|
Back to Index
The
battle of Zimbabwe
Michael Gerson
June 14, 2007
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/07165/793910-109.stm
WASHINGTON - When I talked
earlier this week with David Coltart, a Zimbabwean member of parliament
and human rights lawyer, his office in Bulawayo had been without
power for five hours. The central business district of Zimbabwe's
second-largest city, he said, was "a ghost town," with
"hardly anyone on the streets" and "signs everywhere
of total economic collapse."
Four days previously
the price for a liter of gasoline had been 55,000 Zimbabwean dollars;
that morning gas stations were advertising 85,000 dollars. Inflation,
by conservative estimates, gallops at 3,700 percent.
Perhaps 31/2 million
people -- about one-fourth of the population -- have left the country,
in a massive drain of youth and ambition. "Land reform"
has been a land grab for ruling party elites, who are proving that
intimidation and brutality are powerless to make the corn grow.
Orphans, many with the signs of childhood malnutrition, have begun
coming to Mr. Coltart's parliamentary office for help.
Zimbabweans have discovered
with horror that their founding father, Robert Mugabe, is an abusive
parent, as if George Washington had grown mad with power, expropriated
Monticello and given Jefferson a good, instructive beating.
With elections for president
and parliament set for next year, Mr. Mugabe can hardly run on his
record. So he has kicked off the campaign season by attempting to
destroy his opposition and rig the election in his favor. In early
March, his police crushed a protest rally and began arresting and
torturing political opponents. In response to international criticism,
Mr. Mugabe coolly replied, "We hope they have learned their
lesson. If they have not, then they will get similar treatment."
Constitutional changes are moving forward that will allow Mr. Mugabe
to handpick his successor. Next week parliament will debate measures
that permit the interception of e-mails and the suppression of democratic
groups, with the excuse of fighting "foreign terrorism."
Mr. Mugabe, having spent
a lifetime consuming his country, now seems determined to drink
it to the dregs.
For years, nations in
the region did nothing in response, and called their silence "quiet
diplomacy." More recently, those efforts have progressed from
nonexistent to inadequate. After the recent round of beatings and
arrests, a summit of the Southern African Development Community
-- a 14-country regional organization -- appointed South African
President Thabo Mbeki to mediate the political conflict in Zimbabwe.
Yet the summit refused to clearly criticize the regime's human rights
violations. "We got full backing," boasted Mr. Mugabe,
"not even one criticized our actions."
South African
diplomats tell American officials that there is no serious alternative
to the regime -- that the opposition is weak and divided. But perhaps
that opposition is dispirited because in March and April of this
year, 600 of its leaders were arrested or abducted, 300 hospitalized
and three killed. Any hope of "mediation" in this atmosphere
is a sham. How do you sit down at the negotiating table when one
side is using a truncheon on the other?
The precondition for
mediation is an end to beatings and torture on Mr. Mugabe's part
-- and the South Africans should insist on it. They should also
start considering more muscular options if Mr. Mugabe continues
on his current path. South Africa has tremendous leverage if it
chooses to use it. A cutoff of energy, fuel and trade could end
Mr. Mugabe's regime in a matter of days.
The hesitance of many
democracies to confidently promote democracy is one of the great
frustrations of recent years. The South Korean government does its
best to downplay massive human rights abuses in the North. India
and Japan do business with the brutal regime in Burma. It would
be progress if South African diplomats even raised the issue of
human rights in Zimbabwe and began showing the kind of moral clarity
that once benefited their own cause.
In Zimbabwe, a collapsing
economy, malnutrition, high rates of disease and a failing health
care system have produced some of the lowest life expectancies in
the world -- 34 years for women and 37 years for men.
So Mr. Mugabe, at age
83, has achieved a rare distinction in the history of tyranny --
living twice as long as his citizens are expected to live.
According to Mr. Coltart,
the most vivid image of Zimbabwe is found in the cemeteries, which
"are filled to overflowing." "There are burials at
any time of the day," he told me, "row after row of fresh
dirt, with no headstones, because the poor can't afford them ...
It is the way," he said, "that I imagine the Battle of
the Somme."
Michael Gerson
is a syndicated columnist for the Washington Post (michaelgerson@cfr.org).
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|