Back to Index
Risking
lives: The fate of women human rights defenders in Zimbabwe
Research
and Advocacy Unit and Zimbabwe Women Lawyers Association
December
10, 2013
Download this
document
- Acrobat
PDF version (479KB)
If you do not have the free Acrobat reader
on your computer, download it from the Adobe website by clicking
here
Background
The Supreme
Court of Zimbabwe, in 2004, laid out the standard treatment of people
in police custody in the case of a woman human rights defender Nancy
Kachingwe. In that case, the Court spelled out that police holding
cells should be of a reasonable size, with good ventilation, sufficient
lighting, and clean and decent flushing toilets with running water.
The Court also explained that persons detained in holding cells
should be given clean drinking water and wholesome food at appropriate
times. Emphasis was placed on the need to practice good hygiene
in the cells, with the Court instructing that police cells should
be cleaned every day; that inmates should be given clean, decent
and adequate washing facilities including soap and that women should
be given sanitary wear upon request. The Court also stated that
inmates should be provided with a means to rest such as a chair
or bench and that if detained overnight they should be given clean
mattresses and blankets.
In a 2009 report
by the Research and Advocacy Unit (RAU) which looked at the process
of detention and its effects on women activists in Zimbabwe, the
findings were clear that the conditions set out in the Kachingwe
were not being observed. The women who were interviewed in the RAU
research complained that women’s sanitation was not being
addressed. Women were not being provided with sanitary wear in police
cells as well as in remand prison. Some suffered toxic shock from
wearing their pads for long periods. The women also stated that
the cells were dark, poorly lit, and dirty with malfunctioning sewer
systems that could only be flushed from outside leaving the inmates
at the mercy of individuals outside the cell to flush the toilets.
The report also
indicated that the bedding was dirty, lice infested, and soiled
with blood, urine or human excrement. The cells were overcrowded
with a space as small as 3x 5 metres, carrying 30 to 40 people at
a time. Food was not provided in holding cells and in remand it
was of a poor quality. Women activists in police holding cells had
to negotiate with prison officers to allow relatives to bring food.
Those with special dietary requirements, who could not receive any
food from their relatives, had no alternatives while in remand prison.
The women activists did not receive proper health care. Most of
them were detained and denied access to their lawyers while undergoing
interrogation.
Download this
document
- Acrobat
PDF version (479KB)
If you do not have the free Acrobat reader
on your computer, download it from the Adobe website by clicking
here
Visit the Research
and Advocacy Unit fact
sheet
Visit the Zimbabwe
Women Lawyers Association
fact
sheet
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|