|
Back to Index
Why
South Africa does not criticise Mugabe
Joseph
Winter , BBC News
March 09, 2005
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/4327199.stm
South Africa is seen
as the key international player in efforts to find a way out of Zimbabwe's
political impasse, but in the run-up to parliamentary elections it is
coming under increased pressure from all sides.
South Africa's President
Thabo Mbeki last week shocked Zimbabwe's opposition by saying the elections
would be free and fair.
But trade union federation
Cosatu, an ally of the ANC government, is on Wednesday organising a protest
outside Zimbabwe's High Commission, arguing that the elections will be
flawed.
Zimbabwe's opposition
Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) has long accused Mr Mbeki of being
too soft on President Robert Mugabe through his policy of "quiet
diplomacy", and has urged him to get tough.
And the Zimbabwe government
has not made life easy for South Africa by accusing it of spying.
Three prominent Zimbabweans,
including two senior officials of Mr Mugabe's Zanu-PF party, were jailed
last month after being convicted of passing intelligence to a South African
secret agent.
Last year, US President
George W Bush said Mr Mbeki was the "point man" on Zimbabwe,
and so his verdict on the elections will be studied closely.
But the MDC says that
by declaring the results in advance, Mr Mbeki has lost an opportunity
to keep the pressure on Zimbabwe during the election campaign.
Political analyst
Brian Raftopoulos from the University of Zimbabwe says that Zimbabwe was
always confident that its neighbours would not criticise the conduct of
its elections whatever happened - and this was why it felt able to arrest
the spies.
Indeed, South African
observers gave a clean bill of health to the 2000 and 2002 elections,
which most other monitors said were marred by widespread violence and
fraud.
South Africa's refusal
to publicly criticise Mr Mugabe has often been explained as solidarity
stemming from a common struggle against white minority rule.
But Chris Maroleng,
from South Africa's Institute of Security Studies, says that is too simplistic,
because the ANC and Zanu-PF were never allies during the struggle against
colonialism; each backed rival parties in the other country.
Cosatu, an ally of
the ANC government, has been a vocal critic of human rights abuses in
Zimbabwe.
Two of its delegations
to Zimbabwe have been sent back home and it says it will blockade Messina,
the main crossing point from South Africa, during the elections.
"South Africa
has had to tread a very careful path around the minefield of being portrayed
as a Western puppet by Mugabe," he told the BBC News website.
South Africa has always
believed that its national interest lies in avoiding civil war in Zimbabwe,
which would lead to the steady flow of economic refugees across the River
Limpopo becoming a political flood.
Mr Maroleng says the
Zimbabwean spies belonged to a faction within Zanu-PF, favoured by South
Africa, which has recently lost ground in the battle for control of the
party.
The newly dominant
group, led by retired General Solomon Mujuru, views South Africa with
suspicion, he says.
So will the elections
be free and fair?
The MDC says that
recent changes to comply with new regional electoral guidelines are superficial.
For example, to satisfy
the "fair access to state media" clause, the MDC is now allowed
to pay enormous fees to air short campaign adverts on state television,
while news broadcasts fawn over Zanu-PF rallies and ignore the opposition.
Police continue to
turn a blind eye to election violence perpetrated by the ruling party
and refuse the opposition permission to hold rallies, the MDC says.
Mr Mugabe has always
denied rigging previous elections and says the opposition cries foul to
mask its lack of popular support.
On this point, Mr
Maroleng agrees with the MDC.
"It is quite
clear that Zimbabwe has not adhered to the SADC [Southern African Development
Community] protocols."
But he, too, does
not expect any public criticism, because of regional realpolitik and a
hope that the polls will offer a way forward.
He sees the most likely
outcome of the election as being an overwhelming Zanu-PF victory, which
"unfortunately" offers the most optimistic scenario for Zimbabwe's
future.
This is why South
Africa is reluctant to criticise Mr Mugabe's handling of the election.
The Mujuru faction
is more pragmatic and moderate than the deposed group led by Parliamentary
Speaker Emmerson Mnangagwa, he says.
With a two-thirds
majority in parliament, this group would move to change the constitution
and create an executive prime minister, with President Mugabe taking a
more ceremonial role as "father of the nation".
Taking advantage of
this relatively fresh start, this new prime minister might then be able
to form a government of national unity with the MDC and change economic
policies, attracting a return of donor funding and starting to turn round
the economy.
An MDC victory, which
appears unlikely given the way the rules favour Zanu-PF, would only lead
to more of the same, damaging stand-off the country has experienced for
the past five years, he says.
An MDC parliament
would not be able or willing to work with a Zanu-PF government and the
pro-Mugabe army might even be tempted to stage a coup.
Similar scenarios,
relying on a moderate Zanu-PF faction, have been painted in the past and
have not come to pass on the ground.
South African efforts
to set up direct talks between the parties and possibly work together
to solve Zimbabwe's economic problems came to naught.
But if Mr Maroleng's
predictions do come true, South Africa will be able to feel that its policy
of "quiet diplomacy" has been vindicated, whatever the feelings
of Zimbabwe's hard-pressed opposition activists.
If not, Zimbabweans
will probably have to get used to the idea that their current hardships
are likely to last until 2008, when presidential elections are due.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|