| |
Back to Index
Statement to COMESA Summit on ESA-EC economic partnership agreements negotiations
Southern and Eastern African Trade, Information and Negotiations Institute
(SEATINI)
June 01, 2009
The Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA) is holding
its Policy Organs meetings and the 13th Summit of Heads of State and Government
in the resort town of Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe from the 28th May to 8th
June 2009 under the theme Consolidating Regional Economic Integration
through Value Addition, Trade and Food Security.
From the 2nd - 4th
June 2009 the Council of Ministers will be meeting to deliberate on a
number of issues affecting the COMESA region, including the current negotiations
with the European Union (officially known as the European Community) on
concluding Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs).
We recall
that:
The Eastern and Southern
Africa Group (ESA) and the European Community (EC) senior officials met
in Brussels on 28 April 2009 under the co-chairmanship of H.E Ambassadors
S Gunessee and N. Wahab on ESA side as well as P. Thompson, Director,
DG Trade on EC side. In their conclusions on the Interim EPAs initialled
towards the end of 2007, the officials noted that:
On signature of interim
EPA, EC confirmed that provided that an agreement is reached on translation,
the interim Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) could be ready for signature
around mid-May 2009. ESA confirmed its decision to host the signature
in Mauritius and informed that the issue of the date of signature will
be considered at the next ESA Council scheduled for the 4th June 2009
in Victoria Falls back to back with COMESA Summit with a view to agreeing
on a mutually convenient date as well as its arrangement for the signing
ceremony.
We are concerned
that:
- The ESA countries
(as represented by their officials) have confirmed their decision to
host the signature of the interim EPAs and that they are already considering
discussing the dates of such a ceremony when the outstanding and contentious
issues in the interim EPAs have not been addressed and resolved.
- The contentious
issues arising from the interim EPAs include, inter alia, involve far
reaching commitments on tariffs reductions the freezing of export taxes
that ESA countries have been using, the requirement that ESA countries
should not increase duties on products from the EU beyond what they
have been applying (standstill clause), liberalising "substantially
all trade", bilateral safeguards (for infant industry protection)-all
these issues are still under negotiations. We take the precautionary
principle and reiterate that nothing is agreed until everything is agreed.
- The EC has insisted
that the first priority should be the signature of the interim EPA.
The EU main interest is in market access which they may achieve in interim
EPAs. This limits the scope of focussing on the real issues of interest
to ESA countries that need attention before the signature. ESA countries
should resist the pressure of rushing to sign the interim EPA when it
is clear they will be mortgaging national and public assets to the EC.
We urge ESA
countries to recognise that:
- Africa remains
a marginal player in world trade (6% in 1980 and 3% in 2008) since the
continent's trade structure still lacks diversity in terms of
production and exports. As such, negotiations to further liberalise
(after Structural Adjustment Programmes) their economies will be a futile
and possible suicidal exercise until certain pre-requisites are met
and instituted within their economies. The emphasis on trade liberalisation
alone as a means to stimulating growth and development is misplaced.
- The pre-requisites
(as informed by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development)
centre on addressing the structural constraints in ESA countries including:
increased public
investment in research and development, rural infrastructure —
including roads — and health and education
overhauling the
basic productive infrastructure to make production more reliable.
Power generation, water supply and telecommunications are three key
areas that need special attention. In addition, building a competitive
manufacturing sector will require the strengthening of the support
infrastructure needed for exporting, including roads, railways and
port facilities.
encouraging cross-border
trade infrastructure. It is unlikely that the manufacturing sector
in Africa will grow to a competitive level if it is limited to small
domestic markets. The smallness of individual African markets and
the difficulty for most firms to access the markets of industrialized
countries suggest that in the short and medium term, the expansion
of intra-African trade could offer the opportunity to widen markets
outside national boundaries. In so doing, some key infrastructure
projects could be executed at the regional level, taking into account
regional economic complementarities.
development of
domestic policy regulatory frameworks to regulate the movement of
goods and services in and outside ESA countries. This includes adopting
policies that ensure Special and Differential Treatment including
the Special Safeguard Mechanism in agriculture, use of tariffs, among
other things
- Trade liberalisation
has so far discouraged intra-regional trade in Africa as the reduction
of tariffs, which reduce the preference margins given to other African
countries, reduce the incentives for intraregional trade.
- The Cotonou Agreement
(that forms the legal basis of negotiating EPAs), recognise that reciprocal
agreements (EPAs) with the EC had to foster regional integration and
to be based on current integration efforts. However, as the interim
agreements have shown, this commitment has been negated as the current
configuration of the EPA encompasses a major risk of undermining ongoing
regional integration processes.
- Most countries
in the region continue to suffer from food shortages and food insecurity.
As a result they have been importing more food and energy (including
inflation which was at 10.7% in 2008 up from 6.4% in 2007, the continental
average excluding Zimbabwe) into the region. Trade liberalisation will
exacerbate the problems of food insecurity.
- The ESA political
leadership have an obligation towards their people and should ensure
that whatever decisions they take should not put the lives of people
in danger. This means all those targets of reducing poverty, reducing
child and maternal mortality and increasing access to education for
the people should be used as tools for making informed decisions especially
with regards to trade negotiations.
- Given the above,
liberalising ESA economies under the EPAs as already indicated by the
interim EPAs will further weaken the countries' ability to develop
and respond to the challenges posed by liberalisation and Limit Africa
to the production and export of low value goods (the so-called "poor-country"
goods) based on the so-called comparative advantage argument. This is
tantamount to condemning the continent and locking it into poverty.
We therefore
recommend that:
- A moratorium be
put in place on EPAs negotiations until the ESA countries have put in
place adequate institutional mechanisms to deal with trade liberalisation
as recommended by the African Union, UNCTAD, the United Nations Economic
Commission for Africa among others.
- ESA countries focus
on developing its regional market, steps that have already been taken
by consolidating the gains of the COMESA FTA, the Customs Union and
the move to form a single FTA with the East African Community (EAC)
and the Southern African Development Community (SADC)
- In light of the
high food and energy prices, the climate crisis and the current global
recession triggered by the financial crisis, ESA countries MUST reverse
most of the commitments they have agreed under the IMF/World Bank SAP
policies, the World Trade Organisation and the so-called interim Economic
Partnership Agreements. This will allow the countries to implement favourable
home grown policies that are in tandem with their development priorities
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|