THE NGO NETWORK ALLIANCE PROJECT - an online community for Zimbabwean activists  
 View archive by sector
 
 
    HOME THE PROJECT DIRECTORYJOINARCHIVESEARCH E:ACTIVISMBLOGSMSFREEDOM FONELINKS CONTACT US
 

 


Back to Index

This article participates on the following special index pages:

  • Zimbabwe's Elections 2013 - Index of Articles


  • Crisis Report - Issue 218
    Crisis in Zimbabwe Coalition
    September 05, 2013

    Download this document
    - Acrobat PDF version (458KB)
    If you do not have the free Acrobat reader on your computer, download it from the Adobe website by clicking here

    Media must be non-partisan and professional, say media stakeholders

    As Zimbabwe emerges from the political tussle of the July 31 election, public concerns linger that the state media overtly fought in the electoral corner of the Zimbabwe African National Union Patriotic Front (Zanu-PF) in violation of national laws and tax payers’ expectations, which has scaled up the volume on calls for public media reforms.

    Consequently, the public has expressed the need for reportage by the state media to be more inclusive of other parties, or highlight public criticism of the ruling party where it is war-ranted in the future.

    A report of the Media Monitoring Project of Zimbabwe (MMPZ) of July 2013 did not mince its words in asserting that the state media houses, Zimpapers and Zimbabwe Broadcasting Corporation (ZBC) had been biased towards Zanu-PF, while denigrating its opponents such as the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC-T) during the recent elections.

    “The government-controlled state media fulfilled its role as the propaganda arm of Zanu-PF by giving widespread and favourable publicity to the party’s campaign activities at the expense of other parties in violation of domestic and international regulations governing the media’s coverage of elections,” the MMPZ Election Watch Issue No. 20/2013 read.

    During the elections 64% of stories in the State run media were on Zanu-PF, while 29% were on the main opposition MDC-T, the report revealed. Of the 278 stories in which the State-run media reported on Zanu-PF, 91 % were positive with the rest being neutral and by comparison, of the 126 stories on the MDC-T, 89% were negative with the rest being neutral, the report revealed.

    But at the Media Alliance of Zimbabwe (MAZ) Annual Conference of Media Stakeholders held in Harare on September 5, Gabriel Chaibva, who desperately emphasized that he is a non-aligned political analyst, spoke glowingly of the state media arguing:

    “They don’t lie. They just spin and that is acceptable.”

    Rejoice Ngwenya, a political analyst and writer, said he had been airing his opinion on radio for 10 years, but it appeared that the state media would not invite his ilk to be on air because of his perceived allegiance to the opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC).

    “We want an opportunity to express ourselves in the public media because the public media is not owned by Zanu-PF, it is owned by the people of Zimbabwe. So we also want an opportunity to sit down with Mupepereki and Chivaura (ZTV social commentators) and explain to them that the MDC was formed by Zimbabweans for Zimbabweans,” he said.

    Professor Eldred Masunungure, a researcher and Political Science lecturer at the University of Zimbabwe (UZ), however, noted that the state media was taking sides and he roped in the private media as being similarly biased before recommending that the media should shun partisan politics and abide by the ethical dictates of its profession.

    “The tragedy of the media has been its embeddedness in partisan politics,” Masunungure argued.

    Masunungure suggested that the situation of a media viewed with suspicion by the public could be salvaged only through a change of editorial policies.

    “I will assert that the role of the media is critical in a society with one party hegemony. With the opposition on its knees, the media both state and private need to stand up to fill the gap,” he said.

    While the private media has been faced with the equal accusation of political bias, it is a commercial sector unlike the state media which is funded by the taxpayers and for which the new Constitution and international policies require non-partisanship as the norm.

    The Southern African Development Community Observer Mission (SEOM), which released its final report on the July 31 harmonized election on September 3 admitted that there was bias in the State media and recommended that there should be a departure from the malpractice.

    MDC-T Spokesperson and former Constitutional Parliamentary Select Committee (COPAC) co-chairperson Douglas Mwonzora, who spoke at the MAZ Conference pointed to provisions in the new Constitution, which seek to guard against state media bias going into the future.

    “The Constitution goes on to say the state media must be impartial and it must afford fair opportunity to divergent views and dissenting opinions,” Mwonzora said.

    Meanwhile, many commentators at the MAZ conference said these constitutional provisions and statutes that are available could only make a difference if they start being implemented.

    Download full document

    Visit the Crisis in Zimbabwe fact sheet

    Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.

    TOP