| |
Back to Index
Myths, reality and the inconvenient truth about Zimbabwe's land
resettlement programme
Dale
Doré, Sokwanele
November 13, 2012
View this document
on the Sokwanele
website
Download
this document
-Word
97 version (51.0KB)
- Acrobat
PDF version (49.2KB)
If you do not have the free Acrobat reader
on your computer, download it from the Adobe website by clicking
here
This paper is
part of the Zimbabwe Land
Series
Executive
Summary
Ian Scoones
and his co-authors caused a splash with the publication last year
of their controversial book Zimbabwe's
Land Reform: Myths and Realities. Accompanying the book were
a series of 8 videos, Voices from the Field, as well as downloadable
summaries, YouTube debates, blogs, and interviews with BBC World
TV. Articles were serialised in The Zimbabwean newspaper and a website
was set up, replete with congratulatory sound-bites from distinguished
professorial colleagues. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary
evidence. This review therefore assesses the evidence behind this
mass of publicity for the study's findings. It begins with a synopsis
of the book as told by its lead author. It then examines some of
the book's main themes. The first is the authors' insistence that
their study is based on solid empirical evidence that is used to
analyse the complexities of resettlement. Second, it reviews the
study's research methods, especially the analysis used to dismiss
the so-called 'investment myth'. Third, it looks into the book's
assumptions, objectives and narrative to explain the gaps in their
story of resettlement. Finally, the conclusion discusses whether
there is any substance to the hype, and it compares two visions
of land policy in Zimbabwe.
The
Scoones' story
Ian Scoones
has told his story to many different audiences, but always in the
same well-practiced and carefully scripted way. In essence, he claims
that the realities on the ground reveal a far more positive picture
of resettlement than the negative images or 'myths' portrayed by
the media. He begins his story by noting that the issues surrounding
resettlement are complex and nuanced. He then disarms his audience
with certain caveats by admitting, with hand on heart, that the
story of resettlement is mixed. Yes, he says, the process was deeply
problematic. Violence, abuse and patronage certainly did occur,
and Masvingo Province's experiences were of course different to
other parts of the country. But these contentious issues are quickly
shelved as he deftly steers the debate towards the study's main
objective, which is to find out how the livelihoods of those who
were resettled had been transformed. 'To be honest,' says Scoones
in all sincerity, 'we were surprised. We had a whole set of unexpected
results.'
Contrary to
the myths that there was no investment in resettlement areas and
that a rural economy had collapsed, their research revealed an important
and as yet untold story of land reform. They found that new patterns
of mixed small-scale farming based on crops and livestock had transformed
the dual agrarian economy. He tells how resettlement has benefitted
a broad set of people: the land hungry from nearby communal areas,
townspeople making a go of farming, and civil servants investing
their skills. One of his main claims was that two-thirds of the
settlers were just ordinary people. Only a few were cronies. In
sum: they found hard working and entrepreneurial new farmers who
made significant investments to create a vibrant and dynamic rural
economy.
But he goes
further. Just as commercial farmers were assisted in the 1950s,
and smallholders supported in the 1980s, newly settled farmers deserve
external support and investment to build on their entrepreneurial
dynamism. Given this opportunity, he claims, new farmers will rise
to the occasion by contributing to local livelihoods, national food
security and broader economic development.
Download
full document
Visit the Sokwanele
fact sheet
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|