THE NGO NETWORK ALLIANCE PROJECT - an online community for Zimbabwean activists  
 View archive by sector
 
 
    HOME THE PROJECT DIRECTORYJOINARCHIVESEARCH E:ACTIVISMBLOGSMSFREEDOM FONELINKS CONTACT US
 

 


Back to Index

Drop dead beautiful? Legal notes on death and the President
Derek Matyszak, Research and Advocacy Unit Zimbabwe
September 06, 2010

Download this document
- Acrobat PDF version (149KB)
If you do not have the free Acrobat reader on your computer, download it from the Adobe website by clicking here.

ZANU PF supporters have on several occasions expressed the wish that President Robert Mugabe die in office. With speculation about Mugabe's ill health rife and more plausible than usual, it is interesting to consider the legal position and what ought to happen in terms of the current constitution if Mugabe were to die today.

Section 29(3)(b) of the Constitution provides that if the President becomes incapable of performing the functions of his office by reason of mental or physical incapacity he will cease to hold office if a joint committee of the Senate and House of Assembly formed at the request of one third-of the members of the House of Assembly so recommends and the recommendation is supported by two-thirds of a joint sitting of both Houses. If, however, Mugabe dies suddenly, so that the question of the degree of his debilitation is not an issue, Section 31 of the Constitution provides that the duties and functions of the President shall be assumed temporarily by a Vice-President. Where there are two Vice-Presidents, responsibility is assumed either by the Vice-President designated by the President for such eventuality or, in the absence of such designation, the last Vice-President who acted as President in the President's absence.

These provisions were supplemented in 2007 by Section 2 of Constitutional Amendment No 18, drafted specifically with the possibility of Mugabe's sudden death or retirement in mind. Section 28(3)(b) of the current constitution now provides that if the Office of the President becomes vacant by reason of death, resignation or removal from office, the two Houses of Parliament will come together as an electoral college to elect a new President. The new President will remain in office until the next election. If these provisions are implemented, given the intense jockeying that is likely to take place to fill this immensely powerful post, the procedure to be followed is of some interest.

The election of the President through the Parliamentary Electoral College must take place within ninety days of his death or resignation. The procedure to be followed is set out in the Fifth Schedule to the Electoral Act [Chapter 2:13]. The Clerk of Parliament plays an extremely important role in this regard. He sets the date of the election on not less than fourteen days' notice and simultaneously invites nominations for the post from members of Parliament. Candidates must have at least twenty-five nominators and must signify their acceptance of the nomination in writing. The Clerk of Parliament, whose decision is subject to review by the Supreme Court, may reject any nomination which does not comply with the Act. Where there is more than one candidate a vote then takes place, with the House of Assembly as the preferred venue, and presided over by the Chief Justice. Half the members of the Electoral College constitute a quorum, but, if there is no such quorum, the matter is simply adjourned for an hour and those present thereafter constitute a quorum.

Voting is not secret. The Chief Justice directs persons to gather in blocs in parts of the House allocated to each candidate and for whom they wish to vote. One member of the bloc is appointed to compile a register of number of persons and their names in his or her candidate's bloc. The tally of supporters in each bloc is then given to the Chief Justice, who announces the figures. If no candidate receives an absolute majority of votes, the candidate with the least number of votes is eliminated and the process repeated until such a majority is achieved. If there are only two candidates, who receive an equality of votes, the process is repeated over and over, with such adjournments not exceeding 48 hours as the Chief Justice may determine, until one candidate has attained majority; the Chief Justice announces that candidate as duly elected as President. Lists of those comprising the voting blocs, indicating who voted for whom is entered into the Journals of both Houses.

However, since the enactment of Constitutional Amendment No. 19 (which incorporated, almost verbatim, Article 20 of the appallingly drafted Interparty Political Agreement, now commonly known as the GPA), little is clear and free from ambiguity in relation to the composition of Zimbabwe's government.

One of the most glaring anomalies is that Zimbabwe's Constitution is unique in that it does not merely provide that Zimbabwe is to have a president, but it is a constitutional requirement that the President is a specific individual, Robert Gabriel Mugabe. On the death of Mugabe there can be no compliance with this provision. It is unusual that constitutional provisions are drafted in such a way that their implementation may be avoided on account of vis major (an act of God). However, from this provision it may be inferred that the legislature did not contemplate that the post of presidency would be occupied by any other person during the subsistence of the Interparty Political Agreement (IPA), and thus that no provision was made for the contingency of Mugabe's death. It is then arguable that Article 20.1.10 of Schedule 8 to the Constitution was not intended to apply to the presidency.

Download full document

Visit the Research and Advocacy Unit fact sheet

Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.

TOP