|
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
New Constitution-making process - Index of articles
Zimbabwe Briefing - Issue 73
Crisis
in Zimbabwe Coalition
(SA Regional Office)
May 11, 2012
Download
this document
- Acrobat
PDF version (777KB)
If you do not have the free Acrobat reader
on your computer, download it from the Adobe website by clicking
here
High
Court orders South African authorities to investigate crimes against
humanity committed in Zimbabwe - SALC
In a landmark
decision
for local and international justice, the North Gauteng High Court
ruled this morning that the South African authorities must investigate
Zimbabwean officials, who are accused of involvement in torture
and crimes against humanity in Zimbabwe.
"This
judgment will send a shiver down the spines of Zimbabwean officials
who believed that they would never be held to account for their
crimes but now face investigation by the South African authorities,"
said Nicole Fritz, Executive Director of the Southern Africa Litigation
Centre (SALC), which brought the case along with the Zimbabwean
Exiles Forum (ZEF).
In a very strong
ruling, Judge Hans Fabricius said that the National Prosecuting
Authority (NPA) and the South African Police Services (SAPS) had
acted unconstitutionally and unlawfully in not taking forward the
original investigation. His judgment also underlined in the strongest
terms South Africa's obligations under international law.
"This
decision is not just about Zimbabwe, it also sets a much broader
precedent by ruling that South African authorities have a duty to
investigate international crimes wherever they take place,"
said Fritz. "It is a major step forward for international
criminal justice."
In March 2012,
SALC and ZEF argued in the High Court that the decision of the NPA
and SAPS not to investigate Zimbabwean officials linked to acts
of state-sanctioned torture should be set aside. Brought in terms
of South Africa's International Criminal Court Act, which
defines torture as a crime against humanity, the applicants' argued
that the NPA and SAPS had failed to take into account South Africa's
international and domestic law obligations to investigate and prosecute
perpetrators of international crimes regardless of where they are
committed or by whom.
The case highlighted
South Africa's duty to investigate crimes against humanity,
the sufficiency of the evidence presented by SALC to the NPA and
SAPS to trigger an investigation and how irrelevant considerations
- such as political concerns - improperly influenced
the decision. The case also exposed divisions within the NPA after
Anton Ackermann, the head of the Priority Crimes Litigation Unit
that is responsible for the investigation and prosecution of international
crimes, stated in an affidavit that he believed that an investigation
should have been initiated and that he was not satisfied with the
manner in which SALC's request was dealt with.
Download
full document
Visit the Crisis
in Zimbabwe fact
sheet
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|