|
Back to Index
Chiefs and ZUPA should lead community trusts
Zimbabwe
Unemployed People's Association (ZUPA)
February 27, 2012
In 2007, a balanced
MDC and ZANU PF House of Parliament
in Zimbabwe passed the Indigenisation
and Empowerment Bill that later became law. AT the time, the
empowerment programme appeared to have support of all parties in
the Government
of National Unity (GNU). Indeed, all the parties have continued
to support it although differing on how it should be implemented.
ZUPA has in
the past raised concerns that the politicisation of Zimbabwe's
indigenisation programme made it appear as if one party was growing
cold feet on the programme and another appeared to proceed in a
manner that has been perceived by some investors as punishment.
ZUPA represents
the interests of the millions of Zimbabweans who need jobs and a
better livelihood. For this to happen, we need to promote an environment
that will attract investment, grow the economy and create jobs.
We therefore believe that ways of ensuring a genuine, transparent
and non-partisan process is crucial.
A few weeks
ago, ZUPA called for the depoliticisation of the indigenisation
programme. We asked politicians to sing from the same hymn sheet
on the issues in a way that will give confidence to investors.
ZUPA followed
with interest, comments by Prime Minister Tsvangirai when he observed
the need for the communities of Manicaland to be given access to
shares in the diamond mines.
We remain convinced
that the programme can only be seen to have delivered in the interest
of Zimbabwe if the ordinary citizens at grassroots have access to
the shares in corporations in their areas through community trusts
as is the case with First Nations in Canada and BEE in South Africa.
For this to happen, the leadership of the community trust must be
non-political but retain credibility, transparency and easy identity.
That is why
as ZUPA, we have recommended to the Government of Zimbabwe that
all ZUPA ward councils representing the entire community in a chiefdom
form community trusts that will be lead by the chiefs representing
the wards covered. Our hope is that all parties in Government and
those outside can establish resonance on the empowerment issue.
The millions of unemployed and poor Zimbabweans whose interests
ZUPA represents need support in accessing shares in a way that is
inclusive but still maintaining and safeguarding the interests of
investors.
As representatives
of the majority of Zimbabweans that have suffered for a long time,
we have learnt that the best way to achieve social or economic justice
for poor members, is to find ways of achieving the best out of what
we are given. We accept the Indigenisation
and Empowerment Act is now law in Zimbabwe. We therefore put
our energies to understanding how it can fairly benefit the millions
of Zimbabweans we represent.
ZUPA has consistently
taken the position that a 10 percent share ownership in corporations
is reasonable for local communities. We are aware that this is less
than most local communities get in other countries like South Africa,
but we also believe in being realistic. We understand the many competing
interests in the Empowerment programme in Zimbabwe and the views
of stakeholders.
The Government
has agreed that 10 percent of the shares should be given to community
trusts. We have consulted grassroots structures on the following:
What should constitute the beneficiary community? Who should lead
the resultant trust?
The feedback
ZUPA got from the grassroots was that it was best for perpetuity
for community trusts to be formed around chiefdoms lead by the chief
as the chair of the board of trustees. This means every chief in
Zimbabwe is being asked to chair a community trust whose members
are citizens within their chiefdom.
An up to date
database of the citizens within the chiefdom will be needed and
will be managed by the trust secretariat.
The members
of the community will participate in the decisions on how the dividend
will be used in the community through the ZUPA ward council structures.
The chiefs were
identified on account of their expected traditional leadership and
assumed political neutrality. Historically, the chiefs have headed
tribal trust lands that were held in trust for the ordinary citizens.
The trust leadership
would also provide a consistent approach that is not influenced
by the volatile changes in political leadership. ZUPA believes that
it is paramount that politics in not put at the centre of the programme.
ZUPA is now
in the process of engaging chiefs and communities and invites other
Zimbabweans outside our circles to come and participate in this
inclusive empowerment programme. We encourage corporations to consider
a 10 percent community trust share ownership as lead by a local
chief within their proposals.
Back in 2007
when the MDC and ZANU-PF parliament put the bill through, we would
have wanted to public and stakeholder consultation. But now that
the law is in place, we further encourage the international community
and investors to be sympathetic to our efforts of ensuring that
it is the community that benefits from the programme to alleviate
poverty and create wealth for future generations.
We believe that
chief based community trusts will be transparent, easier to monitor
and minimise corruption and exclusion. Every Zimbabwe can identify
their chiefdom of origin.
ZUPA sees the
scheme as a viable one if dependency on aid will be stopped. We
see this being a way of resourcing services such as education and
healthcare for local communities. Above all, we see this as a way
through which the ordinary citizens can have access to economic
means.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|