Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
Inclusive government - Index of articles
Public
opinion: What people say about the GPA
Jabusile Shumba and Anyway Chingwete, OSISA
June
30, 2011
Download this document
- Acrobat
PDF version (1.79MB)
If you do not have the free Acrobat reader
on your computer, download it from the Adobe website by clicking
here.
http://www.osisa.org/openspace/zimbabwe/public-opinion-what-people-say-about-gpa
In September
2008, the leaders of the Zimbabwe African National Union Patriotic
Front (ZANU-PF) and the two wings of the Movement for Democratic
Change (MDC-Tand MDC-M) 'set aside' their political
differences and signed a landmark power sharing agreement known
as the Global
Political Agreement (GPA). The GPA was the culmination of protracted
negotiations, mediated by South Africa's ex-president Thabo
Mbeki on behalf of the Southern Africa Development Community (SADC),
to find a legitimate and workable way out of the deadlock following
the inconclusive March
presidential poll and the violence-marred
run-off in June. In Article II of the GPA, the Parties agreed 'to
work together to create a genuine, viable, permanent, sustainable
and nationally acceptable solution to the Zimbabwe situation and
implement the agreement with the aims of resolving once and for
all the current political and economic situations and chart a new
political direction for the country'. A key component of the
GPA was the formation of an Inclusive Government (IG), which finally
came into existence in February 2009.
Two years after
the signing of the GPA, the Institute for a Democratic Alternative
for Zimbabwe (IDAZIM) conducted an opinion poll on public attitudes
to the IG.
In this paper,
we discuss the performance of the government based on the survey's
findings and on supporting evidence from secondary sources. We recognise
the limitations of space and time and for that reason, we have restricted
ourselves to the public's opinion of economic, political and
constitutional reform; elections; state institutions; service delivery;
and, transitional justice since they are some of the key imperatives
agreed in the GPA.
Zimbabwe's
transition under the Inclusive Government
With the signing
of the GPA and subsequent inauguration of the IG
a political transition began in Zimbabwe. More than two years into
that transition, Zimbabweans have experienced both progression and
regression on the political and economic fronts. During the first
six months of the IG, the country made incredible progress in terms
of economic reforms and reducing political violence. Hope and considerable
enthusiasm were generated among Zimbabweans but also across the
region and internationally. Opinion surveys conducted soon after
the IG was formed confirmed that there was robust public support
for the coalition government and that Zimbabweans had great expectations
about their future. In a survey conducted by the Mass Public Opinion
Institute (MPOI) between March and early April 2009, a whopping
80 percent of Zimbabweans approved of the formation of the IG, while
only 14 percent disapproved and 5 percent were neutral. In May 2009,
66 percent of Zimbabweans were agreeable to the sentiment that 'creating
a coalition government in Zimbabwe was the best way forward'
against 26 percent who felt that the coalition government was an
ineffective way of resolving the crisis. This majority support for
the IG was an expression of hope for the future for an end to protracted
economic decline, for a return to political stability and for improved
delivery of key social services. Approximately two years into the
life of the coalition government, the IDAZIM survey found that about
70 percent of Zimbabweans still expressed satisfaction with the
performance of the IG, while 25 percent felt the government had
performed badly or very badly. Overall how would you judge the performance
of the Inclusive Government so far?
Overall
how would you judge the performance of the Inclusive Government
so far?
Performance |
Percentage |
Performed
very well |
8 |
Performed
well |
62 |
Performed
very badly |
7 |
Performed
badly |
18 |
Don't know |
5 |
Total |
100 |
Download
full document
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|