THE NGO NETWORK ALLIANCE PROJECT - an online community for Zimbabwean activists  
 View archive by sector
 
 
    HOME THE PROJECT DIRECTORYJOINARCHIVESEARCH E:ACTIVISMBLOGSMSFREEDOM FONELINKS CONTACT US
 

 


Back to Index

Message from Zim Civil Society Organisations & Social Movements in the context of the G8 Summit
Global Call to Action Against Poverty (GCAP)
July 05, 2005

Zimbabwean Civil society organisations and Social movements meeting in Harare, under the *Global Call to Action Against Poverty (GCAP)* banner to deliberate on the forthcoming G8 Summit are calling on the Government of Zimbabwe to stop all foreign debt repayments immediately, and instead utilise the resources it has to address the social and economic crises bedevilling the country.

The Zimbabwe government has pledged to repay US$15 million every quarter.

As leaders of eight rich countries (G8), representing 15% of the world population are getting together in Scotland to take decisions that will affect 3 billion people, half of humanity, living on less than one dollar a day, we note that it is immoral for the government to heed calls for honouring its debt repayments when research has shown that the country’s human development indicators have dropped significantly and basic needs cannot be met to the extent that the bulk of the country’s citizens are now living well below the PDL.

In this respect, we want leaders of the G8 Summit and other international institutions like the IMF and World Bank, to consider that debt repayment should not be a priority for Zimbabwe and other countries faced with humanitarian crises and severely shrinking economic bases that cannot sustain the basic livelihoods of their populations.

In solidarity with other GCAP participating organisations and movements we note with concern, that the G8 is not a formal international governance body, yet they control the key institutions of global finances.

Further, their countries dominate trade and investment markets and they have unparalleled and unmatched military power.

While we challenge the G8 over its legitimacy, we have to point out that these countries are uniquely able to act on financing development and influencing the international institutions to stop the imposition of damaging policies on developing countries.

Zimbabwe is currently under EU and US sanctions.

The G8 have a unique possibility and obligation to make major steps towards global economic justice.

We call on the G8 to increase development finance and improving the quality of aid as a key element in enabling developing countries to eradicate poverty and achieve the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). It is not politically tenable for the donor community to give rhetoric support for the MDGs and an international development agenda while refusing to provide the financial resources needed to meet their commitments.

On Aid, we raise the following concerns:

  • Though different figures are circulating it is broad consensus that to meet the MDGs at least $50 billion more per year have to be made available immediately. Furthermore every G8 country has to agree on a binding timetable to reach the 0.7 commitment as soon as possible.
  • ODA should be used for the poor. Counting other costs like domestic refugee costs and student funding as aid is unacceptable even if the DAC criteria allow that. Accounting debt relief as aid is equally unacceptable. Debt forgiveness that often goes to bail out donor country co-operations should be additional to aid.
  • All aid has to be untied.
  • New forms of finance such as international taxation need to be agreed upon to make resource flows for development needs predictable and sustainable in the long run. These new sources have to be based on binding agreements and should not be voluntary. They should be additional to the commitment to achieve 0.7.
  • A fundamental change in the donor/recipient relationships is needed to make aid work for the poor. Aid must not come with economic policy conditions attached such as privatization, de-regulation, trade liberalization and fiscal discipline that is limiting the country’s capacities to build much-needed public services. It should be used to fund community and country defined development priorities.

On Debt we note the following:

  • Canceling debt is a matter of social justice; G8 and other creditors have a co-responsibility for the debt crisis by irresponsible lending practices.
  • The unpayable debt of all poor countries needs to be fully cancelled. The recent new commitments from the G8 on debt are welcome, but need to go much further. Specifically to bridge the financing gap for meeting the MDGs at least 62 poor countries need 100% debt cancellation now.
  • Debt cancellation must include all debt may it be multilateral, bilateral and commercial.
  • Debts must be fully cancelled, we are not satisfied with debt service cancellation for limited periods but want debt stock write-off.
  • Debt relief must provide additional resources for poverty reduction and should not be taken out of aid budgets.
  • Debt cancellation should not require further conditions, the resources gained through debt relief should be used for community and country defined development priorities which further the objectives of eradicating poverty and guaranteeing human rights for all.

On Trade It is repeatedly emphasized that trade has substantially more potential to finance development than aid ever can. This can only be the case when international rules of trade make effective provision for the rights and needs of developing countries, their producers and their citizens. However trade has become the vehicle for the indiscriminate liberalization of developing country economies and the imposition of harmful conditions instead of supporting sustainable development, poverty eradication and gender equity.

We call on the G8 to send a clear message that they will work towards a fair and just international trade system and to announce trade measures that:

  • increase accountability and transparency of governments and international organizations to their grassroots in the formulation of international trade rules and national trade policies
  • end the use of conditionality to force poor countries to liberalise their markets.
  • Ensure consistency of trade policies with respect for worker’s rights and human rights more broadly.
  • protect public services from enforced liberalization and privatization, secure the right to food and affordable access to essential drugs and strengthening corporate accountability
  • end dumping and rich countries subsidies that keep people in poverty.
Statement sponsored by:

Some GCAP contacts in Zimbabwe

Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.

TOP