THE NGO NETWORK ALLIANCE PROJECT - an online community for Zimbabwean activists  
 View archive by sector
 
 
    HOME THE PROJECT DIRECTORYJOINARCHIVESEARCH E:ACTIVISMBLOGSMSFREEDOM FONELINKS CONTACT US
 

 


Back to Index

Landed Economies: Farming & Farmers Then & Now - 'Progress' in Zimbabwe Conference
Amanda Atwood, Kubatana.net
November 08, 2010

'Progress' in Zimbabwe Conference index page

View audio file details

Speaker: Blessing Karumbidza
Discussants: Jocelyn Alexander, Easther Chigumira

Key Participants: Lionel Cliffe, Wilbert Sadomba, Ben Cousins, Philan Zamchiya, Joe Hanlon

Blessing Karumbidza opened the discussion with a look at land and agriculture from the context of its potential to meet livelihood needs.

He argued that the liberation of 1980 was "substitution by elimination" - the system of production remained the same. There was the potential for greater reform in production with the opening up of access to supporting institutions and the increased production in communal areas, but there was no increase in the land mass on which to produce. Whilst there was rhetorical support for peasant farming in the 1980s, nothing substantive was done to create that.

Karumbidza then asked if the land occupation movement was an example of the structure, the system of production, finally changing. He argued that this period was a result of the 1980s potential for increased peasant production not having been actualised. This, he argued created both the MDC and the land occupation movement. He noted that several factors about the new farmers present reasons for optimism, including the fact that there is a broader spectrum of large, medium and small scale farmers, that people with different means can now access land, and a restructuring of ownership and access.

Responding to Karumbidza's presentation, Easther Chigumira questioned his convictions that farming "then" (as in the 1980s) is really so different from farming "now." She noted there is still multiple farm ownership, still patronage, still bifurcation, but it is by class, not race. Key institutional structures, such as markets, are weaker than they were in the 1980s. Thus, she said, she was not as optimistic about new farmers, particularly given the long term degradation of the environment which has happened in the process. There is gold panning, sand mining, organised by suitcase farmers. Is that really progress? Listen

Lionel Cliff noted that everyone has an opinion about land in Zimbabwe. The farther you get away from the reality the clearer your opinion is. When you have major structural change, the actual outcome bears very little resemblance to the policies proposed. Resettlement in 1980s was translocation, shifting people, with an idea that they wouldn't leave the place they'd been resettled to, and a notion that they would become full time farmers, not proletariat. But neither of those things happened. People who went to resettlement didn't give up their old land and didn't stay away from city jobs.

Ben Cousins observed that evaluating Zimbabwe's agrarian reform is a remarkably difficult thing to do. What Cousins has discovered talking about the findings from the Livelihoods off the Land Reform study is how difficult it is for all of us to accept messy contradictory complicated reality. The idea that it is profoundly contradictory is a very difficult to grasp and accept. Cousins then shared some of the ways in which it is so contradictory and ultimately ambiguous. He stated that recent studies by his team and others has shown real evidence that there are many positives to the last decade - in terms of changed structure of ownership, and a new emerging agrarian structure that goes beyond land ownership and just farming to the entire way the agrarian economy functions. Listen

However, Cousins noted, land reform is not sufficient; it is not enough of a solution to the poverty of the people. Some of the negatives of this redistribution include that the collapse of large scale commercial farming contributed in some way to economic decline. There was a weakening of democratic institutions, and a decline of rule of law. Will the redistribution succeed in the long term? This will depend on the behaviour of the state.

Visit the Kubatana.net fact sheet


Audio File

Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.

TOP