THE NGO NETWORK ALLIANCE PROJECT - an online community for Zimbabwean activists  
 View archive by sector
 
 
    HOME THE PROJECT DIRECTORYJOINARCHIVESEARCH E:ACTIVISMBLOGSMSFREEDOM FONELINKS CONTACT US
 

 


Back to Index

Report on advocacy workshop held at Pandhari Lodge, Harare Zimbabwe (4 March - 7 March 2003)
Mwengo
March 07, 2003

http://www.justassociates.org/mwengoday2.doc

Download this document
- Word 97 version (143KB)
- Acrobat PDF version (127
KB)
If you do not have the free Acrobat reader on your computer, download it from the Adobe website by clicking here.

Day 2 - 5 March 2003

Rappoteurs - Makoude/Wahu
Introductions centred around participant expectations; people's expected contributions; learning from others' experiences; how to do advocacy for first times; one person wanted to be the fly on the wall.

What was useful
Generally positive

Comments of what was not useful
English - slow down as it is difficult for non-English speakers to follow
Not challenging each other sufficiently
Important participants focus on the issues and make brief contributions
Poor time keeping

What more information do we need/share experiences of:

  • Go deeper into interface between community needs and advocacy
  • 3 faces of power
  • Basic practices on advocacy
  • How do we start community participation and how do we sustain advocacy

Established ground rules:
Collective responsibility.

Focus of the workshop:
Focusing on:

  1. how to understand the dynamics of the different political movements and design advocacy strategies appropriate to the context.
  2. Constituency building - need to engage people to understand the policy environment to force change and its enforcement
  3. A clear understanding of power and how it is played out in different political contexts
  4. people's values, attitudes and behaviour

Visioning - activists need political visions to guide their actions.
Every advocacy coalition needs to negotiate a vision. Failure to negotiate a vision or the absence of a negotiated vision causes coalitions to break apart, or to be susceptible to co-option.

Exercise - Defining Political visions - justice and democracy

Role plays: Family, NGO, Community and Executive/President
Important issues emerging:

Family -
Cultural set up economic power does not directly translate into social power (traditional norms)
Untapped power sources which the wife and children failed to recognize and seize because of the socialization process
Power - shared ownership, shared responsibility, shared decision making

NGO -
Dependency on the money source/donor and decisions assumed to emanate from that source therefore perceived sense of powerlessness (Sense that power lies "up there")
Passing the buck
Undue preoccupation with procedures over people and real needs are neglected - Clouding of the issues with abstracts like the next strategic plan to delay action.

Community Level -
Externally driven agenda
Pretense at participation and consultation
Preponderance of traditional norms which segregate youth and women
Community took charge and refused to be pushed - negotiated time factor

Executive/Parliament
Burden of proof on opposition not the government
Role reversal when the opposition becomes the one with concerns for country's health program and not the elected government
Data can be

  • a source of power
  • abused,
  • delaying tactic/abstraction and people reduced to faceless numbers,
  • vital information is not always in public domain,

Having information alone may not suffice - those with power may control the agenda and consequently utilize their position to de-legitimise the issue.
Those in power determine values and structures
Gender does not necessarily determine the decisions arrived at if it is practiced in a particular context - e.g. woman speaker supporting the government in spite of unpopular decision taken.

Questions:
What should we aim to change as activists - the systems that give rise to and support policies or people's values, attitudes and behaviour?
What should our first target be as activists?
Issue not exhaustively resolved.

Faces of Power
Power is the landscape where advocacy is done it is characterized by power plays.
Power is dynamic it may be applied in a monolithic way
Power may be looked at from both negative and positive perspectives
e.g. - Power of Moral authority, power of knowledge, power to organize

3 faces of power
Visible - parliament, congress, rules, the law
Hidden - who gets to set the agenda, public opinion
Invisible - ideas, values, socialisation

Download full document

Visit the Mwengo fact sheet

Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.

TOP