|
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
Talks, dialogue, negotiations and GNU - Post June 2008 "elections" - Index of articles
Power
shifts as Zimbabwe deal signed
Robyn
Dixon, Los Angeles Times
September 16, 2008
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-zimbabwe16-2008sep16,0,639428.story
The signing
of a painful compromise Monday by bitter enemies marked a clear
power shift in Zimbabwe. President Robert Mugabe lost control of
parliament and the Cabinet for the first time since independence
from Britain in 1980. But it still won't be easy for his opponents
to govern.
Prime Minister-designate
Morgan Tsvangirai, leader of the Movement for Democratic Change,
faces resistance from hostile government ministers and security
chiefs, as well as hard-line elements of Mugabe's ZANU-PF party.
For the deal
to have any chance, Tsvangirai needs international help to end hyperinflation,
now officially estimated at 11.2 million percent, and rebuild the
country. International reaction to the deal has been cautiously
optimistic, even though Mugabe remains president, keeps control
over the military, and the two sides haven't been able to agree
on who gets which Cabinet posts or controls the police and the intelligence
services.
The enmity between Mugabe
and Tsvangirai is so bitter that many observers question how a joint
Cabinet could work. Tsvangirai has been severely beaten, jailed
and charged with treason. Mugabe has often lampooned Tsvangirai's
intelligence, called him a puppet of the West and sworn that he
would never allow him to rule.
Calling for an end to
bitterness and division, Tsvangirai declared Monday: "I have
signed this agreement because my belief in Zimbabwe and its people
runs deeper than the scars that I bear from this struggle."
Economic paralysis was
the main reason Mugabe was forced to the negotiating table. Independent
economists believe that even the eye-popping official annual inflation
figure is much too low.
The power-sharing deal
ended a prolonged deadlock after March elections, whose official
results gave Tsvangirai 48% and Mugabe 43%. Tsvangirai pulled out
of a June runoff because of violence against his supporters. Although
the ruling party claimed Mugabe won by a landslide, the result was
condemned as undemocratic by African observers and the international
community.
With ZANU-PF hard-liners
ascendant in the party, one senior party official predicted there
would be repeated deadlocks in parliamentary and Cabinet meetings.
"Mugabe is going
to remain in power," he said, because the president will be
chairman of the Cabinet.
ZANU-PF will frustrate
Tsvangirai at every turn, refusing to endorse new legislation, he
predicted. The international community will not back the deal. Food,
transportation and economic hardships will continue, and voters
will turn against the newcomers to power.
"People will say,
'You people were lying. Where are your promises now?' That's what's
going to cause a commotion," he said.
David Coltart, a prominent
lawmaker with a smaller MDC faction, acknowledged that ruling party
hard-liners could frustrate the new government. "In many ways,
Morgan has been given potentially a poisoned chalice," he said.
The tension between the
rivals was obvious at Monday's signing ceremony. Although Tsvangirai
addressed Mugabe as "president," Mugabe pointedly refused
to call Tsvangirai prime minister. Mugabe was loudly jeered by MDC
supporters as he arrived at the ceremony and booed inside the hall
as he spoke.
Under the deal, ZANU-PF
gets 15 Cabinet posts; the MDC, 13; and the smaller MDC grouping
led by Arthur Mutambara, three.
Tsvangirai will control
a council of ministers, in effect a duplicate Cabinet, including
deputy prime ministers -- which will advise on policy and monitor
the Cabinet.
There is still serious
conflict over the division of portfolios, with the MDC determined
to wrest control of the security forces and finance from ZANU-PF.
One MDC insider said
failure to get control of the police would be a "deal breaker"
for Tsvangirai's group.
Another opposition figure,
who spoke on condition of anonymity, said Tsvangirai could wield
power effectively, provided Cabinet jobs were allocated fairly.
"I think our share
of the Cabinet, if it's done on a fair basis, when combined with
our percentage of parliament and our control over the majority of
city councils in the country, would represent a significant shift
of power, especially when you take into account that we enjoy the
support of the significant majority of Zimbabweans," he said.
Mugabe said he would
support the agreement so long as there was no Western interference.
In his speech Monday, he accused the West and colonial powers of
pushing for regime change and seeking control of Zimbabwe's resources.
"Why, why, why the
hand of the British?" he said. "Why, why, why the hand
of the Americans here?"
The agreement called
for Western donor support to rebuild Zimbabwe and called on Britain
to compensate white farmers for farms seized under Mugabe's land
reform, which triggered the collapse of farm production and tilted
the economy into chaos.
The deal calls for an
audit of farms to prevent the ownership of multiple properties and
ensure that farms are productive.
Tsvangirai said the first
government priority would be to open up the country to humanitarian
food aid. He pledged to stabilize the economy, get teachers back
in schools, put doctors and nurses back in hospitals, and ensure
power and clean water.
robyn.dixon@latimes.com
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|