|
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
Post-election violence 2008 - Index of articles & images
Land,
retribution and elections: Post election violence on Zimbabwe's
remaining farms 2008
Justice for
Agriculture (JAG) and the Research and Advocacy Unit (Idasa)
May 2008
Download
this document
- Acrobat
PDF version (490KB)
If you do not have the free Acrobat reader
on your computer, download it from the Adobe website by clicking
here.
Introduction
On March 29, 2008 the
Zimbabwean people voted Zanu PF out of power. Today, for the first
time in its 28-year rule, Zanu PF no longer has a parliamentary
majority despite a concerted election campaign of vote-buying, electoral
roll tampering, voter intimidation and general use of brute force.
At the time of writing this report, a full month after the harmonised
elections, the results of the presidential election have only just
been released and the illegal recount of several House of Assembly
constituencies has brought Zanu PF no relief.
The last time
Zanu PF officially lost a national vote was in 2000, when the people
voted 'no' in a referendum for a constitution which amongst other
things would have extended the executive powers of the President.
Within a few days of that referendum defeat the first of the now
infamous commercial farm invasions had begun, and these soon turned
into a massive and systematic nation-wide campaign to intimidate
a sizable but vulnerable section of the population into support
for the ruling party. All this is described in some detail n the
JAG and GAPWUZ report Destruction
of Zimbabwe's backbone industry in support of political power
to which this report should be considered an addendum.
It should come then as
no surprise that the immediate aftermath of Zanu PF's 2008 election
defeat should include drastic consequences for the few remaining
commercial farmers and their workers. Having maintained a slow erosion
of the remaining commercial farms for the last few years, the Government
of Zimbabwe has once again heightened its assault on these, its
least wanted of citizens. The scale of this recent backlash has
remained hidden from view until now. It is the aim of this report
to make the current surge in invasions and human rights violations
on the farms visible for what it is: violent, widespread and systematic.
At least one-third of the remaining commercial farms have reported
major disturbances in the last three weeks.
There have already been
several reports in the local and international media highlighting
this surge in farm invasions. However, what these reports do not
make clear is the large scale of these invasions. This is not an
isolated series of populist uprisings, but a co-ordinated and centrally
planned push by the Government to remove the country's last few
white farmers, to bully their workers into support for Mugabe ahead
of the presidential election run-off, and to further extend the
system of political patronage where farms are confiscated from farmers
and given to the party faithful in exchange for continued support.
The continued holding of the land is entirely dependent on continued
support of the party.1
It must be firmly stressed
that the methods used in the current political exploitation of the
land issue, namely the violence towards white and black commercial
farmers and their work forces as well as the political "re-education,"
mass psychological torture, pungwes, human rights violations and
so on, are a continuation of what has been happening on Zimbabwe's
commercial farms over the last eight years. These tactics are well
known to Zimbabwe's farmers and their workers. In the study that
led to the joint JAG/GAPWUZ report "The Destruction of Zimbabwe's
backbone industry in pursuit of political power," almost half
the survey sample of farmers report a clinically significant level
of trauma. Anecdotal evidence also points to a high frequency of
trauma-related health problems in the farming population.
It is also important
to stress that the white commercial farmers are only one part of
this victim group. The focus by the international media on the white
farmers has created a useful smokescreen for Mugabe behind which
gross human rights violations can be perpetrated against a population
of some 1.5 million farm workers and family members. This population
represents what might be termed the "swing" vote between
the traditional MDC strongholds in urban areas and the Zanu PF strongholds
in the rural areas. There is also a small contingent of black commercial
farmers whose refusal to buy in to Zanu PF patronage systems has
resulted in their being ostracised, intimidated, and in several
cases, severely assaulted. In the Zanu PF rule book, to be a "sell
out" is as bad a crime as being a white farmer.
A few days after the
harmonised elections, reports began to trickle in of an escalation
in war veteran, youth militia and apparent military activities on
commercial farms. These violations included the usual litany of
crimes against this section of Zimbabwe's population: the barricading
of farmers into their homesteads, assaults and abductions, arson
and torture, political re-education and voter intimidation, etc.
The outcome of the elections led directly to Zanu PF unleashing
its complete arsenal on the electorate.
It must be noted
that compiling this report was complicated by the reluctance of
farmers and their workers to be identified, a reluctance due to
the very real probability of violent reprisal attacks. For this
reason, the majority of people referred to hear have been given
an anonymous code. However, the authors of the report are in possession
of informants' real names.
Note:
1. The Government
offer letter to new farmers explicitly states that the offer can
be withdrawn at any time. This state of uncertainty binds the new
farmer into an uncompromising fealty to the government, as he or
she has no legal recourse should the offer be withdrawn.
Download
full document
Visit the JAG
fact
sheet
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|