THE NGO NETWORK ALLIANCE PROJECT - an online community for Zimbabwean activists  
 View archive by sector
 
 
    HOME THE PROJECT DIRECTORYJOINARCHIVESEARCH E:ACTIVISMBLOGSMSFREEDOM FONELINKS CONTACT US
 

 


Back to Index

Part 2: Transcript of "Hotseat"- SW Radio Africa talking to Zimbabwean women activists & opposition leaders
Violet Gonda, SW Radio Africa
September 05, 2006

Back to Part 1

Transcript of the Part Two of the Programme ‘Hotseat’ in which Violet Gonda continues her teleconference discussion with Zimbabwean women activists Jenni Williams and Thoko Matshe and opposition politicians Sekai Holland and Priscilla Misihairabwi Mushonga. Broadcast on 5 September 2006

Violet: Welcome to part two of the teleconference discussion with the women leaders of the opposition movement in Zimbabwe debating the issue of mass action unity in the pro-democracy movement. Our guests are Jenni Williams, the Co-ordinator of the pressure group Women of Zimbabwe Arise or WOZA; Zimbabwe Women’s Activist and former chairperson of the NCA Thoko Matshe; Secretary for Policy and Research in the Tsvangirai MDC Sekai Holland and Deputy Secretary General of the Mutambara MDC Priscilla Misihairabwi Mushonga.

Thoko Matshe picks up from where the debate ended last week on whether or not the people have become spectators waiting for change to happen.

Thoko: There’s a lot of things that are happening. I was at a meeting with about 180 women that were dealing with the issues of the struggles that we’ve had; the Murambatsvina’s and all that. OK? That was another group looking at how to survive, how to empower themselves, how to go over their fear. There are different initiatives that are going. For me, I’m saying two things alright. Those initiatives need somehow to link together to be able to be then something that is at a certain point that can push with the same force. But, secondly, I still think, yes, some people they might not be spectators, but they are not putting their mouth where their money is. They are more about just the survival, the fighting of the poverty and things like that and we still have a big chunk of people that think there’s politics out there and there is food that I have got to get and there’s complaining about this and this; me; politics, it’s something that I don’t want to. I still think we have a large chunk of that.

Sekai: I agree with you Thoko, but I think that really the important thing there is that the Zimbabwean people again don’t have the situation or the environment of understanding where historically we are at now. There’s been a sixteen year guerrilla war of which nobody knows about because there’s no inter-generational connectivity. All we hear is people saying they fought the war. They are the ones who are beneficiaries; people know they lost relatives in the war. What have they benefited? No one tells them why they have not benefited. You have all sorts of divide and rule refined on the ground. The processes you are talking about Thoko are extremely necessary. When you cut a tree down, when the leaves start coming out again; that’s where we are at. And, that the linkages you are talking about are actually taking place and I really believe that we are on course and we are really going in the correct direction. In the multi-faceted thrust that are taking place, there’s been huge things achieved by yourself when you were in the NCA, by the women’s movement. I keep saying this to everyone all the time that the linkages are occurring. We don’t have a tradition as Africans, as scholars in Africa of taking the correct subjects in our environment to write and then see how and what we have achieved, in what time frame and where we need to go.

Violet: Now, Jenni, let’s get your thoughts on this. You know, even though there is unity of purpose, do you think it’s essential that people with different approaches find different paths?

Jenni: I think you know we shouldn’t over-theorise this problem because I think that we might think that we are theorising and we will find a solution, but I think actually therein lies our problem; we have theorised too much. It’s time to stop talking and start doing something. And, if we start to do something, all those initiatives that are happening here and there could become more focused and when you start to do things those people who are wanting to do and stop talking will begin to take steps in one direction and focus. The bottom line that we have is we can call an election as part of mass action, but the point is that we have someone who’s an expert at rigging elections. We now can no longer exercise those democratic rights. The only way open to us is people power and that involves doing things and not theorising, and I think, for me, that is the bottom line. The other issue is on the liberation war. Yes, a liberation war was fought, but what is the result? The result is further disempowerment of the people. The result is there is no health, there are no jobs, no facilities, there’s no education; all of those things. But, it’s time to stop complaining about those. Remove the system that has put this further persecution in place, and the only way we can do that is by doing something. If we talk of social justice we can now complain on and on and on, but now the time is to demand it. And, the only way we can demand it is people power in the street with those brave enough to do it. If they’re not brave enough and they want to spend time cooking it in the kitchen, please let them stay there and let other people get out and actually start doing it.

Violet: Priscilla, can you comment on this? Jenni says people want to see tangible results

Priscilla: I think what the problem is, the basic problem in this country is that we have created individuals and institutions who believe that they are the only ones who are able to do certain things in a certain way, and we therefore create a crisis of expectations. I still go back to my point Violet. Mass action is only but one; going into the streets is only but one way of pushing and pressurising the regime. There are other ways and other methods of pressurising the regime so that it can open up spaces. In fact, sometimes I actually think that it is because we have become so one-dimensional that we create the kind of problems that we face as Zimbabweans. We go out and we say to Zimbabweans: the only way to get rid of this regime is for people to go into the streets. Some of us have participated in mass actions and final pushes before. We have had women getting raped, we have had homes being destroyed and there has not been any support system in this country; not any support systems in the international world, not the view to create strategy in different areas. In Nkayi it may be a different thing altogether, it may be about mobilising people and making sure that they go and say ‘we will not have a ZANU PF representative in this place, whether it’s in council, whether it’s in parliament, whether it’s in Senate.’ Elections are part of a legitimate struggle in this country. We will not remove the Mugabe regime until we are able to get people to get into those areas and vote, and I don’t agree with people, I know that elections have been rigged, but they’ve been rigged because we have not been able to sufficiently move the numbers that we need to be able to ensure that this regime does not. And, even when it’s done, we need to have the legitimate basis to mobilise people. People don’t get mobilised if they don’t see something has been stolen from them at this time. It doesn’t matter which country you look at where people have gone to the streets and been able to push a regime to change a position. It’s been after people have been pushed either told that something have been stolen from them, which is why we all say that 2002 was probably the time in which we could have been able to mobilise the sufficient numbers that are there.

But, my basic line Violet is that let’s start appreciating that everybody who’s doing anything in this country is doing a good job. We only need to begin to live. It’s not the person just going into the street and been arrested who is doing something that will remove the regime. It’s that woman who like I said walks 85kms to go to a rally, knowing pretty well that they will be in trouble tomorrow, they are doing something to remove the regime. Let’s encourage them and let’s say ‘you are doing a good job, and what more do you need to do? The WOZA women who gets arrested over the weekend or over one weekend and stayed singing in the cells, lets encourage them so that the regime is dealing with multi faceted processes and procedures. So, not one person has an answer to the problems of this country. You can say that, then you can begin to move together. But, unfortunately, we have a situation when somebody says that their strategy and their way of doing things is the only way that you can get the regime out. That is not true, and it will not happen.

Violet: Now Thoko what can you say about this? It seems, if I heard Jenni correctly, she says that it’s time for action and Priscilla says mass action is not the only way. Now it seems there is a huge divide in terms of social standing such that people don’t agree on the formula for the Zimbabwean crisis. You know, some say there appears to be a shared goal but there seems not to be a united view. Shouldn’t there be a meeting of minds between feminists, intellectuals and the grassroots?

Thoko: Ah it would be ideal to have a meeting of the minds and we all go on, but also I think people are saying different things in a certain way, and, I think I do agree with Priscilla where she says our definition of mass action is wanting to see people in the streets tomorrow kind of thing. I think that is problematic. That also negates, like Sekai said, all the other things that are happening and the other co-operation that is happening. And, for me, it’s saying that all those should be encouraged so that we have more people actually taking part because my point of contention is that there are too few people struggling. There is that woman who walks that much, there are those 100 and whatever women from WOZA who do something, there is the MDC trying to mobilise within their structures, but, we do not have the critical mass that is relevant and that talks to actually the hardships of this country. And, I think the hardships of this country, the response from me as an individual old Zimbabwean does not match what we want to do. Yes, there are quite a lot of people doing a lot of things, but those quite a lot of people and a lot of initiatives need much more of us to do. And, there is also the need then to recognise that there will be different strategies and that bit where people are working together, they should strengthen that and make it visible most probably. Also, the other thing is that people want to see what they want to see, and they will then not see what might be there. But, my contention is that with all of us Zimbabweans that we really need to be involved in some of all those initiatives and processes that are happening and maybe have a way of strengthening them so that the pockets of action can also build a bulk work to pushing what we want to push through.

Jenni: What I’m concerned about…

Sekai: There was something about theory and that people should stop theorising.

Violet: Sekai, just a sec, I think Jenni wanted to comment to what Thoko has just said, is that correct?

Jenni: Yes, I wanted to respond to Thoko and also maybe to ask a question of Priscilla. Here, I want us to be very clear, because activists like myself, radical activists like myself look at the definition of mass action in terms of non-violent people power demanding social justice, demanding their rights on bread and butter issues. And, we are just concerned, as the women of WOZA that there is a re-defining of that word mass action. It is re-defined by politicians, it’s being re-defined by the media and it’s something that we are very worried about and, perhaps, for purposes of this interview, it is important for us to define what we are referring to because I have no objection to what Priscilla is doing, to what Amai Holland is doing. Those are important processes, I have no wish to be in Parliament, but we need a democratic system that will come into place and be ready to bring a new democratic dispensation when the people power have achieved their demand for social justice. We must be clear, but for me a woman walking 65 kms to go and attend a rally is exercising her political right but it is NOT mass action. Mass action for me is action and it is by the masses in one fell scoop in a non-violent activity.

Violet: Priscilla, can you respond?

Priscilla: In fact, that’s where the problem is. For me, it’s about civic disobedience; it’s about pressurising the regime. Elections in this country are in fact about pressurising the regime. Elections are not a luxury in this country. Anybody who decides to stand for election in this country is basically standing up to a regime. They can die, their children can die, they can loose their jobs, they can literally lose their livelihood. So for anybody to think that because they have walked in the streets and they have been arrested that is mass action. That is not true. Civic disobedience comes in various forms and it’s important that we respect that. We respect the fact there are certain individuals right now who are in civic movements who are unable to live in their homes because just the mere fact of being said you are in the ZCTU, the mere fact of being called you are in the NCA, the mere fact that you are Pius Ncube means you have stood up to a regime. This is an activist Pius Ncube by what he’s saying and what he’s doing, he’s mobilising people power. So it’s not about the person who’s going into the street only who can call themselves a radical activist. Anybody who stands up to the regime is having some form of civic disobedience, they are beating on the system. There are risks one way or the other and the more we begin to appreciate that it doesn’t matter what they have done or what we are doing, everything is equal in terms of beating the system. In fact, it goes back to the ZANU PF mentality where ZANU PF believes that the only person who is said to have dealt with the Smith regime is the one who held the gun. They are not the only people that were in the struggle that got the Smith regime down. The people that were in outside that mobilised the international community to put sanctions on the Smith regime were standing up to the regime; they were fighters. The women that carried the sadzas on their back during the pungwe were beating on the regime. They may not have held the guns, they may not have shot the soldier, but they did a part and everybody is a radical activist in whatever manner. And that woman who is walking, as far as I’m concerned, it is not just exercising a political right, it is saying a statement; it is saying ‘to hell with you Robert’, deny me food but I will continue to be publicly associated with something that you say should not happen in this country. That’s where we need to get back to and that’s where my bone of contention is. The more we respect and thank everybody, no-one is having a luxury in this system. Everybody, in whatever way they are doing are having disobedience; they are beating on the system and trying to weaken the system. You may not think it is the right way, but they are doing something.

Violet: Amai Holland we will come to you just now but I just…

Sekai: I have no electricity, I haven’t had water, it’s now dark, I can’t even write things down so I can go on with the conversation as well, but can I just say something I am thinking about now about what Priscilla and Jenni are saying?

Violet: Alright, OK

Sekai: Really, time for clichés is gone, if we don’t have our theory right our practice also doesn’t come out right. If we understood more our history of what happened before us we might get our mass action correct because all the actions that people are taking now in their different outposts, which is how it looks now, is working towards the actual action that we all want. So, I really think that we should, when we have a debate like this, try and listen to what each of us is saying. Because, what each of us is saying is extremely important in putting in the big pot. I’m sorry I’m talking in the dark because it’s quite dark now and we have no water or electricity here in Woodville.

Violet: That’s Zimbabwe for you! Now, I just wanted to go back to Jenni Williams because I am sure she would like to respond to what Priscilla was saying. And, I wanted to add a question for Jenni that do you believe that the intellectual and/or the feminist agenda is relevant to the daily existence of people in Zimbabwe at present?

Thoko: Hey! Violet why do you divide and rule us!

Violet: No I…

Jenni: Firstly, I think, what I wanted to clarify, and this I think this is why we could have been more focused on exactly what we were debating, because I agree that civil disobedience comes in many forms and that many Zimbabweans are not spectators; they are civilly disobedient or respecting their rights more than anyone else. But, you know, I still come back to the point here of we need to be more responsible in what we are defining mass action as, and, when we talk about it, what exactly are we talking about. And why we have a special point, and I am belabouring this, is because it’s something, mass action is a terminology and words that is thrown out, in my view, very irresponsibly. It’s something that needs to be planned and done very, very carefully and non violently. So I still want us to be clear are we talking of mass action or are we talking of civil disobedience because we can argue all of those points but get nowhere.

The other issue here is it is very important that every single person is engaged in the Zimbabwean struggle and they are engaged because there aren’t special shops for intellectuals, there aren’t special shops for ZANU PF people, there aren’t special shops for feminists. There’s only one place and one type of bearers cheque, courtesy of Gideon Gono, that you buy with. They all have to be engaged. But for me the bottom line is it’s the mothers who are facing most of the burden; the women in Zimbabwe who are carrying most of that burden on their shoulders and they aren’t really interested in great intellectual discourse and they don’t even really want to know what a feminist is because what they want to know is how can I demand a socially just Zimbabwe where I will genuinely have rights and my children will have those rights and I can feel that the liberation struggle has come to something, because right now, most Zimbabweans think it came to naught. And I think that for me is the major, major thing, we don’t want to be divide and rule but right now, unless an intellectual and a feminist is prepared to come and rub shoulders with those ordinary people in the street who make up the masses, that’s why it’s mass action, we aren’t going to get very far.

Violet: That was Part Two in a series of discussions with the women leaders of the opposition movement in Zimbabwe. There clearly needs to be a uniting force to bring groups together to fight for change and Zimbabweans are looking for role models. But, there are concerns that divisions still exist within the opposition movement. In next week’s discussion we see that feelings between the camps are still raw and that a level of mistrust continues to haunt the opposition groups. The key issues are given a full airing as the debate continues, so don’t miss the final segment next Tuesday.

*Comments and feedback can be emailed to violet@swradioafrica.com

Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.

TOP