|
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
Inclusive government - Index of articles
From
despair to hope: Finding of the study on the state of the Zimbabwe
economy and people’s survival strategies, 2009
Mass Public
Opinion Institute (MPOI)
July 30, 2009
Download
this document
- Acrobat
PDF version (774KB)
If
you do not have the free Acrobat reader on your computer, download
it from the Adobe website by clicking
here.
Introduction
Zimbabwe’s
development trajectory has been chequered since its attainment of
Independence in1980. It country displayed great promise at first
with real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth for 1980-1981 exceeded
20% and the economy grew on average by about 4.5% between 1980 and
1990. Then in the 1990s the country had a paradigm shift in its
development path, having abandoned flirtations with some socialism
and experimented half-heartedly, some would say with World Bank/International
Monetary Fund supported Economic Structural Adjustment Programme
(ESAP). This was also abandoned at the end of the 1990s, heralding
“the deepening crisis period, 1997-2008”1. Post-2000
Zimbabwe marked a fundamental rupture with the preceding period
and the country began its descent into what to many seemed a bottomless
pit. For instance, GDP suffered a precipitous decline to -7.4 percent
in 2000 and further declined to -10.4 percent in 2003. Real GDP
growth averaged -5.9 percent between 2005 and 2007. Cumulatively,
the national economy declined by 40% in eight years. Here is Wikipedia
summarised the Zimbabwe economic situation earlier this year:
The economy
of Zimbabwe is collapsing from economic mismanagement, resulting
in 94% unemployment and hyperinflation. The economy poorly transitioned
in recent years, deteriorating from one of Africa’s strongest
economies to the world’s worst. Inflation has surpassed that
of all other nations at over 80 sextillion (although it is impossible
to calculate an accurate value), with the next highest in Ethiopia
at 41%. It currently has the lowest GDP real growth rate in an independent
country and 3rd in total (behind Palestinian territories)3.
In March 2009,
the new government
of national unity described the economy it inherited as follows:
At the epicentre
of the economic crisis, have been unprecedented levels of hyperinflation,
sustained period of negative Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth
rates, massive devaluation of the currency, low productive capacity,
loss of jobs, food shortages, poverty, massive de-industrialisation
and general despondency4.
Poverty levels
skyrocketed from 55% of the population in 1995 to 72% in 2003 with
the Gini coefficient of inequality increased from 0.53 to 0.61 in
the same period5. Hyperinflation bankrupted the government, left
more than 8 in 10 citizens destitute and decimated the country’s
farms and the manufacturing sector. Almost all primary and secondary
schools, as well as state universities, failed to open for the greater
part of 2008 and at the beginning of 2009. Teachers refused to wok
because their meagre salaries were too little even to cover their
transport costs to their work stations. Attendance by pupils dropped
to as low as 20%, the pass rates of school leavers dropped precipitously
and examinations remained unmarked for lack of resources.
In August 2008,
a cholera outbreak broke out, the worst that Africa has experienced
in recent times and it claimed 4000 lives and nearly a hundred fell
ill. This was at a time when many health services had collapsed
and even central hospitals were closed due to lack of running water,
food to feed patients, and essential medicines and supplies.
By the end of
2008, the Zimbabwe dollar had virtually collapsed and many transactions
were now being done in foreign currency and businesses refusing
to accept the local currency. To counter the effects of inflation
on the Zimbabwe dollar the Reserve Bank Governor was constantly
printing higher denominations in order to meet demand and redenominated
the Zimbabwe dollar thrice, that is, in August 2006, July 2008 and
February 2009. Then in September 2008 the central bank partially
dollarized the economy by licensing 1000 retailers and wholesalers
under the FOLIWARS scheme to sell goods in foreign currency in a
move aimed at helping businesses suffering from a chronic shortage
of foreign currency to import spare parts and foreign goods. Other
shops and service providers followed suit although they were not
authorized by the government. However, in February 2009 the economy
became fully dollarized through the adoption of multiple currencies.
This single policy move conquered the black market overnight, quelled
inflation and empty shop shelves began to fill up once more.
It was against
the above bleak and worsening background that a tripartite Global
Political Agreement (GPA) involving the three major parities
was signed on 15 September 2008 leading to the instalment of the
Inclusive
Government (IG) in February 2009. The political pact was motivated
by the crying need to re-establish economic and political stability
after a decade of vertiginous decline. This political intervention
had an immediate and positive impact. Business and the economy began
to pick up evidenced by the improved availability of goods and commodities
on shop shelves. Prices began to drop and deflation actually set
in: May 2009, inflation dropped by -3.1%. Industrial capacity and
utilization climbed to 20% from 15% since the formation of the Inclusive
Government.
All these economic
and political developments formed the backdrop for this study. What
were people’s perceptions about their national economy and
their place in it? In other words, what macro and micro-economic
attitudes do Zimbabweans have? Has the state of the economy changed
in the previous year and if so, in what direction? Has dollarization
made a difference to people’s lives? Are there any variations
in attitudes across space (i.e. geographically) and over time (i.e.
compared to previous surveys)? What are people’s attitudes
towards the mega political event, that is, towards the GPA and the
coalition government? What are their expectations after a decade
of regression? These and other questions motivated this study.
Download
full document
Visit the Mass
Public Opinion Institute
fact sheet
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|