|
Back to Index
Dream
turns sour for Zimbabwe's resettled black sugarcane farmers
ZimOnline
December 20, 2005
http://www.zimonline.co.za/headdetail.asp?ID=11320
CHIREDZI - Jowaki
Chauke's dream of becoming a sugarcane farmer appeared well set to become
reality when the government land committee allocated him a plot on one
of Zimbabwe's prime sugar estates in the country's south-eastern lowveld.
But 15 months down
the line, the sweet dream is gradually disintegrating into a nightmare
not only for Chauke but for many of the 180 black villagers given land
for free on the giant Mkwasine Estates under the government's controversial
land redistribution exercise.
Mkwasine belonged
to two South African-owned firms, Hippo Valley and Triangle Limited and
was one of Zimbabwe's biggest sugar estates, producing up to 850 000 of
sugarcane before it was seized by the government - together with sugar
crop that was on it - and divided amongst Chauke and his fellow villagers.
But ask Chauke or
anyone of his fellow sugar farmers here at Mkwasine and they will tell
you that while the gift of free land and sugar was most welcome, it would
have been better had government land officers done a little planning and
above all ensured that the beneficiaries would be allocated enough space
on the sugar plots to build homes.
"It could have been
better for us had these areas been demarcated in such a manner to allow
us to build homes," bemoans Chauke, who was given 20 hectares of prime
sugar growing land at Mkwasine.
A father of three
children, Chauke added: "I do not mean to be ungrateful to our government,
but I do not know how they expected things to work out when they gave
us land to grow cane without space to build homes."
In yet another vivid
illustration of the chaos and shoddy planning that characterised President
Robert Mugabe's controversial land reform programme, government land planners
demarcated Mkwasine into fine sugar plots.
But for some strange
reason the government land planners decided to leave not even one inch
of land on which the newly resettled farmers could build homes!
Agricultural experts
meanwhile say the compulsory acquisition and subsequent subdivision of
Mkwasine Estate by the government was done in a manner bound to weigh
down heavily on production.
The composite estate
was parcelled out into uneconomic units that according to top agro-economist
and main opposition Movement for Democratic Change party politician Renson
Gasela cannot be economically cultivated.
Gasela, who is a former
chief executive of the government's Grain Marketing Board, said: "The
allocation was done in such a way that the fields for the new farmers
are dotted about making any centralised operation impossible. This is
done deliberately to make everybody fail. Otherwise why would the government
allocate land in this manner?"
The opposition politician
said Mkwasine Estate was developed as one unit comprising a network of
fields, canals and dams for one owner. "Apportioning land to multiple
owners has proved uneconomic," he added.
About 2 700 hectares
have so far been allocated to 180 new farmers but half the beneficiaries
have since deserted their plots while some have left them under the care
of relatives and friends.
But even for those
farmers like Chauke who are determined to stick it out and remain on the
land to grown sugar - the odds are increasingly looking insurmountable.
For example, Chauke's
neighbour, Tauzeni Mhlanguleni, says his cane has overgrown and will soon
be worthless because he has no money to hire additional labour to help
reap the cane.
"We cannot afford
the wages," said Mhlanguleni, adding that his most important lesson in
the past 15 months at Mkwasine has been that sugarcane growing is both
a capital and labour intensive project.
"We have exhausted
the initial government loans but have little to show for it after the
state deducted from our first earnings all what we owed them," said Mhlanguleni.
And just to compound
the despairing Mhlanguleni's problems are the fuel shortages gripping
Zimbabwe which means that even if he eventually gets to cut his cane,
it might still rot on his hands because he has no fuel to transport it
to the mill about 65km away.
A cursory glance at
the statistics provides a good insight on how the government's land reform
exercise has been in this particular instance, a giant leap backwards.
The figures show that
just about a year ago, Mkwasine under its former owners produced 110 tonnes
of sugarcane per hectare. Today, Chauke and his colleagues can only manage
40 tonnes of poor quality cane pre hectare - a yield not enough to cover
the costs of transporting the cane to the mills let alone the cost of
fertilizers and other chemicals.
"It is obvious that
the future of the farmers, without sufficient capital, without equipment,
with no experience and working individually, is bleak," Gasela said.
"The government is
set to destroy the sugar industry just as they have done with tobacco,
maize, wheat, beef, dairy, horticulture," he added.
It would be easy to
dismiss Gasela's predictions as the typical ranting of an opposition politician
were it not Mugabe himself who admitted just as much during the conference
of his ruling ZANU PF party earlier this month.
Mugabe - who has defended
his chaotic and often violent land reforms as having been necessary to
ensure blacks who were previously denied arable land by previous white
rulers also owned land - told the ZANU PF conference that poor planning
and corruption in the land reform exercise had contributed to food shortages
in the country.
Zimbabwe has largely
survived on food handouts from international donors since the government's
land reforms destabilised the agricultural sector, knocking down food
production by about 60 percent.
An estimated three million people or a quarter of the country's 12 million
Zimbabweans require more than a million tonnes of food aid between now
and the next harvest around March/April 2006 or they will starve.
But Mkwasine with
its homeless and broke sugar farmers could be the most eloquent testimony
yet to as what has gone wrong with Harare's controversial land redistribution
plan.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|