THE NGO NETWORK ALLIANCE PROJECT - an online community for Zimbabwean activists  
 View archive by sector
 
 
    HOME THE PROJECT DIRECTORYJOINARCHIVESEARCH E:ACTIVISMBLOGSMSFREEDOM FONELINKS CONTACT US

 

 


Back to Index

Zimbabwe faces long painful road to health
William Wallis, Financial Times
September 19, 2008

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0a77c1d6-85a4-11dd-a1ac-0000779fd18c.html?nclick_check=1

Even if all goes well, it could take more than 12 years for Zimbabwe's economy to recover peak levels of per capita income reached in 1991, according to a United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) report seen by the Financial Times.

The report, "Comprehensive Economic Recovery in Zimbabwe", is due to be published on Friday. Researched and written by five Zimbabwean economists, it is the first economic assessment to be published in the wake of this week's power-sharing agreement between the veteran autocrat Robert Mugabe and his opposition rival, Morgan Tsvangirai, now prime minister designate.

Over 239 pages it charts the radical and, in many cases, painful policy measures necessary to revive the country's fortunes following a decade of crisis that has ravaged the economy and eroded the state's institutional capacity to respond.

A minimum of $5bn (€3.5bn, £2.7bn) in foreign aid, including debt relief, will be needed over the next five years - $1.62bn of that in the first year - if the government is to plug financing gaps, revive infrastructure and stave off hunger among the 5m Zimbabweans threatened by starvation. This would make it one of the largest recipients of aid in Africa.

Those figures would be significantly higher if pensioners were reimbursed for savings eviscerated by the collapse of the currency, and thousands of white farmers driven from their land by Mr Mugabe's resettlement programme compensated.

"Without substantial foreign assistance sustainable economic recovery will be impossible," the report says, adding that the manner in which Zimbabwe tackles structural problems at the outset could determine whether it becomes aid-dependent or able, in the long term, to sustain its own development.

The report spares few details in portraying the scale of the task facing any government to emerge from the wrangling over cabinet positions. Farm production has more than halved in a decade, starving the manufacturing sector, once among the most developed on the continent, of raw materials and creating conditions for mass starvation. Tourism has petered out, while the HIV-Aids pandemic has contributed to reducing life expectancy from 57 to 37 years.

At the same time, at least 2m of the 12m population have emigrated to South Africa, the UK, Botswana and other countries, many of them skilled workers and professionals. Eighty per cent of medical personnel trained since 1980 have left the country.

A prerequisite for recovery will be plugging vast budget deficits financed in recent years by money-printing and credit creation. This has driven inflation to a world record of about 40m per cent and created a nation of pauperized trillionaires. The mechanisms used to tackle hyperinflation could make the difference between a short-term bust followed by recovery, and a near-term consumption boom followed by recession.

In a "lost" decade Zimbab­we's economy has contracted 37 per cent, while the rest of sub-Saharan Africa made average gains of 40 per cent. It would take uninterrupted growth of 5 per cent annually until 2020 to recover peak per capita income levels. A more likely average is less than 4 per cent, the report's authors suggest.

The government will need to act decisively at the outset when "opposition to radical reforms is likely to be weakest", the report argues, warning of the dangers of "a constrained decision making fostering consensus style compromises that both delay and undermine reforms".

Britain, the US and the European Union have all reacted cautiously to last week's deal, partly because they believe this is the most likely scenario.

Bilateral donors could step in quickly, one senior western official said, if they are convinced the new government is able to carry out reforms. However, this will be dependent on clear signs that Mr Mugabe, in power since 1980, whom they blame for the crisis, has been sidelined.

Longer-term budgetary support - of the type the UNDP suggests will be vital to stabilise the economy - will be dependent on Zimbabwe's agreeing a programme with the International Monetary Fund.

"We want to help Tsvangirai but he has to drive a wedge in. We are not going to put money into a broadly unreconstructed Mugabe condominium," the official said.

Donors have yet to allocate specific funds for Zimbabwe and recovery plans, seen by the FT, of the Multi-Donor Trust Fund (MDTF) administered by the World Bank, are still at a sketchy draft stage.

Talks to set up a unity government in Zimbabwe got off to an inauspicious start on Thursday when the two main parties declared deadlock over the sharing of cabinet portfolios, writes Tony Hawkins.

It was the first meeting of the main protagonists since Monday, when President Mugabe signed away some powers to Mr Tsvangirai, the leader of the opposition Movement for Democratic Change and the prime minister-designate.

According to state media, Mr Mugabe told his party's central committee the move was "a humiliation. . . Anyhow, here we are, still in a dominant position which will enable us to gather more strength as we
move into the future" - comments that do not bode well for the future of the unity government.

MDC officials are hoping they can sideline Mr Mugabe if they gain control of the finance and home affairs ministries at the least.

Nelson Chamisa, a spokesman for the MDC, said negotiating teams would be charged with seeking common ground at the talks.

Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.

TOP