|
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
Inclusive government - Index of articles
Two years on, the GPA proves to be the betrayer of hope
Crisis
in Zimbabwe Coalition
September 15, 2010
On the 15th
of September 2010, the Global
Political Agreement was signed by the three main political parties
in Zimbabwe. Most people hoped that the signing of the agreement
would usher in much needed reforms in the socio-economic and political
arenas. In the words of the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC)
President, Morgan Tsvangirai, the day marked "the return of
hope" borne out of "painful compromises".
However, two
years after the signing of the historic pact, the Crisis in Zimbabwe
Coalition expresses its disappointment at how the hopes of many
Zimbabweans have been shattered and betrayed by the inclusive government.
The dark cloud
of deep despondency synonymous with Zimbabwe in the greater part
of 2008 seems to have made a quiet but ominous return and now hangs
over us, making the path of the country seem uncertain.
While The Coalition
acknowledges the positives witnessed particularly in the economic
sector, as evidenced by the availability of commodities at trading
points and increased stability of the economy, most Zimbabweans
remain poor due to the meagre wages they receive and the inaccessibility
of foreign currency. Scores of Zimbabweans are still battling to
make ends meet on a daily basis with some living below the accepted
minimum standards.
The Crisis in
Zimbabwe Coalition also expresses its disappointment at the continued
failure by the three principals of the GPA to successfully implement
the agreement in full. The former ruling party, ZANU-PF in particular,
has continued on the treacherous path of promoting hate speech,
fanning violence and abusing various state media resources as platforms
for such diatribes.
The 2nd anniversary
of the GPA also falls close to the deadline set by the Southern
African Development Community (SADC) at its Heads of State Summit
in Windhoek, Namibia last August. Whilst it comes as no surprise
that this deadline will expire without the three principals -
including SADC itself - feeling any deep sense of shame and
guilt at yet another betrayal of Zimbabwean hope, we remain adamant
that SADC still has a key role to play in the quest for a more sustainable
solution to the Zimbabwe crisis.
SADC, as guarantor
of the GPA, must be the midwife to help deliver democracy in Zimbabwe.
Without that, there will be another stillbirth for democracy because
the country's institutions remain too weak and compromised
to prevent state-sponsored violence or to deliver a democratic election.
The chaos, violence and intimidation authored predominantly by ZANU-PF
around the on-going constitutional outreach program clearly indicate
that instruments of repression remain active and that they are likely
to be used again in future elections.
Under Article
VII of the GPA, parties to the agreement agreed to 'give consideration
to the setting up of a mechanism to properly advise on what measures
might be necessary and practicable to achieve national healing,
cohesion and unity in respect of victims pre and post independence
political conflicts' resulting in the formation of the Organ
on National Healing. That the Organ on National Healing has not
begun its work is not only inconsistent with Article VII of the
GPA but also provides fertile ground for further proliferation of
politically motivated violence without actually having put in place
mechanisms to avoid such and to deal with cases of the past.
But the prize
for the worst form of betrayal of the majority of Zimbabweans goes
to the Joint Monitoring and Implementation Committee (JOMIC) whose
mandate is, among other functions, "to ensure the implementation
in the letter and spirit of [the GPA]". That there have been
repeated failures in the full implementation of the GPA is a result
of this committee's lack of sincerity, goodwill and genuine
desire to see the peaceful resolution of the crisis in Zimbabwe.
Yet, Zimbabweans
cannot continue to be held at ransom forever. With an election looking
the most plausible avenue of resolving the political crisis, the
Crisis in Zimbabwe Coalition, therefore, reiterates calls for technical
support to be provided for the newly appointed Zimbabwe Electoral
Commission by more experienced regional electoral bodies such as
the South African Electoral Commission.
Also -
and as hinted above - SADC must supervise Zimbabwe elections
to ensure full compliance with SADC Principles and Guidelines Governing
Democratic Elections - including impartiality of electoral
institutions, prevention of state-sponsored violence and non-interference
in electoral processes by the state security sector. In addition
to this, SADC must immediately deploy monitors in Zimbabwe to closely
assess the ongoing constitution-making process and to investigate
reports of widespread violence, intimidation and the setting up
of militia bases across the country.
Lastly -
and in order to avoid a repeat of negotiating electoral outcomes
- the Crisis in Zimbabwe Coalition calls for guarantees that
there will be a peaceful and democratic transfer of power to the
eventual winner of the proposed elections. In tandem with this,
SADC must also use political and diplomatic pressure to ensure that
that the Inclusive government prioritises security sector-reform
in Zimbabwe to ensure that security forces are non-partisan in the
execution of their duties.
The Coalition
on the 2nd anniversary of the GPA, therefore, challenges this prevailing
rainbow-like illusion that graceful beauty has been successfully
restored to Zimbabwe and the beasts of poverty, corruption, violence
and hate have been exiled.
Visit the Crisis
in Zimbabwe fact
sheet
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|