THE NGO NETWORK ALLIANCE PROJECT - an online community for Zimbabwean activists  
 View archive by sector
 
 
    HOME THE PROJECT DIRECTORYJOINARCHIVESEARCH E:ACTIVISMBLOGSMSFREEDOM FONELINKS CONTACT US
 

 


Back to Index

An investigation into the causes of political violence during the March 2002 Presidential election in Zimbabwe, with particular reference to Rusitu valley, Chimanimani District
Moses Semwayo, The Institute of Peace, Leadership and Governance, Africa University
July 20, 2004

Link to document on University website

Download this document
- Acrobat PDF version (
328KB)
If you do not have the free Acrobat reader on your computer, download it from the Adobe website by clicking here.

Introduction
Few would disagree that organised political violence has had disastrous consequences for human life, and civilisation in this century. War, dictatorship, terrorism, genocide, and systems of social oppression have conspired to take millions of lives, divert precious economic resources from other human enterprises, and place the continued existence of humanity in question.

Yet while a conclusion may be reached at rationally, that people may not survive our collective dependence on violence, both national states and insurgent movements cling to its use. In the absence of the international rule of law or a just world order, organised violence appears to be the ultimate recourse against intolerable conditions and grave threats to our lives, interests, and values. It persists, on the one hand, because of a widespread, but largely unexamined belief that it 'works' and on the other hand, because there are no generally recognised alternative means of resolving those critical conflicts in which one or both parties perceive the stakes as too high to permit compromise. Kruegler and Parkman (1992).

Good governance is perceived by a sizeable proportion of the community as a necessary condition to the restoration and preservation of peace, stability, security and enjoyment of the good things of life. Good governance is not only regarded as essential to the legitimacy of governments and the empowerment of civil society generally, but is now seen as probably the only way out of the quagmire of crises facing the continent at the present time particularly Zimbabwe.(Lungu 1999).

This was also echoed by other practitioners that good governance is now regarded as a pre-requisite for a people’s welfare and a condition for donor support throughout the world. Africa Forum and Network on Debt and Development (AFRODAD 2003). The key attributes of good governance according to AFRODAD are participation, transparency and accountability. It also promotes the rule of law and the equitable distribution of resources. Donor countries and international financial institutions have in recent years used a country’s governance performance as a criterion to determine the donor’s assistance.

Clause 79 of the NEPAD document, reads as follows: ‘It is generally acknowledged that development is impossible in the absence of true democracy, respect for human rights, peace and good governance.’ Tsunga (2003) On the other hand the IMF has used the practice of good governance as a condition for providing balance of payments support to several Africa countries. (AFRODAD, 2003).

According to Rapoport and Weinburg (2001), good governance includes the holding of elections regularly to choose leaders freely and fairly. A new atmosphere of non-violence is creating a democratic climate, which facilitates free and fair elections of representatives. They further argued that elections have been held to choose parliamentarians, presidents, church leaders and student leaders. Elections conducted under calm conditions have brought sustainable peace throughout the world. This view was also supported by Hyden (1999).

Elections conducted under a calm environment enables citizens to express their will in choosing their government. On the other hand, elections held under violent conditions have been characterized by conflicts, which have often escalated into civil wars in most of the African countries whenever the opposition rejects or boycotts them as reported by the United States Institute of Peace (USIP 2003). The Human Rights Forum 2000 report also asserted that representatives must be chosen peacefully, freely and fairly.

Rapoport and Weinberg (2001) reported that elections throughout the world may serve important functions in democratic states, namely:

  1. elections are important because they legitimatise democratic states by combining political obligation with consensual participation. To do this, elections must be public, free and should give citizens access to politically relevant information.
  2. insofar as they bind citizens and parties to the state, elections may perform an integrating function in democratic states.
    elections and the rules that govern them may also play an important socializing role in the teaching and transmission of democratic values to the citizenry.
  3. elections may provide conventional means for the transfer of political power. Each of the four functions may help to reduce the possibility of political violence. Without a culture of tolerance, free and fair elections are not possible in most parts of Africa (Daily News, 2 March 2002).

This research therefore, is intended to investigate the major causes of political violence during the 2002 elections in Rusitu Valley, situated in the Chimanimani area. A non-violent culture is necessary to restore peace and confidence in the elected and local leadership of the country. People of any state yearn for an opportunity to express themselves freely to avoid conflicts in the future. Intimidation, violence, corruption, limited access to the media, all militate against principles of democracy, hence the need to investigate the causes of violence. Elections are an important feature of democracy, before forming 'a government of the people, by the people and for the people'. Representatives must be chosen peacefully, freely and fairly (HRF, 2000). Ideally, the constitution or laws of the country should establish the frequency with which elections are held. (Hyden, 1997).

Conclusions and Recommendations
In a nutshell, it can be concluded that the culture of tolerance, participation, transparency, freedom and other precepts of good governance are still new and scarce in Rusitu Valley hence the need to inculcate the culture of tolerance and democracy where different views are paramount to the development of the area.

It may be argued that the political violence that engulfed Rusitu Valley may have also occurred in different parts of Zimbabwe It may therefore be wise to conduct further researches in two or three districts to compare and make generalizations for the rest of the country.

This emanates from the fact that some responses were also recorded from the literature review that indicated that violence was also experienced. The current situation of political violence emanates from the inaugural elections in 1980, which were reported as having been violent and the rest of them up to 2002. There is an urgent need to have an Independent Electoral Supervisory Commission, which will run the elections without fear or favour.

This project strongly recommends that:

  • A new constitution should be put in place so that the terms of office and powers of the executive are checked from time to time.
  • The running of elections should be left to an independent electoral supervisory commission. Violence is likely to be fuelled when people have no confidence in the monitoring situation.
  • I recommend that there is need for peace committees in the area to allow for tolerant of divergent views and opinions.
  • To petition the United Nations that holding the 2005 general parliamentary elections under these same conditions, the results of the plebiscite are predictable, hence the need to put in place mechanisms that promote for a free and fair election.
  • Political parties should avoid bussing campaigners from other constituencies to come and cause violence in areas they are not known.
  • Members of the uniformed forces and CIOs should be not be partisan a to reject or accept an elected candidate and they should be scrutinised and made accountable for their actions whilst at work.
  • More civic education to allow the people of Rusitu Valley to make informed decisions in life Research to be carried in more than three District to find out the causes of violence and recommend to the United Nations

Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.

TOP