THE NGO NETWORK ALLIANCE PROJECT - an online community for Zimbabwean activists  
 View archive by sector
 
 
    HOME THE PROJECT DIRECTORYJOINARCHIVESEARCH E:ACTIVISMBLOGSMSFREEDOM FONELINKS CONTACT US
 

 


Back to Index

Economy and society restructured: New formations of labour and capital - 'Progress' in Zimbabwe Conference
Amanda Atwood, Kubatana.net
November 08, 2010

'Progress' in Zimbabwe Conference index page

View audio file details

Speaker: Godfrey Kanyenze
Discussants: Colin Stoneman, Rob Davies

Key Participants: David Mupamhadzi, Richard Kamidza

Godfrey Kanyenze presented a sobering review of Zimbabwe's economic decline since the 1980s, and the implications this has had on agriculture, industry, incomes and inflation. Kanyenze also discussed the development of economic dualism, in which a developed formal sector operates along side an underdeveloped rural and informal economy.

Colin Stoneman noted that historically, in other countries, successful development has always depended on industrialisation. Zimbabwe had a chance for this in the 1980s, and was trying to following other late comers' successful examples. Progress was on the cards. But, Stoneman observed, the experience since then has been in the opposite direction. The possibilities of building on what was there before have gone. He stated that there is no way of trying to resurrect the partial success story of the 1980's. Not only has Zimbabwe changed, the world has changed. If we're looking for progress for Zimbabwe in the future on the basis of industrialisation, he said, it has to find some alternative mode. The most likely possibility, according to Stoneman, is that Zimbabwe will be integrated into the global world system on the latter's terms. In this context, Zimbabwe is likely to be peripheral and far from autonomous. Progress, Stoneman indicated, would deliver some small improvement in living conditions, but not what it could have been. Listen

Commenting from the floor, Charity Manyeruke asked how are people in Zimbabwe really surviving presently? What are they surviving on? She noted that in the discussion there was an omission of the role that women play in the economy. She speculated that cross-border trading was not very attractive before the crisis, but with an increasing reliance on imports it became big business. Women largely got involved in retail trading, and were supporting their families - and their husbands - through this engagement, whereas men were used to getting employed in formal structures. She observed that there are psychological and sociological problems men face in failing to deal with informalisation of the economy. Listen

Also commenting from the audience, John Makumbe argued that the political economy approach cannot just play on the figures in terms of production, rate of inflation, and so forth. It must also say who are the winners and who are the losers, and where are they in relation to governance. He said that people need to go into who is benefiting from this. Who is losing? It's a staggering figure to say that the rate of unemployment is 90% in Zimbabwe, and the poverty rate is 92%. That is what is more devastating. So that when Ibbo Mandaza says we are doing better than a lot of other countries, he asked, who is we. Listen

Visit the Kubatana.net fact sheet


Audio File

Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.

TOP