| |
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
Talks, dialogue, negotiations and GNU - Post June 2008 "elections" - Index of articles
Fears
grow that sanctions could de-rail mediation
Omid
Memarian and Katie Vandever, IPS News
July 08, 2008
http://ipsnews.net/africa/nota.asp?idnews=43121
U.S. and European efforts
to achieve unanimity among the 15-member U.N. Security Council to
adopt a sanctions resolution against Zimbabwean President Robert
Mugabe and his top aides has run into opposition from African leaders
who argue that it will only increase tensions there and in neighboring
countries. "There isn't any unanimity in the Council on this,"
conceded British Ambassador, John Sawers, after the Security Council
met on Zimbabwe Tuesday. "My delegation supports that resolution
and likes to see it adopted as soon as possible." "The
statement issued by the G8 today clearly sets out that they deplored
the violence they have seen and support the mediation that is on
the way and needs to be reinforced by a U.N. envoy," he added,
referring to the Group of Eight most industrialised nations, which
are meeting this week in Japan.
The Security Council
is expected to vote on the U.S.-backed draft resolution some time
this week. French Ambassador Jean-Maurice Ripert told reporters
Tuesday that proponents of the resolution had secured nine votes,
although Russia, which holds veto power on the Council, is not one
of them, and its ambassador has expressed reservations about the
draft.
Zimbabwe's opposition
Movement for Democratic Change party won more votes than Mugabe's
ZANU-PF in March presidential polls but failed to receive an outright
majority. Its leader, Morgan Tsvangirai, pulled
out of a planned run-off just days before it was held, citing
widespread violence against supporters. Mugabe claims to have won
85 percent of the votes cast in the final Jun. 27 polls. South African
Ambassador Dumisani Kumalo said the Security Council should support
ongoing efforts at mediation towards a political solution. "The
African Union has said categorically that we do not need sanctions
against Zimbabwe. In fact, several heads of state, including the
chair of the African Union, who were in Tokyo, conveyed that message
to the leaders of the G8," he said. "We say don't take
measures that are going to complicate the situation and literally
blow the country apart."
Kumalo said that there
are several problems with the proposed sanctions, which include
an arms embargo and a freeze on the personal assets of Mugabe and
11 other top government officials. "One is that this resolution
claims that the situation in Zimbabwe is a threat to international
peace and security, but the African Union doesn't believe that,
the heads of states that were in Tokyo do not believe that, and
neighboring countries do not believe that," he said. "Second,
this resolution is under Chapter Seven [of the U.N. Charter]...
It says that they want to certify the vote of the first round [won
by Tsvangirai]," said Kumalo. "If the Security Council
is now going to go to countries and start certifying a part of election,
where we are going to stop?"
Kumalo also
criticised the European countries' approach toward the Zimbabwe
crisis as not even-handed. "The European Union, through its
president, said openly that they want to see the leader of opposition
as president of Zimbabwe. Now once you do that you create problems
because we want the people of Zimbabwe to select the president through
free and fair elections without violence and intimidation.
South Africa has been asked to facilitate the mediation by the regional
group together with Angola, and we both report to the African Union,
which reports to the U.N.," said Kumalo. "The Europeans
are implying that we need a new mediator who is going to come in
and impose the candidate on the people. It just creates problems.
We are neighbours and we know what we are dealing with."
However, U.S. Ambassador,
Zalmay Khalilzad, said the aim of the sanctions is to put pressure
on those "who hold the cards... those who need to change their
attitude in order for progress to be made, and those are the 12
individuals that are focused on in tailored sanctions." Khalilzad
said that he expects a vote on the resolution this week. "We
support mediation, but mediation has not been effective as it has
been conducted so far. It has been going on for a long time and
therefore in order to make the mediation more effective we are adding
some elements to the equation that there should be more of a U.N.
role in support, and that's why we say that the secretary-general
should appoint someone."
Deputy Secretary-General,
Asha-Rose Migiro, conveyed the secretary-general's message that
the crisis in Zimbabwe represents a "moment of truth"
for democracy in the continent. "The Zimbabwe issue poses a
challenge to the world. When an election is conducted in an atmosphere
of fear and violence, its outcome cannot have a legitimacy that
is not built on the will of the people," Migiro said following
the Security Council meeting. She added that the question of whether
or not to impose sanctions is up to the U.N.'s member states. "Regarding
suggestions that the U.N. may get more involved with a high-level
envoy to facilitate the mediation process," said Migiro, "this
suggestion has been discussed and the secretary-general will be
open to all suggestions that will lead to a solution of the crisis."
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|