| |
Back to Index
Visibility
- Everard Read / Johannesburg
Melissa
Mboweni
Extracted from Art South Africa, Volume 5 Issue 4 Winter 2007
According to Mary Jane
Darroll, a director at the Everard Read Gallery, Johannesburg, and
curator of Visibility: The state of being able to see or be seen,
a group exhibition of works by seven black male artists, the show
was put together to show "a contemporary vision of Africa by
Africans post 1994". The artists selected to achieve this vision
were Mbongeni Richman Buthelezi, Amos Letsoalo, Zamani Makhanya,
Moss Mokwena, Nkoali Nawa, Lindelani Ngwenya and Ben Tuge.
The act of being visible
implies to subjectivity and becomes quite problematic in a group
show featuring black male artists in a commercial gallery space
in Johannesburg. Michel Foucault, in his article 'The Order of Things',
suggests, "all periods of history possessed certain underlying
conditions of truth that constituted what was acceptable as discourse".
These conditions, he says, changed over time. Discourse and subjectivity
inform what one sees as the artist, curator, and viewer. This is
particularly evident in post-1994 South Africa.
Buthelezi uses melted
plastic in collage. His scenes, which feature titles like Healing
the (Black) past, include jovial places of drinking. Before 1994,
the local shebeen was a place of catharsis and celebration; today
it is increasingly a trendy hotspot for young upwardly mobile BEE
candidates. By contrast, Letsoalo depicts rural scenes of ritual
practice, places are becoming increasingly unfamiliar for those
living in metropolitan areas. Letsoalo's people have become part
of a sentimental rhetoric whose history will only be visible in
anthropological documents.
Makhanya explores shapes,
figures and symbolic African artefacts, perhaps to question the
significance and relevance of these in the context of present day
Africa. The cowry shell historically had monetary significance in
some African cultures; today it can easily be an icon in a sangoma's
reading. Mokwena provides a way to navigate the busy streets of
Jo'burg. Influenced by artists like Mondrian, Picasso and Pisarro,
Mokwena flattens this robust city into computer chips on a dark
landscape. His images have an eerie, alienating quietness that is
very different to the mechanical bustle and noise of Jo'burg.
Nawa's dark charcoal
portraits recall Athol Fugard's Tsotsi, a slick, street-smart character
mouthing tsotsitaal ready to slit your throat with his Okapi knife
at any suspicion that you're out to get him. Nawa's figures are
not very convincing and struck me as dated. Today's tsotsi cuts
a more 'refined' figure; he wears tailored suites, not balaclavas.
The maternal figure has
always played a significant role culturally. Ngwenya's use of copper
in a basket weaving method to depict such figures reminds one of
maternal comfort and accommodation. This figure has been deified
in many African societies as the peacekeeper, the educator, the
pillar of strength in the nation. Again, one wonders about the relevance
and role of this maternal figure in present day South Africa, an
insight that becomes apparent when one examines Ngwenya's hollow
structures.
Zimbabwean-born Tuge
brings topical politics to bear in a work that warns Mugabe to repent
for his sins. Titled Boarder Hopping, Tuge's sculpture shows a well-dressed
woman with long legs, tucked into high heals, holding a baby in
her arm. The work is cynically humorous: the wide-eyed figure is
presumably a Zimbabwean exile leaving home for the promise of a
better life south, in the city of lights, Gauteng Maboneng.
Needless to say the curator
of the exhibition set herself a mammoth task of fulfilling the stated
intention of the exhibition, particularly given the underlying conditions
of truth at play. Inevitably, the show raises more questions than
it answers. Why show only black artists? Or, more pointedly, why
the exclusion of female voices if the exhibition promises a contemporary
vision of Africa by Africans post 1994? And who are these Africans?
Who defines them? Are they born on the continent of Africa? Is it
possible to house an exhibition reflecting a contemporary view of
Africa without taking into account her vast geography and its many
nuances? When we use the word African, in South Africa, post 1994,
do we assume commonalties where there are none?
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|