| THE NGO NETWORK ALLIANCE PROJECT - an online community for Zimbabwean activists | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Performance
and projection of the 2011 budget Download
this document http://www.zimtreasury.org/budget.cfm Introduction The 2011 budget presented and approved by Parliament sought to cover critical infrastructure projects as well as improvement in service delivery. The capital budget estimate stands at about US$551 million representing 20% of the total budget of US$2.746 billion. The budget provision for service delivery amounts to US$1.346 billion with emphasis being given to improvement of service delivery in the health and education sectors as well as social safety nets. Recognition was also given to other sectors including security taking into account their critical role in the economy. The approved budget provides for US$1.4 billion for employment costs, including the wage bill, as well as pension, medical aid and social security contributions representing 45% or 14.5% of total expenditure and GDP respectively. Implementation of
the 2011 budget remains
anchored on the principle of cash budgeting system and capacity to collect
revenues projected to be around US$2.746 billion by year-end. The revenue
collections achieved on a monthly basis determine the extent of disbursements
towards the budgeted items, the first charge being towards employment
costs. The monthly bill for employment costs now averages US$120 million
in comparison to the average monthly revenue collections of US$229 million. As at May 2011, Budget disbursements stand at US$930 million which is 34% of the budget estimate of US$2,746 billion. Revenue outturn to end of May 2011 amounted to US$1.023 billion and was below the target for the same period of US$1.145 billion, giving a negative variance of US$177 million. The Table below gives the Budget outturn to May 2011:
From the above Table, it is self evident that employment costs continue to crowd out other expenditures, particularly development programmes. What appears to be a positive variance between revenues and expenditures is an accumulation of what Treasury has recourse in to meet employment costs in the subsequent month. Without such a cashflow, payments of salaries in the subsequent month by due dates would be unachievable. Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
|