|
Back to Index
Varieties
of justice
Patricia
Hayner
From The Day After Mugabe, Africa Research Institute
November 01, 2007
Read more from
The
Day After Mugabe: Prospects for change in Zimbabwe
http://www.crookedlimb.net/ARI/research-papers.php
Download
this document
- Adobe
PDF version (48KB)
If you do not have the free Acrobat reader
on your computer, download it from the Adobe website by clicking
here.
It is
a mistake, in any country, to allow the past to deter or prevent
change that would lead to a better future. But it would be no less
mistaken to believe that events of today and yesterday will not
fundamentally shape that future and the manner in which change takes
place. The challenge and the aim of transitional justice is to encourage
and strengthen a change - a transition - by finding reasonable and
appropriate means to address the need for justice.
It is unclear
what Zimbabwe's justice policies might become. A multitude of questions
remain open, and will require a national debate and close scrutiny
in order to find the right manner of addressing the past. The issues
of accountability and responsibility for current and past human
rights abuses, economic crimes and other trespasses are among the
critical outstanding questions which will loom large in any transition.
Recent years
have seen public institutions weakened and politically compromised.
The judiciary, police and other security institutions need to be
fundamentally reformed in order to build independent and fully functioning
systems that can protect the rule of law. Luckily, Zimbabwe has
a still recent history of independent and high quality institutions,
and many talents to draw on.
Economic crimes
will also have to be addressed, in the context of a quickly crumbling
economy. The theft and destruction of property, severe economic
hardship and deaths must hold a central place in any historical
review, and in any national plan to come to terms honestly with
the country's past.
In part because
of the economic devastation, those now in power may well have two
different worries in relation to any political change. The more
obvious is the risk of being held to account. But, equally, many
of those in positions of power are likely to depend on their current
status for access to economic, health and other benefits. Some of
these may be little more than basic, or sometimes lavish, perks.
In other instances, the benefits may be life-saving. Political change
that puts these advantages at risk will be strongly resisted.
Download
full document
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|