THE NGO NETWORK ALLIANCE PROJECT - an online community for Zimbabwean activists  
 View archive by sector
 
 
    HOME THE PROJECT DIRECTORYJOINARCHIVESEARCH E:ACTIVISMBLOGSMSFREEDOM FONELINKS CONTACT US
 

 


Back to Index

Considering the alternatives Mugabe should be begging Mbeki for a solution
Patrick Laurence, The Sunday Independent (SA)
June 24, 2007

The recent talks in Pretoria between the main political adversaries in Zimbabwe mark the first public sign of progress in President Thabo Mbeki's quest to facilitate a peaceful settlement of the potentially incandescent political dispute in Zimbabwe. Mbeki, of course, is acting with the backing of the Southern African Development Community which, at a summit of heads of state in Tanzania in March, gave him a mandate to assume the role of peacemaker. It is easy to scoff and observe that a preliminary meeting between the main adversaries - President Robert Mugabe's Zanu PF and the majority and minority factions of its main political opponent, the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) - is not a significant achievement. But the task of persuading the main political parties to meet at all almost certainly required a finely matched combination of tact and persistence.

Nevertheless, a long and hard road still lies ahead. As the Chinese proverb has it, even a 1 000-mile journey has to begin with a first step. But there are many obstacles and one is undoubtedly Robert Mugabe, Zimbabwe's wily and increasingly unpredictable octogenarian president. While he seems to have given his blessing to participation in the Mbeki-orchestrated settlement talks by sending a Zanu PF delegation powered by two cabinet ministers, his actions in Zimbabwe raise doubts about his sincerity. These actions include the seizure of the passport of Arthur Mutambara, the leader of the minority faction of the MDC, on the eve of his departure to a Save Zimbabwe campaign in Europe. Justifiably it is described as a display of heavy-handedness that , does not augur well for a successful outcome of Mbeki's initiative.

Further actions calculated to harass and alienate opposition politicians include, according to Mutambara, the abduction of two MDC activists who were later found dead, and the continued detention by police of MDC stalwarts, one of whom is a member of parliament, on trumped-up charges. Referring to "detention, abduction, torture and murder" of MDC activists, Mutambara says: "What is happening right now is an indication that Mugabe is not ready for any serious talks with the opposition." While apparently seeking to disrupt and intimidate the MDC, some of whose activists are still suffering from injuries inflicted on them by Zimbabwean police and soldiers in March, Mugabe is simultaneously involved in wooing the MDC. As a recent report on Zimbabwe on the News24 website notes, Mugabe departed from the text of his speech at a function marking the handing over of tractors to farmers when he spotted MDC political opponents and welcomed them with these words: "We are happy they are here. They are part of us in the [Zimbabwean] nation and [political differences] can never make them alien . . . After all, we eat together."

Mugabe might be pursuing a two-track policy with the MDC, striving simultaneously to intimidate and woo them, adopting a hard-cop, soft-cop stratagem, to lure and drive them into his camp, a gambit which, if successful, will enable him to tell Mbeki that Zimbabwe can and will solve its problems without the South African president as an honest broker. As long as Mugabe clings to power, as he seems intent on doing by standing for re-election as president next year and thereby prolonging his presidential tenure for another seven years, he risks being toppled in one of two ways: either in a sudden and dramatic implosion or in a military or palace coup. With inflation running at 4 530 percent, according to information leaked to The Standard by an official in Zimbabwe's Central Statistical Office, it does not require the intelligence of an Einstein to realise that the implications are extremely ominous.

The departing United States ambassador to Zimbabwe, Christopher Dell, has left no one in doubt about the fragility of the situation: he said the "economic madness" had made it impossible for Mugabe to remain in power much longer. The other threat to Mugabe is a palace coup to replace him as Zanu PF's leader and as Zimbabwe's president. The threat emanates - in theory if not yet in practice - from two different camps led by rival contenders to succeed him. The first is headed is by Emmerson Mnangagwa, a former Zimbabwean security generalissimo who, after reportedly carving out a fortune for himself as a carpetbagger in the Democratic Republic of Congo in the late 1990s, is now biding his time as minister of rural housing. The public face of the second is Vice-President Joyce Mujuru, though many observers believe she is a front for her husband Solomon Mujuru, the former commander of the Zimbabwean African National Army and now an immensely wealthy businessman.

Mugabe's decision to stand for re-election next year puts the chances of Mnangagwa and the Mujurus succeeding him in jeopardy, as it could precipitate an implosion that would bury all of them and impoverish the entire nation, including Mujuru. The prospect of a palace coup by either camp or even both camps acting in concert increases as the situation deteriorates. The past fortnight has witnessed the leaking of information about a pre-emptive strike by Mugabe loyalists against an attempted coup by a former army officer and several serving officers, all of whom have appeared on charges of treason in an in-camera court hearing. The alleged conspiracy, which some observers have described as an attempt by Mnangagwa's rivals to denigrate him in the eyes of Mugabe, is rightly seen as a sign of the febrile atmosphere in Zimbabwe.

If Mugabe persists in pursuing his ambition to serve another seven years as president, he risks more than displacement in a coup. A successful coup could be the prelude to Mugabe's indictment for crimes against humanity. The British minister responsible for Africa, David Triesman, warns that it is a possibility. Perhaps he has in mind the ruthless crushing by the Mugabe government of the "Matabele rebellion" in the 1980s. Triesman refers pointedly to the indictment in the International Court of Justice in the Hague of Charles Taylor, the ousted dictator of Liberia. If Mugabe wants to avoid the possibility of an implosion, being the target of a coup or the accused in a trial on charges of gross abuse of human rights, he would be well advised to help Mbeki put together a settlement that offers him a retirement package and indemnity from prosecution.

Independent political analyst Patrick Laurence is a contributing editor to The Star

Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.

TOP