|
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
Marange, Chiadzwa and other diamond fields and the Kimberley Process - Index of articles
How
diamond proceeds will be shared
The
Zimbabwean and Christian Science Monitor
August 21, 2010
View this article
on The Zimbabwean website
| Organisation |
%
royalty |
| Zimbabwe
Government |
10 |
| Minerals
Marketing Corporation of Zimbabwe |
0.8 |
| Zimbabwe
Mining Development Corporation |
2.5 |
| Mbada |
5 |
| Canadile |
5 |
| Production
costs |
77.42 |
Diamond critics have
begun analysing the effects of the sale of Zimbabwe's diamonds recently
and how it is likely to benefit society.
Some international diamond
activists have warned the international community of buying the
blood diamonds, saying doing so will see more human rights abuses.
Zimbabwe on August 11
sold 900 000 carats or 180 kilogrammes of Marange - Chiadzwa diamonds,
which realised US71 million or US$ 80 per kilogramme. Above there
is a table which shows how the royalties will be broken down, with
the bulk of the proceeds going to funding "production costs".
It is not clear who will benefit from these production costs. The
Zimbabwe Mining Development Corporation (ZMDC) will receive 2,5
percent but because it belongs to government, it will pay it a dividend,
according to Mines Minister Obert Mpofu.
The current stockpile
of diamonds has been put at 900 kilogrammes or 4,5 million carats
with an estimated worth of US1,7 billion.
"But 4.5 million
at US$80 per carat comes to a lousy US$360 million and according
to the split above the government will only realise US$36 million
in royalties. Perhaps what they meant was that had the gem quality
diamonds not been filtered out for sale to buyers in Manica, Mozambique,
then the average per carat would be far higher," said a critic.
"It also does not
help build confidence in the proposed split of diamond proceeds
to learn that the chief executive and general manager of the Zimbabwe
Mining Development Corporation Dominic Mubayiwa and three of his
top men at the Corporation have been suspended for two months."
Mubayiwa, his group finance director Robert Karemba, group technical
services manager Albert Chitambo and corporate secretary and legal
advisor Tichaona Muhonde were suspended on 26 July 2010 after the
huge three storey home Mubayiwa is building in Borrowdale came under
the spotlight. The four were suspended by the new ZMDC board chairman
Godwills Masimirembwa.
"Some of us will
recall this was the gentleman (Masimirembwa) who was in charge of
reducing shop selling prices during our hyper-inflationary era and
it was the pursuit of this policy that led to the likes of Makro
and other stores being "legally" looted of all their working
capital after prices of goods were reduced and these goods were
then bought by the team and their cronies who had enforced the price
reductions," said the critic.
A US-based Rapaport
Diamond Trading Network announced a Zimbabwe diamond
ban last week. Rapaport is one of the largest buyers of diamonds
in the US.
"I think the significance
of this is that the US diamond market is one of the biggest in the
world, and when they say they will only purchase a diamond when
they are sure that diamond is not from the Marange diamond fields
in Zimbabwe, they are taking a moral stand," says Tiseke Kasambala,
a senior researcher on Zimbabwe for Human Rights Watch in Johannesburg.
The Christian Sceince
Monitor said it was not a surprise that the diamond industry was
taking steps to keep politically-tainted stones out of circulation.
"The market is glutted
with diamonds, many of them coming out of Russia and other markets
that were once off limits, and movies like the action thriller "Blood
Diamond" and the real-life trial of former Liberian President
Charles Taylor for human rights crimes do nothing to improve the
image of a stone that was once considered to be the ultimate symbol
of love," it said last week.
"Yet the very same
global diamond industry watchdog created to clean up the diamond
trade in conflict zones (the Kimberley Process) has given Zimbabwe's
diamonds a clean bill of health, sending a mixed signal to consumers
looking for a guilt-free purchase. And if US diamond buyers can
do without a few hundred thousand Zimbabwean stones, then it is
also true that Zimbabwe sellers can do without 10,000 US-based diamond
traders. Which again raises the question: will this boycott work?"
"You have to ask
yourself is there another market, and my experience is that there
is always another market for minerals," says Laura Seay, an
assistant professor of political science at Morehouse College who
has studied the minerals market in conflict zones in central Africa.
"One of the flaws of the Kimberley Process is that it was designed
around conflict, not around inhumane conditions or other more ambiguous
human rights abuses such as child labour or forced labour."
One of the positive effects
of the Kimberley Process, Seay adds, is that it did manage to raise
awareness among consumers about where diamonds often come from,
and how to avoid funding conflicts with one's spending habits. "If
Rapaport can be successful in raising awareness about Zimbabwe diamonds,
then it could be effective. And it could push the Kimberley Process
to look more broadly at other human rights abuses."
Looking
east
To be sure, America is
one of the largest markets for diamonds - even in tight economic
times such as these. But there are other emerging markets, many
of them in Asia, which are experiencing rapid economic growth. Last
week, China replaced Japan as the world's second largest economy
after the US, and it stands ready to overtake the US in the coming
decade. "I think there are a lot of other buyers for diamonds
out there, such as India, which are quite keen to buy diamonds,"
says Raymond Louw, editor of the Southern Africa Report in Johannesburg.
"I think this is a going to act as a token rather than a debilitating
measure for the regime of [Zimbabwean President] Robert Mugabe."
"If [the Rapaport
group] mobilises other nations to ban our gems, then we will be
left with no other options other than embarking on the Look East
Policy, which over the past 10 years kept the country moving despite
illegal sanctions," says Zimbabwe's Minister of Mines, Obert
Mpofu in a Monitor interview.
"We will sell our
stones to countries...We have countries like China, Malaysia, Russia,
India and other Asian countries where we can market our diamonds."
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|