|
Back to Index
Old
Mutual Youth Development Fund: Did we celebrate too early
Youth Forum
April 02, 2012
The Kurera-Ukondla
Youth Fund was launched on November 24 2011 by Vice President Joyce
Mujuru, at a memorable occasion with the indigenisation minister
holding a cardboard cheque of $11 million amid pomp and funfair.
The launch was celebrated and lauded from all angles of society
as a noble initiative that was going to provide relief to the ever-marginalised
young men and women of Zimbabwe.
It is no secret
that today it is almost a curse to be young. Anyone who wants to
offer any form of assistance to people who wish to start and run
their own enterprises always places one requirement that is not
friendly to the youths of Zimbabwe: Collateral. While it is understandable
that private players would want collateral for the capital they
inject into businesses, it is mind-boggling how the government expects
young people to have the collateral for loans as little as US$1,000.
By virtue of being young, we have not had the opportunity to own
the properties they require as collateral and the Old Mutual Youth
Development Fund came with a difference that led to all stakeholders
celebrating as no collateral was required.
The elimination
of the collateral requirement gave many of us reasons to celebrate,
and we did not realise that there was still a lot of work to be
done if real youth empowerment is to be achieved, even with the
US$11m Old Mutual was offering. It will not be greatly misplaced
or misguided if we are to conclude now, four months after the fund
was launched, that we celebrated too early as the fund has not benefited
the young men and women of Zimbabwe.
Amidst the celebrations,
no one realised that no proper and efficient structures were put
in place to ensure that deserving applicants access the loans. Whilst
the Indigenization and Empowerment drive has a body that works to
regulate and spearhead the initiative, no such institution existed
for the Youth Development Fund. The Youth Forum calls for the establishment
of such a board comprising of young people from all walks of life
who are qualified for the different duties they will be assigned
to and will be responsible for analysing business proposals and
approving of loans.
The board should
be responsible for spearheading the distribution and monitoring
of all Youth Development Funds in the same manner the David Chapfika-headed
Indigenization and Economic empowerment Board is running the current
indigenization drive.
The inception
of such a board will allow for quick disbursements of all youth
funds, a development that will auger well with the needs of the
youths. With the current setup, four months after the launch, only
US$229,325-61 has been disbursed, a mere 2% of the total fund available.
What this means is that over US$10.5m meant to benefit youths is
still lying in some office there while the youths are suffering
in the streets.
The board will
also be responsible for ensuring that the fund's administration
is transparent, fair, non-partisan, not corruptible and above all,
youth-friendly and youth sensitive. It will also be the duty of
the body to ensure that all recipients of the fund have been well-trained
in fields like business management and entrepreneurship to ensure
that all enterprises established under or supported by the Fund
remain sustainable and viable. This comes against the reality that
some youths are literally 'buying' proposals that make
the grade when they do not have the basic skills to run businesses
resulting in their initiatives crumbling before they even take off,
a scenario that will result in non-repayment of the loans granted.
Still in a bid
to ensure the sustainability of the enterprises established under
the Fund, it is imperative for the government to come up with protectionism
policies aimed at ensuring that the newly formed enterprises get
business. This can be achieved through a number of ways including
giving preference to the formed organizations in all government
tenders and ensuring that other established and big corporates get
a certain quota of their requirements from the newly formed enterprises.
Such policies will stimulate the exponential growth of the created
entities and will help them to remain sustainable and eventually
result in the Fund benefiting more youths.
The government
is also encouraged to investigate cases of corruption involving
some CABS officials approaching youths saying they can facilitate
their access to the loans provided they get US$2,000 of the US$5,000.
Such abuse of office should never go unchallenged and all implicated
in the scandal should be brought to book as their actions are only
helping to continually marginalise the young men and women of Zimbabwe.
It becomes very difficult for the recipient of the loan to pay back
if he loses 40% of the principal to unscrupulous CABS employees.
The Youth Forum
urges the government, the Youth Ministry, the Zimbabwe Youth Council,
CABS Bank, Old Mutual to come up with a strategy that will see the
current Youth Fund being disbursed timeously and to the right and
intended beneficiaries without favour or prejudice. They should
also investigate all allegations of corruption, partisan distribution,
and lack of transparency and openness that has been witnessed in
the distribution of the fund.
Visit the Youth
Forum fact
sheet
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|