|
Back to Index
Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai's statement to the press
Prime Minister
Morgan Tsvangirai
February 24, 2012
Introduction
Good morning
members of the press and welcome to the Prime Minister's monthly
press day. I have said before that my office believes that Government
is not a secretive cult movement. We started these briefings last
year and every month, I will be briefing you on the political, economic
and social developments in the country so that citizens are informed
of what we are doing or not doing as an inclusive
government.
I also know that your
fraternity kicked off the year on a sorrowful note. You lost your
dear colleagues Makuwerere Bwititi, Freedom Moyo and Bornwell Chakaodza.
May their departed souls
rest in eternal peace.
The
Inclusive Government
It has also been a sorrowful
experience in government.
Last week the
inclusive government celebrated its third birthday and it continues
to lurch along, albeit with the insincerity, mistrust and the lack
of a common understanding that has pervaded this marriage since
its consummation in February 2009.
The
script has not changed
This government
is a painful sorry of frustrations due to mixed messages from what
is supposed to be the same team, non-implementation of key reforms
necessary for a credible poll, violence, arbitrary arrests, lack
of fiscal space, a liquidity crisis and our shameful failure to
pay our civil servants a decent wage.
We have failed
in many respects as a government mainly because ours is a difficult
coalition where there is no shared vision and no shared values.
What is only commendable is that despite the strange nature of our
coalition, we have managed to stop the bleeding and to give Zimbabweans
every reason to hope again. We have given the economy some respite.
But I am now convinced that despite our modest achievements, it
would be fortuitous for Zimbabweans to expect massive economic growth
and job creation due to the tensions and the discord in this government.
Government
Work Programme
The government has adopted
the Government Work programme as the vehicle through which to deliver
services to the people.
Early this month, my
office hosted the Government Work Programme workshop at which the
Council of Ministers adopted the critical path targets for 2012.
Going forward, we are
hoping that the economy should generate the necessary revenue to
enable us to deliver on our critical path targets for this year.
I have made
it clear to the Ministers that this year, I will be reporting to
Parliament
the performance of Ministers in relation to implementation of the
GWP. This is in line with our vision of making Government accountable
to the people through their elected representatives.
The main challenge in
meeting these targets is the limited fiscal space. We are in a squeeze
and I also understand the challenge of meeting government commitments
with a hard working government work-force whose income is not enough
to cater for basic needs.
We cannot deliver on
our promises as government as long as we have not addressed the
concerns of the civil servants.
I was in Chiadzwa last
week and it is clear that improved trasparency and remittance of
all revenue to Treasury must give us some space to address these
genuine concerns.
We have tried to link
the GWP to the budget so that all our critical path targets are
funded but you will also be aware that the budget itself was crafted
with assumed funding from the proceeds of diamond sales, the remittance
of which has been erratic so far.
The
Chiadzwa visit
Because our
budget is largely dependent on assumed revenue from the sale of
diamonds and having come from a meeting with representatives of
civil servants, I visited
Chiadzwa on Thursday and Friday last week.
I saw massive equipment
tearing apart the belly of the earth. But a simple tour is only
half the story. Even after the visit, I still feel that with more
transparency and plugging of leakages, we can be able to finance
the budget and to respond to critical isues such as the issue of
civil servants' salaries.
I visited both the mining
sites and the displaced villagers at the Arda Transau Estate.
I was especially touched
by the plight of the villagers. There is no direct benefit to the
people whose lives were disrupted and on whose traditional land
this treasure is being mined.
I visited the displaced
families at Arda Transau and I appreciate the decent houses the
mining companies have built for them.
But life is not simply
about a decent house. It is about sustaining your livelihood through
personal enterprise and the resettled families still have genuine
concerns about their land being inadequate for agriculture, among
many other concerns.
Those diamonds will mean
nothing to the country if they fail to transorm people's lives,
starting with the Marange community itself and so far, it appears
diamond proceeds can still do more for this country and for the
Marange people if there is more transparency in the disposal of
this resource.
The hypocricy of government
on indigenisation is more than exposed in Chiadzwa. If we are genuine
about community share-ownership schemes, why have we not accorded
the same shares to the communities in Marange so that these people
benefit from the resources around them? The companies mining there,
including those owned by the government, have not done that which
we are forcing companies to do.
Media
Reforms
The Zimbabwean constitution
promotes freedom of the media and expression, however this is hampered
by interference and the implementation of strict media laws.
In its 2008 report, Reporters
Without Borders ranked the Zimbabwean media in the Press Freedom
Index as number 151 out of 173. In December, the Committee to Protect
Journalists (CPJ) called on the Zimbabwe government to reform the
media sector.
The situation remains
dire, with the responsible Ministry refusing to implement agreed
reforms in this critical sector.
At our Principals'
meeting on Monday, we restated our position and gave the Minister
three weeks to comply with our directive to reconstitute the BAZ
board, the ZBC board and the Mass Media Trust. We expect that to
happen. Cabinet agreed to it, the Principals agreed and we expect
the Minister to implement this position.
Unilateral
actions
The discord in government
has been amplified by the lack of sincerity by President Mugabe
and his party.
The President has gone
to re-appoint the Police Commissioner-General in spite of the Constitutional
provision that the two of us must agree on such appointments.
Secondly, the Police
Services Commission, which must make a recommendation to the President,
is yet to be regularised and it is clear that the so-called re-appointment
was un-Constitutional and against our agreement as Principals at
our meeting of 6 February 2012.
For the record,
I met the two Co-Ministers of Home Affairs and the permanent secretary
on Friday, 10 February 2012 and they made it clear to me that the
Police Services Commission is not regularised and that it is that
body that makes a recommendation to the President. Schedule 8 to
the Constitution
sets out the framework for this current Inclusive Government. It
states the following;
For the avoidance of
doubt, the following provisions of the Interparty Political Agreement,
being Article XX thereof, shall, during the subsistence of the Interparty
Political Agreement, prevail notwithstanding anything to the contrary
in this Constitution-
We should all be guided
by the provisions of Schedule 8 to the Constitution in the execution
of government business during the subsistence of the Inclusive Government.
Schedule 8 to the Constitution
clearly states that the President and I share the executive powers
of governing. In terms of Article 20.1.3 (p), the President makes
all key appointments in consultation with the Prime Minister.
Section 115 [i] of the
Constitution is clear on what the phrase 'in consultation
with' means. It states that in consultation means that the
person required to consult before arriving at a decision, arrives
at the decision after securing the agreement of the person so-consulted.
The appointment of the
Commissioner General of Police is undoubtedly a key appointment.
The consent of the Prime Minister is required before the appointment
of a Commissioner-General.
The three of us agreed
at our meeting on 6 February agreed that once the Police Services
Commission was properly constituted, the process of appointing the
next Commissioner General would commence.
Pursuant to our agreement
that l have referred to, l summoned the Co-Ministers of Home Affairs
and instructed them to commence the process of selecting suitable
candidates for appointment into the Police Service Commission. The
Co-Ministers assured me that they had already commenced the process.
The President's
re-appointment of Augustine Chihuri is therefore contrary to the
unambiguous dictates of the Constitution.
The Police Service Commission
which according to the Police Act, must be consulted in the process
of the appointment of the Commissioner General has not been re-constituted.
In addition, the President
did not consult me as is required by the law. Augustine Chihuri
is therefore, not a legitimate Commissioner General of the Police.
At that same meeting
it was agreed that Mr Chihuri is serving in an acting capacity to
ensure that there is no vacuum created before the appointment of
a substantive Commissioner General. I still insist that we stand
by that agreement so that we do not create unnecessary hiccups in
the Inclusive Government.
So it is clear that not
only is the re-appointment unconstitutional and unprocedural, but
it also betrays lack of sincerity on the part of President Mugabe.
We cannot have a President who takes a position with fellow Principals
and acts outside that position and the Constitution that he swore
to uphold.
I have made it clear
to the President that he is in breach of the Constitution and that
I and the party I lead will not recognise Chihuri's appointment
as legitimate.
He is a party appointee.
This is nothing personal, but it has everything to do with abiding
by the laws of the land.
Let me put it this way.
We have a President who indicates left and turns right.
He has undermined our
collective position and agreement as Principals while he directs
his functionaries to execute directives that are at variance with
our common position. The question is, Can the real Mugabe stand
up?
We have continued to
adopt positions and to make decisions as the leadership of the country,
but thereafter the President goes on to execute his personal and
partisan position which is at variance with our binding agreements
as Principals.
The President has continued
to live in the past, forgetting that this is shared responsibility.
He has continued to talk of his own personal powers, either to appoint
or to call for elections, despite the fact that Amendment 19 is
clear that we share executive authority and that he and I must agree.
I am not in this position
by accident. I won an election and I defeated the President in that
poll. I have a Constitutional responsibility to execute and Zimbabwe
is better served if as leaders we stick, respect and adhere to the
Constitution.
Elections
The date of
the next election remains process-driven. As Principals, we are
now seized with the Constitution-making
process and we have asked the COPAC management committee to
furnish us with a trajectory of how they expect the process to pan
out so that we can begin to have an idea of when we can hold the
next election.
I am very clear on the
process, that apart from the Constitution, we have to institute
the key reforms that we have agreed. These include among others
media reforms, the ZEC secretariat, new voters' roll, non-violence
and other key steps necessary to ensure a free, fair and credible
poll.
We all want an election
provided we implement the necessary reforms which are resident in
Zanu PF Ministries. It is our colleagues who are stalling the election
because once they implement what we agreed, there is no reason why
cannot have an election.
We are aware of the plot
to frustrate us, to wear us down and force us out but we have a
mandate and a covenant with the people.
We will brave on and
ensure that we hold a free and fair poll by creating an environment
that will guarantee the security of the person, the security of
the vote and the security of the people's will.
So only after
the key reforms have been implemented will the President and I agree
on a date for elections. This is the Constitutional position and
this is the position of the GPA,
which is fully guaranteed by SADC and the AU.
I agree with the President
that we have cowards who are afraid of a poll.
Cowards refuse to implement
reforms that will result in a free election.
Cowards beat up people
to coerce them into supporting them.
Cowards are afraid of
facing me in an election. Their best bet is to field a tired candidate
because they believe he is the only one who can stand against Morgan
Tsvangirai.
Way
Forward
The way forward is a
free and fair election but only predicated by a process which includes
a new Constitution and the implementation of those reforms that
will result in a credible poll. Anything else would be a circus.
And in addition, it would be a mockery of what South Africa, SADC
and the AU have been painstakingly working on over the years. It
will be an insult to African institutions by a party which preaches
Pan-Africanism but practices fascism. The lesson of 2008 is that
Zimbabwe cannot afford anything other than a credible poll.
Zanu PF is stalling the
election because most of the reforms reside in their ministries.
If these are implemented tomorrow, we can go to an election any
time. The ball is in their court.
Finally, it is clear
that some provinces such as Masvingo have experienced a drought.
This government has a
responsibility to ensure food security in the country. No one should
starve.
I want to assure the
people that we will do will we can not only to provide food, but
to create a peaceful country and a conducive environment for them
to elect leaders of their choice
I thank You
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|