THE NGO NETWORK ALLIANCE PROJECT - an online community for Zimbabwean activists  
 View archive by sector
 
 
    HOME THE PROJECT DIRECTORYJOINARCHIVESEARCH E:ACTIVISMBLOGSMSFREEDOM FONELINKS CONTACT US
 

 


Back to Index

Position Paper on the Independent Anti Corruption Commission
Transparency International Zimbabwe (TI-Z)
July 02, 2002

Back to Contents, Next Page

Analysis of Amendment 16

Section 108A of the Constitution was created by Amendment 16, it states that the President will appoint members to this commission. This section does not mention the independence of this commission, which according to international standards is vital for its existence and its effectiveness. The SADC Protocol on Corruption signed by Zimbabwe in August 2001 refers to setting up of institutions that will fight corruption, although it does not out rightly state that an anti-corruption commission should be independent, this has been proved through experience that it should be.

Commissioners
In order to have an independent commission it is necessary for the public to be involved in the selection of the members of the commission. Inviting nominations from the public after stating clear criteria of the qualities required for such a commission can do this. These nominations will then be presented to Parliament, which will peruse and shortlist the nominees they have found suitable and take these up to the President for endorsement. The nominees should be persons from all sectors of society including the private sector and civil society. It is essential when nominating an individual to assess whether he/she has personal integrity and is from an organisation that upholds accountability and transparency.

Nominees can also be sought from interest groups such as civic society rgainsations, professional bodies such as the Chartered Accountants and even from the private sector. Approximately ten commissioners should be nominated.

There should be gender balance in the composition of the commission, this is to say that the commission should not only consist of men and women but they should be persons who are gender sensitive. There is a gender related aspect of corruption that has to be taken into consideration as the effects of corruption affect men and women differently.

The purpose of this is to have a commission that is there to serve the interests of the nation as a whole not the privileged few. Section 108A states that persons of integrity with knowledge and experience in administration or the prosecution or investigation of crime or for the suitability for appointment, if these members are appointed by the President challenging their appointment, becomes very difficult if they do not fit this criteria. The selection criteria provided by Section 108A is very narrow and giving the public a chance in the selection process may improve the quality of the commissioners.

The commission should be in a position to hire its own lawyers, computer and systems analysts, accountants and any other professionals it requires.

Functions of the Commission
The functions of the commission are tabled in section 108A (3) as briefly to combat corruption, theft, misappropriation, abuse of power and other improprieties in the public and private sectors; to make recommendations to the Government and the private sector to increase accountability and integrity and to prevent improprieties and to exercise any other functions imposed by an Act of Parliament. After having studied other African Commissions, the commission must include in its functions the following:

  1. Investigating the conduct of any person which in the opinion of the commission may be connected or conducive to corruption,
  2. Receiving and investigating any complaints alleging corruption in any public body,
  3. Educating the public on the evils of corruption,
  4. Assisting any law enforcement agents of the government in the investigation of offences involving dishonesty or cheating of the public revenue,
  5. Advising heads of public bodies to change in practices or procedures compatible with the effective discharge of the duties of such public bodies which the commission regards as necessary to reduce the likelihood of the occurrence of corrupt practices,
  6. Assisting any law enforcement agencies of the government in the investigation of offences involving dishonesty or cheating of the public revenue,
  7. Examining the practices and procedures of the public bodies in order to facilitate the discovery of corrupt practices and to secure the revision of methods of work or procedures are in the opinion of the commission, may be conducive to corrupt practices,
  8. Enlisting and fostering public support in combating corruption.

Having these broad functions increases the likelihood of the commission being successful, as it will not be restricted to certain aspects of corruption.

Independence of the Commission
The issue of independence is important since if the commission is under a ministry there is the danger of political interference and issues of political accountability and allocation of resources for the commission are raised to establish such independence. If politics is the key aspect the commission will not be successful. In most existing anti-corruption commissions the officials are appointed by the Head of State and report either directly to the Head of State or through a ministry. This is giving too much power to the Head of State and this may be detrimental if he/she is not seen to be committed to the anti- corruption cause. Section 108 A (1) states that this will be the case in Zimbabwe.

Finances of the Commission
For this commission to succeed it must have adequate financial resources provided by the responsible government. The reason for this is that in order to tackle corruption at high levels the commission must have the resources to be able to investigate and detect the practices. There are high-tech methods of misappropriation especially in the private sector and the commission and those working under it have to be abreast with these methods. Only in Malawi and Botswana have the commissions stated that they have sufficient funding. In African countries where such commissions exist, surveys were conducted and these indicated that in order to curb corruption independent commission require sufficient funding. Zimbabwe should learn a lesson from these countries while it is in the process of establishing its own commission. Section 108A of the constitution is limited.

Considering the nature of the commission it should have its own budget allocation and not be part of a ministry as the issues of independence and control will arise. Other commissions in Zimbabwe have been funded, through a ministry, and have thus lost their autonomy, e.g. the Electoral Supervisory Commission and the ineffective Ombudsman’s office. Constitutional changes have to be made to allow the commission to be autonomous.

Powers of the Commission
It is important for the commission to have the power to investigate cases of corruption, section 108A (4)(a) states that Parliament can confer powers of investigation on the commission. This in our opinion is inadequate as this should be one of the commission’s major duties. It is a well-known fact that the law enforcement agency is ill equipped to deal with sophisticated methods of corruption.

The commission must have powers of prosecution and not rely on the AG. This is because the AG can decline to prosecute, as he is part of the cabinet. It is imperative for the commission to have it's own powers to investigate and prosecute thereby taking away the responsibility of corruption from the police and AG. The fact that the commission be created and remains autonomous is an integral aspect of its success.

Public education is another aspect that the commission has to be involved in as one of its principle powers. The proposed commission as provided for by the Constitutional Amendment does not confer such powers on the commission. The most important aspect of public education is that the general public will be made aware of the evils of corruption and how each case impacts on their lives. Once this happens the prevention arm of the commission should be its strongest as when the public says no to corruption in all sectors, i.e. government departments and private sector, it demands accountability and good governance, the levels of corruption will decrease.

The protection of whistleblowers must be incorporated in the commission. Whistleblowing is the act of reporting a corrupt act to the relevant authority, regardless of the motivation. Providing legal protection to whistleblowers is a key component to any systematic effect to fight corruption, it is important to provide whistleblowers with strong assurance against retaliation and encourage them to come forward and speak out in the public interest. It is necessary to seek significant solutions to the problems that cause people to refuse to come out in the open with cases of corruption. The purpose of the protection of whistleblowers is supposed to be the first step in mitigating the fear of reporting and reluctance on the part of the potential whistleblower. Section 108 A does not mention whistleblowers protection and we as TIZ see this as a major oversight on the part of the constitutional amendment.

International Conventions
Internationally, there has been an increased effort to curb corruption this is a result of the realization of the astronomical sums of money lost through this deed. There are bodies that have adopted conventions on anti- corruption e.g. Organisation for Economic Co-operation Development (OECD) Convention Against Bribery of Foreign officials, OAS (Organisation for American states) has an Inter- American Convention against corruption. UN Declaration Against Corruption and Bribery and the International code of conduct for public officials and the TI Lima Convention give clear guidelines of how these conventions can be implemented at all levels, i.e. internationally, regionally and nationally.

These conventions have to be taken into consideration especially where they have been signed and can also be used as a guideline to enact or amend our own legislation and in the establishment of the commission. The conventions are not limiting the fight of corruption to be squarely on the government’s head but the private sector and civil society must be engaged to combat corruption nationally and internationally.

Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.

TOP