| |
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
Operation Murambatsvina - Countrywide evictions of urban poor - Index of articles
"Meltdown"
- Murambatsvina one year on
Solidarity Peace Trust
August 30, 2006
Download
this document WITHOUT pictures
- Word
97 version (480KB)
- Acrobat
PDF version (535KB)
Download this
document WITH pictures
- Acrobat
PDF version (1,380KB)
If you do not have the free Acrobat reader
on your computer, download it from the Adobe website by clicking
here.
Executive
Summary
Between 1991
and 2003, urban poverty trebled in Zimbabwe. It was against this
background of escalating economic collapse and social disintegration
that "Operation
Murambatsvina" (OM), or "Discarding the Filth",
took place in mid 2005. In the space of a few weeks, 700,000 people
lost their homes and/or livelihoods in a process that the UN has
referred to as "indiscriminate and unjustified". More
than two million others suffered related losses as a result of the
demolitions.
One year on,
this report assesses the state of meltdown. The situation on the
ground remains dire. Fifteen months later, almost nothing has been
done to house those who lost homes and livelihoods, or to salvage
the informal trading sector - either by the Zimbabwean government,
or by the international community.
OM began with
an assault on the informal trading sector, with arrests of 90,000
vendors nationwide in the space of a few weeks, and destruction
of vending marts. One year on, the informal sector in which 80%
of Zimbabweans eke out a living, remains largely criminalised. In
Bulawayo, 9,000 vetted and licensed vendors operate where only 120
individual sites have been built in the past year! This means thousands
of breadwinners live their entire working lives on the run, and
lose millions to theft of their goods by the police. Vendors and
their families are visibly sliding into an ever greater abyss of
poverty. There is an urgent need for legal vending sites to be (re)
built nationwide, and for immediate allocation of temporary sites
on a massive scale. The arrests and harassment must stop.
A handful of
houses have been built under the government's so-called 'Operation
Live-Well'. These have been surrounded by scandal, including corrupt
allocation of the few hundred houses built, to ruling party members.
In western Zimbabwe, not one house under this scheme is fit for
occupation, as there are no services connected: out of more than
100,000 displaced people in this region, not one person has yet
been officially housed.
International
donor organisations have fared scarcely better - even though
the UN Consolidated Appeal aims at 23,000 shelters in 2006, only
800 temporary dwellings have been built nationwide, and all of these
are in greater Harare. Reasons for this failure to provide shelter
include international concern that any shelter provided will end
up housing government supporters including the army, and not those
who were displaced. However, in some towns such as Bulawayo, local
councils have taken a stand against corrupt allocation of housing.
The demolitions have resoundingly failed to change people's
urban identity. People have not left the towns, as ordered by government.
A survey of two suburbs in Bulawayo shows that in 90% of homes affected
by backyard demolitions, those displaced have remained in the urban
setting, in conditions of shocking overcrowding. In some houses,
people now co-exist in around 1 sqm per person of floor space! Married
couples are forced to sleep apart, unmarried adults are forced to
share space, and single people live continually on the move, from
one tiny house to another. Children are exposed to sex-for-money
activities, and face schooling difficulties from overcrowding and
poverty. Some breadwinners have been forced into the Diaspora. People
live in a state of permanent existential crisis, with no way out.
This same survey
illustrates that the backyard shelters knocked down were in fact
mostly robust dwellings, with access to safe water, sanitation and
electricity. 86% of shelters destroyed do not meet the criteria
for "slums" - the demolitions were not "slum
clearance", but destroyed valuable living space.
During the demolitions
in Bulawayo, the police rounded up 1,400 displaced persons who were
being housed in the churches and forcibly dumped them in rural areas
around Matabeleland. The authors have been tracking some of these
families over the past year: follow up reveals that around 75% of
these families are now back in the urban setting, where they live
in appalling conditions, in shacks that are very inferior to those
demolished. While conditions in the urban areas are dire, those
in rural areas are perceived by many to be even worse. Even forced
relocation to rural areas has failed to change this perception,
or people's urban identity. However, people have been severely
impoverished and highly stressed by continual movements: all have
lost possessions and many have lost their health. A distressing
number have died. OM has left the informal sector in misery and
disarray. The terrible exercise of destroying people's shelter
and vending marts has left large sectors of urban populations criminalised
by the very government that should protect their rights. It has
also undermined the power of local urban councils, by the imposition
of army headed committees who have overriding powers in the government's
rebuilding exercise.
The UN and the
government of Zimbabwe have been at an impasse over how to proceed
on the issue of housing. The government is opposed to construction
of temporary shelter because that would mean acknowledging people
were thrown into crisis by the demolitions, which is still officially
denied. The UN has been opposed to building permanent shelters because
of concerns over issues of tenure.
However, the
option is to continue to do almost nothing, or to do something.
Solidarity Peace Trust believes that there is no solution to the
humanitarian crisis faced by those left in the cold and rain, other
than to go ahead and build decent shelter, and to deal with the
issue of tenure as an ongoing struggle. If this is not done, then
in a year from now, more Zimbabweans will have been forced into
the Diaspora, or will be eking out lives of even worse poverty and
despair.
Recommendations
Informal
Trading Sector
- There is
an urgent need for vending marts to be built throughout Zimbabwe:
some local authorities already have extensive plans and costing
for what is required, but lack the funds to go ahead. It is in
everyone's interests for the informal trading sector to
achieve a system of accountability and regulation. This will protect
the rights of vendors and will prevent the continuous arbitrary
arrests currently taking place, as well as controlling litter
and crime.
- The UN and
the diplomatic corps should bring pressure to bear on the authorities
including the police, to recognise the need for temporary vending
areas to be established, in consultation with vendors and bearing
in mind what is convenient to customers. This needs to be done
immediately, in order to decriminalise vending.
- The UN CAP
for Zimbabwe recognises the urgent need to help those in the informal
sector struggling to re-establish livelihoods. Concerted efforts
in providing skills training and SME development are needed: local
NGOs already involved in this need capacity building and support
to increase their initiatives.
Urban housing
crisis
- The international
community should investigate possibilities of funding large housing
projects either directly through some of the more accountable
local authorities, or
through NGOs partnering them. The Bulawayo council already works
with several
NGOs providing housing. Control of tenure could be easier for
international donors if
housing were built through local NGOs in partnership with international
NGOs, rather
than through bilateral agreements giving support directly to the
government.
- International
donors should help build the capacity of local NGOs to be able
to build on
a large scale.
- Pressure
must be brought to bear on the Zimbabwean government to return
full control
of the building of housing to local authorities, in accordance
with the UN report
recommendations; the IMCs headed by the army should be disbanded.
- The UN report
has pointed out the need for Zimbabwean local authorities to relax
urban
housing legislation. This should be a priority, to facilitate
building of temporary or
transitional housing in urban areas, with materials that can be
upgraded over time by
owners. Colonial by-laws mean building costs are prohibitive,
as types of materials that
can be used are limited. Changes in legislation might protect
residents against a future
Murambatsvina, as the government would no longer have the rationale
that their housing
was in some way illegal.1
- councils
need educating on housing alternatives used in other developing
nations, such as packed earth, wooden and other prefabricated
dwellings: there is currently a distinct reluctance on the part
of city council officials to relax housing regulations, seeing
this as posing a health and safety risk to residents. Their position
is that everyone deserves good quality housing and this is what
the laws currently enforce.
- The international
community should consider prioritising the building of sewerage,
water and road networks in areas where stands have been allocated
in urban areas. This would reduce one of the most arduous cost
burdens currently facing local councils and plot holders. Sewerage
and water systems in and of themselves cannot be usurped, and
their provision would go some way to meeting the concerns of councils
with regard to health and safety issues in developing urban areas.
Quite simply
the choice is to do something on a large scale - or to continue
to do very little or nothing. If nothing is done, then obviously
in a year from now, the situation will have changed only for the
worse for the hundreds of thousands who have lived in hopeless squalor
since their shelters were demolished over a year ago.
Download
full document
Visit the Solidarity
Peace Trust fact
sheet
1. The issue of
legality of structures is a contentious one: it is dangerous to go
along with the assumption that those in poor quality housing have
fewer rights than those in 'legal' dwellings, but nonetheless
a relaxation of housing laws at this time would reassure residents
and make it easier for people to afford the building costs of dwellings.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|