THE NGO NETWORK ALLIANCE PROJECT - an online community for Zimbabwean activists  
 View archive by sector
 
 
    HOME THE PROJECT DIRECTORYJOINARCHIVESEARCH E:ACTIVISMBLOGSMSFREEDOM FONELINKS CONTACT US
 

 


Back to Index

As Mugabe goes back on the defensive, Mbeki faces a crisis of credibility
Peter Fabricius, The Cape Times (SA)
January 21, 2008

http://www.zwnews.com/issuefull.cfm?ArticleID=18113

Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe appeared until recently to be negotiating in reasonably good faith with the opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) for a new political dispensation. He made some important concessions, including the scrapping of the 30 appointed Members of Parliament and reforms to the Public Order and Security Act (Posa) and the Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act (AIPPA), which had given the government undemocratic powers to control political activity and the media respectively. Then he dug in his heels on other demands from the MDC that are more crucial still - including a new constitution, to be implemented before this year's elections, and a postponement of those elections beyond March to allow all the reforms to take effect.

President Thabo Mbeki, who had been mandated by the Southern African Development Community (SADC) last March to mediate the political negotiations, had largely left the job to his aides. But on Thursday he took personal charge and flew to Harare to meet Mugabe and the MDC leaders to try to break the deadlock. Mbeki emerged from a five-hour meeting with Mugabe and told reporters; "It's work in progress and very good progress." But Mbeki was apparently obfuscating, referring to past progress rather than the outstanding issues he had come to Harare to try to resolve. Because he then apparently went to meet the MDC leaders and told them Mugabe had agreed to none of their demands on the outstanding issues. It appears Mbeki himself is sympathetic to the MDC demands. That would make sense.

When he returned last March from the SADC meeting in Dar es Salaam where he was given his mediation mission, Mbeki made it clear that his mandate was to help the Zimbabweans agree on "what should be done between now and those elections to create a climate that will be truly free and fair, for an outcome that will not be contested by anybody ." This was in an interview with Britain's Financial Times, which his office later referred to as the "official position on Zimbabwe". For Zimbabwe to be able to hold an election that meets Mbeki's test of universal acceptability, a new constitution is necessary. It would include a proper bill of rights and an independent media commission; would take the vital voter registration process out of the hands of officials answerable only to Mugabe and generally diminish the extraordinary executive powers he has given himself, which would allow him to control and possibly manipulate the elections. Postponing the election is also critical so that all the necessary reforms can take effect. The MDC has been asking for the elections to take place in June. It will take much longer than that even to restore politics to something like normality. But those extra three months would at least make a difference. Mugabe's refusal to budge presents the MDC once again with the dilemma; whether to contest elections on an uneven pitch or boycott them. This weekend, the two MDC factions were meeting to consider their options. They were also trying to reach an electoral pact to ensure they do not stand against each other and thereby hand the election to Mugabe on a platter, if they do decide to contest. And, if Mbeki has indeed accepted that Mugabe is the cause of the breakdown, what will he do?

In the same Financial Times interview, he said that if he judged that "this particular player in Zimbabwe is obstructing the possibility of finding a political settlement . we will go back to SADC to say we are not moving because these ones are obstructing process". "And, of course, the region must then take a decision what to do ." Will he do that? After being played by Mugabe for so long, will he finally point an accusing finger at him? It's hard to imagine, but what are his options?

Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.

TOP