|
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
2008 harmonised elections - Index of articles
Zimbabwean
agriculture on its knees
Busani
Bafana, New Agriculturist
May 31, 2008
http://www.new-agri.co.uk/08/03/develop/dev1.php
For many years hailed
as southern Africa's bread basket, Zimbabwe's agriculture has been
on a steady decline, shrinking by 50 per cent in seven years, triggering
a wave of food shortages and pushing up the prices of food stuffs.
Despite differing
opinions on the wisdom of the land redistribution exercise, there
is agreement among farmers and farmer organizations that the country's
agriculture is on its knees and desperate for new investment. Successive
droughts, poor investment in production, equipment and inputs, lack
of know-how and shortage of labor have taken a toll on Zimbabwe's
agricultural sector, which is failing to feed its hungry population
or supply raw material to its agriculture-based industries.
Impact on smallholders and industry
The
crisis affects both commercial and smallholder agriculture. According
to Deon Theron, Vice-President of the Commercial Farmers Union (CFU),
"Large scale commercial farm output, with a 50-70 per cent
reduction in output for most important commodities over the last
seven years, can be described as a complete disaster." Production
of food grains, small grains, traditional export and oil seed crops
have been hit hardest, following the 'fast track' redistribution
of farms which began in 2000. In the beef sector, Zimbabwe has failed
to meet its export quota to the EU for a number of years.
The political impasse
following Zimbabwe's presidential elections has increased tensions
further. The CFU has a record of over 100 farms having been 'visited'
over recent weeks by independence-era war veterans with requests
to farmers to immediately vacate their farms. Despite police managing
to defuse most evictions, production has been severely disrupted.
Poor supply
of inputs and poor weather have also impacted on smallholder farmers.
According to Ben Gilpin of lobby group Justice
for Agriculture (JAG), "The staple maize has, in particular,
suffered from an acute shortage of fertiliser and seed. Farmers
who have been able to access these inputs have frequently received
these late in the season and this, together with early heavy rains
followed by a dry spell, has contributed to potentially the most
serious cereal shortages since land reform started."
As it has declined, the
agriculture sector has taken with it jobs which directly employed
more than 200,000 people in the early 1980s and millions of others
through agricultural-related activities. Industries that supported
a once vibrant agricultural sector have either closed shop or have
been forced to scale down operations.
Signs of hope
Noting that information
and statistics on agricultural production were scanty and subject
to polarised use by the proponents and opponents of land reform,
Sam Moyo, executive director of Harare-based think tank, the African
Institute for Agrarian Studies (AIAS) says there is no dispute over
whether there has been a decline in agricultural production. AIAS
estimates that land reform has reduced the extent (now around 40
per cent) and intensity of land use. However, new forms of financing
agriculture, including credit and sub-contracting, new joint ventures
and state credit and support schemes have emerged, although limited
in area coverage.
Deon Theron of the CFU
has also seen signs of hope. "Probably the most spectacular
successes are those where the Commercial Farmers Union has assisted
the properly resettled small scale farmers on uncontested land,"
he says. In one example the maize production of the small scale
farmers was increased from half a tonne per hectare to seven tonnes
per hectare in three years, using ex-commercial farmers as consultants.
What reforms are needed?
For the CFU, the future
of agriculture in Zimbabwe is closely bound to the country's political
fortunes: political stability, macroeconomic stability, maintenance
of law and order, long term security of tenure and incentive pricing
for commodities are all cited as necessary for reviving the sector.
For Sam Moyo
of AIAS, the
way forward for Zimbabwe's agricultural production is a strategy
of accommodation in terms of greater inclusion, tenure security
and production incentives. "A reversal of the land redistribution
is neither politically feasible nor a pre-requisite to recovery,"
he says, noting that sustainable land utilization required key land,
agricultural and economic policy measures to increase agricultural
productivity, investment and exports. "Land redistribution
should be completed by allocating land to the excluded. This includes
accommodating white farmers, on the basis of parity rather than
privilege; namely, through the 'one person one farm' policy."
However, while solutions
are urgently needed to restore food security and promote economic
growth, neither will be possible until the political impasse of
Zimbabwe's presidential election is resolved.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|