|
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
Marange, Chiadzwa and other diamond fields and the Kimberley Process - Index of articles
Politics, principles and practice: Zimbabwe's diamonds and the Kimberley
Process
Heinrich
Böll Stiftung
October 14, 2011
Download
this document
- Acrobat
PDF version (860KB)
If you do not have the free Acrobat reader
on your computer, download it from the Adobe website by clicking
here
In 2003 the
Kimberley Process Certification Scheme (KP) was created to prevent
the trade of diamonds by rebel groups to finance violent conflict
against legitimate governments. Notable progress has been made:
the percentage of so-called "conflict diamonds" in the
total diamond trade has fallen from an estimated 4 to 15 percent
at the end of the 1990s to less than 0.2 percent today. Nonetheless,
the scheme has come under severe criticism, due to perceptions of
a widening gap between its principal goals and practical application.
Zimbabwe's
Marange diamonds, in particular, have been tainted by reports
of violence, human rights abuses and smuggling, fuelling doubts
about the scheme's credibility and sparking debate about its
definition of "conflict diamonds". The issue has highlighted
deep divisions among KP member states, and has paralysed the scheme
through lack of consensus.
Recently, the
battle over Zimbabwe's Marange diamonds and the KP entered
a new round. In October 2011 the KP civil society coalition announced
its intention to boycott a KP plenary meeting scheduled for November
in Kinshasa, DRC. Civil society, along with government and industry,
constitutes one of the three pillars of the KP. The civil society
delegation walked out of the last KP intersessional meeting in June
to protest the approval of Zimbabwe's rough exports by current
Chairman Mathieu Yamba without the required consent of all member
states. In his reply to the civil society boycott, Mr. Yamba stated
that the plenary meeting will go ahead, and that he would "continue
to work with those who wish so".
Can
the KP survive Marange?
Alan Martin,
one of the leading activists in the KP civil society coalition,
is convinced that should the scheme fail to modernise and commit
to a higher set of standards, it will ultimately become irrelevant.
In contrast, Stéphane Chardon, chairman of the KP Working
Group on Monitoring, argues that the Marange issue has, to some
extent, demonstrated the scheme's capacity to tackle new challenges,
enabling it to contribute to real improvements on the ground.
The security
and human rights situation has indeed improved since the violent
2008 upsurge, when the Zimbabwean government deployed the military
in the area. However, human rights activist Farai Maguwu cautions
that the Marange diamond fields remain volatile. More importantly,
the issue needs to be understood in the context of Zimbabwe's
political crisis, which remains unchanged. Instead of uplifting
the Zimbabwean economy after years of turmoil, and despite the formation
of a government of national unity, patterns of ownership and opacity
regarding revenue streams suggest that the Marange diamonds serve
as an important income source for the ruling ZANU-PF elite and its
military allies. It is because of this alleged link between ZANU-PF's
brutal grip on power and the control of the Marange diamonds that
some observers argue they should be classified as "conflict
diamonds".
However, whether
this - and consequently, Zimbabwe's suspension from the KP
- would lead to the desired results is subject to controversy. Claude
Kabemba argues that continued trade of the Marange diamonds under
the KP would help ensure at least minimal transparency and accountability.
The contributions
brought together here clearly show that the solution to the Marange
issue ultimately lies within Zimbabwe. There is, however, little
doubt that the KP and Zimbabwe's neighboring states should
play a more critical role in resolving the situation. We hope that
this edition of Perspectives, which was inspired by robust discussions
at a roundtable seminar co-hosted by the foundation, will stimulate
further debate on how to make the Marange diamonds work for the
benefit of all Zimbabweans.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|