate
into the empowerment of girls and women. Eliminating gender disparities
in education is certainly an important achievement, but one that cannot
be considered separately to the actual schooling experience of girls and
the long-term impact on issues such as future job opportunities, political
participation, and the likelihood of community leadership.
Assessing progress
of the MDGs
There will be
an official review of the MDGs in 2005, and Task Forces have produced
interim reports on each of the goals areas, making initial suggestions
for possible future adjustments.
The Gender Equality
Task Force report is radical and controversial in its suggestions: although
education is critical, on its own it is nonetheless insufficient in addressing
the complex barriers to women's empowerment. The report recommends adding
additional targets. The Education Task Force report also recommends broadening
the targets, in particular widening the scope of MDG 2 to cover a complete
cycle of basic education of at least 5 years, and placing additional emphasis
on secondary education. The two reports together stress the importance
of education, and the multiple challenges in ensuring that all children
benefit from it. MDG 2 will not be achieved unless substantial policy
changes are made. Furthermore, for education to be a force for achieving
women's empowerment (MDG 3), we need to not only ensure access to schooling
for girls, but also provide appropriate and relevant education, making
sure that schooling is an empowering and learning experience for girls
and boys.
Enrolment is not the
only barrier to education, but retention and successful completion of
a full cycle of studies are also critical for girls and boys. Other important
issues include conflict, poverty, cultural practices, the availability
of schools, syllabus design and the consequences of HIV/AIDS.
Working at community
level
At the community
level, efforts need to be made to ensure that there is a demand for education
and schools, that families are motivated to send their girls to school
and that they are confident they will be safe there. Economic barriers
such as school fees, uniform and transportation costs have to be alleviated,
as do costs related to lack of earnings as a result of sending girls to
school. Puberty and sexuality add another layer to the challenge of achieving
gender equality in education, and especially so in contexts where schoolgirls
are vulnerable to sexual violence, to unwanted pregnancy, HIV/AIDS and
sexually-transmitted diseases.
It is encouraging
that the MDGs and the EFA targets, have increased access to and awareness
of girls' education. Collaborative initiatives have started to promote
programmes and policies on gender equality in education. However, to ensure
that increased activity will achieve maximum impact, it is necessary to
examine what the collaborations are and to make sure that the perspectives
of those involved within community-based activities are not lost.
No matter how local
they are, community-level approaches to achieving gender equality in and
through education are related to broader national education policy. The
articles in this issue of insights education highlight the complexity
of working with non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and community-based
organisations (CBOs) and focus on barriers to girls' education. The articles
present some new perspectives on gender equality in education and also
highlight the need for clear and collaborative approaches. Barriers to
girls' education such as a lack of sanitary materials for girls in rural
Uganda, highlighted by FAWE, require work with girls, their families,
communities and education authorities in order to provide long-term solutions.
Challender provides
a timely overview of measuring where the world is at in relation to gender
parity and equality in education. Although progress has been made in numerous
countries, and in some regions of others, we need to be reminded that
around 59 million girls remain excluded from school (see Figure 2). As
Mazurana's article illustrates, girls who have been active with fighting
forces form one significant group of girls who are mostly unable to complete
their studies. There are many reasons including poverty, exclusion and
lack of support from their community. Community perceptions of girls -
and particularly of menstruation - are also identified barriers for the
girls FAWE works with, combined with a lack of family resources to spend
on sanitary protection for girls. Issues of menstruation are also of concern
to Vacha, working with pre-adolescent girls in India, who have been 'invisible'
to mainstream policy. This article draws attention to inequalities in
food distribution and to the associated health issues for these girls
and advocates for government resources to address these.
Winthrop works with
home-based teachers in Afghanistan and relates how they are critical in
providing access to education for girls in a context where the gains made
since the fall of the Taliban remain fragile. In Peru, girls' access to
education is relatively high and yet, as Ames points out, there are significant
school, family and community issues which mean that low attendance and
eventual early drop-out are common. These issues are faced not only in
Peru but also in other countries of Latin America and beyond. Garrow and
Kikampikaho are also concerned with community level activities in organising
girls' education.
Each article adds
a different dimension to the complex issue of gender equality in education,
such as girls' experiences in times of conflict, puberty and menstruation,
teachers' own experiences and the importance of forming collaborative
networks. The articles also provide some concrete recommendations for
future action.
In conclusion, although
the target focus of MDG 3 on education cannot address all the barriers
to women's equality and empowerment, the priority that education for gender
equality has been given on the international stage is encouraging. The
MDG focus can be used to make strong demands for education but it cannot
stand alone. It has to be linked to other international instruments for
women's equality such as the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination
Against Women (CEDAW) and the Beijing Platform for Action, which make
connections between critical issues for girls such as poverty, health,
violence, armed conflict, education and training.
While taking forward
commitment to MDG 3, the experiences of girls, their parents, teachers,
programme staff and researchers working at the community level need always
to be taken into account. The combined power of MDG 2 with MDG 3 needs
to demand substantially increased resources from governments
(donor and otherwise),
international financial institutions, international NGOs and other donors.
It also requires increased activity by governments and their partners
such as NGOs, CBOs and communities in the education sector in general,
and with a special focus on girls. Comprehensive monitoring, evaluation
and programme research needs to document the impact of different interventions,
identify particularly promising strategies and analyse the transfer of
local level programme knowledge to policy developments. These are critical
components of what is required, in order to assess the long and short-term
impacts of what is being done to make gender equality a worldwide reality.
Jackie Kirk UNESCO
Centre School of Education, University of Ulster Coleraine, BT52 1SA Northern
Ireland T +514 276 7412 or +44 (0)28 703 24137 jackie.kirk@mail.mcgill.ca
Stephanie Garrow McGill
University, Faculty of Education, 3700 McTavish Street Montreal Quebec,
H3A 1Y2 Canada T + 514 525 5922
sgarrow@videotron.ca
Jackie Kirk is a Research
Fellow at the UNESCO Centre, University of Ulster and Research Associate
of the McGill Centre for Research and Teaching on Women. Her research
focuses on education, gender and conflict, with a particular focus on
the experiences of adolescent girls and women teachers in schools.
Stephanie Garrow is
a Doctoral Candidate at McGill University. Her research explores models
of inter-organisational relationships that facilitate community participation
in gender equality initiatives, with a particular interest in girls' education
programmes.
Millennium Development
Goal 2:
Achieve universal primary education Target: Ensure that by 2015, children
everywhere, boys and girls alike, will be able to complete a full course
of primary schooling.
Millennium Development
Goal 3:
Promote gender equality and empower women Target: Eliminate gender disparity
in primary and secondary education, preferably by 2005, and to all levels
of education no later than 2015. www.developmentgoals.org
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|