|
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
Inclusive government - Index of articles
New Constitution-making process - Index of articles
South Africa's facilitation team in Zimbabwe
Crisis
in Zimbabwe Coalition (SA Regional Office)
November 28, 2012
As Crisis in
Zimbabwe Coalition, we commend the South Africa facilitation team
which is currently meeting political players in Zimbabwe, to get
an appraisal on the constitution
making process among other related issues, and advise on a progressive
way forward. This comes in the midst of undisputed media reports
that indicate that the three Principals (President Mugabe, Prime
Minister Tsvangirai and Deputy Prime Minister Mutambara) agreed
to set up a cabinet committee, made up of three cabinet ministers,
one each from ZANU PF, MDC-T and MDC, to reconcile the divergent
views raised during the second all stakeholders' constitutional
conference held last month.
Our position
is unequivocal: we do not support the setting up of another executive
wing to reconcile the differences from the second all stakeholders'
conference. In essence this cabinet committee will have a drafting
mandate. First, there is already the management committee that was
working closely with COPAC and to create a new creature is simply
unreasonable. The differences are not entirely new and the management
committee and COPAC have been working to reconcile these differences
from day one. Second, we respect the doctrine of the separation
of powers (the trias politica principle) among the branches of government
that is the judiciary, executive and parliament. The executive should
therefore not write how they should govern us. Third, Article 6
of the Global
Political Agreement (GPA) is clear on how the constitution making
process should proceed that is from the second all stakeholders'
conference to parliament and from there to a referendum. Fourth,
Zimbabwe is running out of time to afford the luxury of setting
up committee after committee as the next election looms rather the
watchword should be implementation of what is already agreed.
It is our conviction
that some hard-liner political players are buying time to push Zimbabwe
to hold a general election without a referendum and substantive
reforms so that Zimbabwe can have a flawed transition. A flawed
transition will put to waste all SADC's long-term efforts
to ensure a successful and democratic transition in Zimbabwe. Such
a failure will mirror democratic regression in the region, a situation
of one step forward and two steps back with devastating consequences
for the ordinary suffering people of Zimbabwe.
We call upon
progressive forces in Zimbabwe and across the region to unite and
push for a referendum so that Zimbabweans can finally decide their
own destiny toward a successful and democratic transition and an
end to their misery. We thank South Africa's facilitation team for
a hands on approach to the Zimbabwe crisis.
Visit the Crisis
in Zimbabwe fact
sheet
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|