|
Back to Index
In
the shadow of empire
Noah
Tucker, 21st Century Socialism
August 03, 2008
http://21stcenturysocialism.com/article/in_the_shadow_of_empire_01694.html
Download
this document
- Word
97 version (524KB)
- Acrobat
PDF version (434KB)
If you do not have the free Acrobat reader
on your computer, download it from the Adobe website by clicking
here.
The dominant account of the debacle in Zimbabwe is one which dismisses
both history and the international context as irrelevant. The focus
of blame and outrage is on events within Zimbabwe, and specifically
on the actions of its president, Robert Mugabe, since the late 1990s.
Yet for the last 120 years, Britain has cast its shadow over Zimbabwe.
The British point of
view was set out succinctly by the UK's former Foreign Secretary,
Lord Peter Carrington:
For 15 years [following
independence in 1980] Zimbabwe didn't do too badly [...] It was
all right and then things went wrong so Mr. Mugabe played the race
card, and then that didn't work because all the [land] redistribution
went to all the friends and the people who didn't do anything about
it. And then subsequently he's become more and more authoritarian
and you've seen Zimbabwe, the strongest economy in Africa, go down
the drain. And it's a disgraceful state of affairs.
Lord Carrington's comment
was made in a BBC 'Breakfast with Frost' programme in 2005. The
other participant in the interview was Zimbabwe's Ambassador to
the UK, Simbarashe Mumbengegwi, who intervened:
Well let us not forget,
you know, Lord Carrington referred to the race card. The question
of race has never been very far in Zimbabwean politics. We all know
that during the 90 years of colonial rule the land was forcibly
taken from the black majority.
The black majority was
brutalized, we never heard of any human rights [...] And indeed
the question of land being owned by white people in Zimbabwe was
not introduced by President Mugabe. It was introduced by the British
colonial administration. Therefore, any land reform programme in
Zimbabwe had to acquire land from white people, that's how the race
sector comes in, in order to distribute to the black majority.
The noble lord responded
by dismissing the colonial past, as if it had no effect on shaping
the present:
This is absolutely irrelevant
to what is happening in Zimbabwe at the present time. The white
farmers and all the rest of it, that's all history. What has happened
since, there's been an authoritarian government, oppressing the
people of Zimbabwe, you've seen what's happened to the currency,
you've seen what's happened to the food, they're starving.
Land,
lies and bullets
The
territory which was then known as Matabeleland and Mashonaland was
acquired by the British Empire through a combination of state-sponsored
entrepreneurial activity, deception, the exploitation of hostilities
between indigenous leaders and groups, and superior military technology.
Following the discovery of gold deposits in the area, the wealthy
adventurer and politician Cecil Rhodes, based in the British Cape
Colony in what is now part of South Africa, sent envoys to persuade
Lobengula, the Ndebele king, to accede to a mineral concession.
In 1888, Lobengula eventually signed what became known as the Rudd
Concession, in exchange for 1,000 rifles, ammunition, a river patrol
boat, and a monthly payment of £100, having been assured that
only ten white miners would arrive.
On the basis of this
contract, the British Government awarded Rhodes' company, the British
South Africa Company (BSAC), with a Royal Charter; this gave the
company the authority and military backing of the Crown to administer
the region on behalf of the Empire, enshrining Britain's exclusive
of possession of Matabeleland and Mashonaland to the exclusion of
the other European colonial powers which were also scrambling for
Southern African territory- the Portuguese, the Germans and the
Dutch Boers.
The following year, 300
colonial policemen and 200 settler 'pioneers' established a British
military base in Mashonaland; they named it Fort Salisbury after
the British Prime Minister at the time, Lord Salisbury- this base
would become the capital city of the colony. Enticed by the promise
that they would each receive gold mining claims and 3,000 acres
(1200 hectares) of land, hundreds of European settlers began to
arrive.
Realizing that he had
been tricked, King Lobengula repudiated the Rudd Concession, and
attempted to appeal directly to Queen Victoria. He was rebuffed.
Then, when approached by Edouard Lippert, who was believed to be
a representative of Boer and German interests, Lobengula signed
another contract, which included the leasing of tracts of land;
hoping thus to play the colonialists off against each other. But
Lippert sold this contract to the BSAC, and the company then used
the clauses of the Lippert Concession as legal cover for carving
up Ndebele land and apportioning it to the British settlers.
This double deception
was followed by a military campaign. After a punitive Ndebele raid
against some Mashona villages near Fort Victoria, the British, declaring
that they were acting to protect the Shona people, made war on King
Lobengula's forces, devastating the Ndebele warriors with the awesome
firepower of the newly-invented Maxim gun. In the process, the British
military forces and the BSAC seized loot including 200,000 head
of cattle. Demoralised and defeated, Lobengula died in 1894.
Subsequently, as a Zimbabwe
government background paper records:
...the acquisition of
black land had begun in earnest both for crop and livestock production
as well as for speculative purposes. Henceforth the dispersal of
the African populace into mostly marginal lands would be embarked
upon with a ruthless determination following the creation of the
Gwaai and Shangani Reserves in Matabeleland in 1894.
Historical records of
the period leading to the 1896-97 First Chimurenga/Imfazwe, depict
a story of a systematic violation of the rights and dignity of the
indigenous people under white domination. Confirming the official
sanctioning of this policy, the Rhodesia Herald of 19th April 1895
reported thus:
"For the Rhodesian
it was absurd to take the untutored savage, accustomed as he is
from time immemorial to superstitious and primitive ideas of law
and justice, and suddenly try to govern him by the same code of
laws that govern a people with many centuries of experience and
enlightenment."
The 1896-97 [war] was
therefore fundamentally a struggle for the recovery of lost land
and dignity.
Known in Zimbabwe as
the First Chimurenga or First War of Independence, the insurrection
of 1896-97 involved both the Ndebele and the Shona peoples; it was
planned by Mlimo, who was the spiritual leader of the Ndebeles.
In the belief that the indegenous people had been subdued, the British
South Africa Company sent most of its military contingent in Matabeleland
off to a mission of white-on-white violence, the ill-fated 'Jameson
raid' against the Boer settlers in the Transvaal, who were allied
to Britain's imperial rival Germany.
Seizing the moment, the
indigenous forces launched the revolt; combining siege warfare and
guerilla tactics, the Shonas and Ndebeles killed hundreds of white
settlers. Realising the importance of Mlimo as a gifted tactician
and inspirational figure, the British sent two officers behind enemy
lines to assassinate him. Surprising him in his cave while he was
performing a ritual dance, alone and unarmed, the officers shot
him just below the heart. The assassins later described Mlimo as
"60 years-old, with very dark skin, sharp-featured, and a cruel,
crafty look".
Download
full document
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|