Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
New Constitution-making process - Index of articles
Fighting
for a new constitution: Human rights violations experienced by female
members of the NCA
National Constitutional Assembly (NCA)
(Report prepared by RAU)
December
31, 2009
Download
this document
- Acrobat
PDF version (287KB)
If you do not have the free Acrobat reader
on your computer, download it from the Adobe website by clicking
here.
Introduction
Politically
motivated violence against women is one of the more regrettable
features of contemporary Zimbabwean political life. It is a feature
seen in every election since 2000, and is the likely and common
experience of any woman who dares to become politically or socially
active. It can happen to women merely because they are perceived
to be an opponent of ZANU PF, as was so clearly seen in the Presidential
run-off in 2008. As was shown in a recent analysis of the violence
in 2008, a woman who was an MDC member, or merely perceived to be
a supporter of the MDC, was 10 times more likely to report a human
rights violation than a female member of ZANU PF. More worrying
was the finding that female supporters of ZANU PF were 40 times
more likely to have been reported as a perpetrator. It is abundantly
evident that the women of Zimbabwe are deeply involved in the political
crisis.
There are a
number of reports detailing the violations recently experienced
by women in Zimbabwe over the past decade. In 2006, the Zimbabwe
Human Rights NGO Forum [the Human Rights Forum] reported on
these, basing its findings on both the cases reported to the Human
Rights Forum and its members as well as those cases in which the
victims were assisted by the Forum in taking civil action against
their perpetrators.
The report described
448 cases of violations against women, but this was a sub-sample
of 967 cases in total. For the period 2000 to 2006, the most common
violation reported by women was assault, followed by political intimidation
and property destruction, but there were a number of interesting
differences found between urban and rural women. It is important
to note that during this period Zimbabwe had 3 national elections,
i.e. 2000, 2002 and 2005 and it is known fact that violence increases
during election years. Rural women were reported to have experienced
property destruction, displacement, rape, and torture more frequently
than their urban counterparts, whilst urban women reported assault,
unlawful detention, and death threats more frequently. A similar
pattern was found in 2008.
The alleged
perpetrators during this period were said to be most frequently
members of ZANU PF, with the sample alleging ZANU PF supporters
in 80% of cases. If ZANU PF youth were added to this total, the
members of ZANU PF were allegedly responsible in 86% of all these
cases. The Zimbabwe Republic Police [ZRP] were the next most frequent
category of alleged perpetrators [11%], followed by "war veterans"
[8%].
Another study
carried out on Zimbabwean women victims in the refugee population
in South Africa came up with rather more worrying findings. Assault
(severe beatings) was the most common form of physical abuse among
the sample, but other forms of abuse that are commonly reported
in studies of torture - sensory overstimulation, burnings, falanga,
and electrical shock were also reported. However, forms of psychological
abuse were the most common violations, and it should be remembered
that these forms of abuse would conform to torture under the United
Nations Convention Against Torture [UNCAT]. As was the case with
the Human Rights Forum report, ZANU PF supporters [53%] and ZANU
PF Youth [26%] were the commonly mentioned perpetrators. However,
militia [10%], police [18%], and "war veterans" [16%]
were also mentioned with high frequency.
The findings
in another Human Rights Forum report derived from the legal cases
being litigated by the lawyers in the Public Interest Unit [PIU]
of the Forum are important because the success rate in the courts
has been remarkably high. The plaintiffs received favourable judgments
or acceptance of liability in over 90% of cases. This provides strong
evidence that state agents were violating human rights.
Reporting upon
68 women out of 298 cases in all, the Human Rights Forum found that
aggravated assault [57%], assault [37%], and torture [21%] were
the most frequent violations. The most common alleged perpetrators
were the Zimbabwe National Army, reported in 68% of the cases. However,
this was probably due to the high percentage of cases from the food
riots in 1997, and does not constitute a pattern seen subsequently.
However, related to the NCA cases to be described below, it is the
reports on the violations experienced by the members of Women
of Zimbabwe Arise [WOZA] that are most relevant.
In a series
of reports, WOZA demonstrated the perils of both being an activist
and female, showing both the kinds of abuse and the consequences
of this abuse. Of a sample of 1983 WOZA members, 42% reported assault,
33% reported physical torture, 64% reported humiliating and degrading
treatment, and 78% reported political threats. These violations
were all experienced in the course of peaceful protest. Many violations
occurred during the course of protests, but it was also the case
that equally many took place in police custody.
As regards the
alleged perpetrators, the WOZA members, because of their activism,
reported that the Zimbabwe Republic Police [ZRP] were overwhelmingly
the most frequent perpetrators, with the Uniformed Branch [43%]
most frequent amongst the various branches of the ZRP. War veterans
[19%], youth militia [10%], and traditional leaders [10%] were also
mentioned with some frequency. Thus, the pattern of violations is
somewhat different between women that are self-proclaimed activists
and women that merely support a political party - the MDC - or that
their members of their families support, or are merely assumed to
be supporters due to their non-obvious support of ZANU PF.
The categories
of alleged perpetrators are also different, and activists, such
as members of WOZA, report much higher frequencies of violations
at the hands of state agents, whilst the other groups (described
immediately above) are much more likely to report violations at
the hands of members of the ZANU PF political party.
Download
full document
Visit the NCA
fact sheet
Report prepared
by the Research
and Advocacy Unit
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|