|
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
New Constitution-making process - Index of articles
Civil
society opposes new constitution process
IRIN
News
April 20, 2009
http://www.irinnews.org/report.aspx?ReportID=84010
The creation of a new
Zimbabwean constitution is severely straining relations between
Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai's Movement for Democratic Change
(MDC) and its civil society partners, who are usually united by
their opposition to President Robert Mugabe's ZANU-PF.
A draft
constitution was agreed by ZANU-PF, the MDC, and a break-away
grouping led by Arthur Mutumbara, at a meeting in the Zimbabwean
resort town of Kariba in September 2007.
What has become
known as the Kariba Draft paved the way for the Global
Political Agreement (GPA) between ZANU-PF and the MDC, signed
on 15 September 2008, although the unity government it ushered in
only came into effect on 11 February 2009 after months of political
bickering.
The Speaker of Parliament,
Lovemore Moyo, from Tsvangirai's MDC, announced earlier this month
that a 25-member parliamentary committee comprising legislators
from the MDC, Mutumbara's break-away MDC and ZANU-PF and would lead
the process of writing a new constitution.
"The historic inter-party
political agreement places the responsibility of leading the constitution-making
process on parliament and, more importantly, provides an opportunity
for the country to create a constitution by the people and for the
people," he said. The committee is expected to finish the process
by 2010 and subject the new constitution to a referendum by July
2010.
Lovemore Madhuku,
chairman of the National
Constitutional Assembly (NCA), an organization of labour movements,
churches, business, human rights and civic groups, said the process
should be driven by civil society, not politicians, and that they
would begin campaigning for a "No" vote in the expected
referendum in protest.
"As the NCA, we
reject the parliamentary committee that has been announced to lead
the process of writing a new constitution. The process should be
people-driven and not led by parliamentarians. We will campaign
against it and ask people to reject the flawed constitution during
the referendum," Madhuku told journalists.
The NCA successfully
thwarted Mugabe's attempt to introduce a new constitution in 2000,
giving ZANU-PF its first electoral defeat since coming to power
after independence from Britain in 1980.
Constitutional and Parliamentary
Affairs Minister Eric Matinenga told a recent meeting of civil society
representatives that "the Kariba Draft is not, and will not
determine, the final constitution. The draft will only serve as
a point of reference."
A people
driven constitution
The Zimbabwe
Congress of Trade Unions (ZCTU), the largest trade union federation
and birthplace of the MDC, also condemned the fact that the new
constitution would be written under the leadership of parliament.
ZCTU secretary-general
Wellington Chibhebhe told IRIN: "We have always stood by the
belief that a constitution-making process should be people-driven
and led by an independent body of people, and that position has
not changed.
"So far we have
not lobbied for the rejection of the constitution when the referendum
is done, the ... [issue] is about the process of coming up with
a new constitution. If the process is not adjusted so that it is
people-driven, then we will be forced to come up with a position
to say 'No' to the whole process and outcome," he said.
Clever Bere,
president of the Zimbabwe
National Students Union and another MDC ally, told IRIN they
were opposed to the "process of coming up with a new constitution
[and it] should not be allowed to proceed.
"As civic society,
we were expecting an all-stakeholders conference that would come
up with an independent commission, which would take charge of coming
up with a new constitution, and not politicians, as has happened."
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|